Type: Deck Idea
Format (legal 👍) modModern
Approx. Value:
$68.17

0 Likes 4 Comments
Avg. CMC 3.93
Card Color Breakdown
Card Type Breakdown

Please consider subscribing to a Deckbox Premium Account, which provides many useful collecting, trading and deckbuilding features and removes ads! View More Details
Remove ads
Main Deck - 60 cards, 18 distinct
Columns
Name  Edition $ Type Cost
Rarity Color
Creature (13)
3 Ant Queen
$1.07 Creature - Insect
2 Avenger of Zendikar
$4.98 Creature - Elemental
4 Chancellor of the Forge
$1.12 Creature - Phyrexian Giant
2 Rakka Mar
$0.60 Legendary Creature - Human Shaman
2 Rampaging Baloths
$0.61 Creature - Beast
Instant (7)
3 Harrow
$0.46 Instant
4 Staggershock
$0.05 Instant
Sorcery (13)
2 Cultivate
$0.51 Sorcery
4 Devil's Play
$0.17 Sorcery
2 Explore
$0.62 Sorcery
2 Gelatinous Genesis
$0.46 Sorcery
3 Skittering Invasion
$1.93 Tribal Sorcery - Eldrazi
Enchantment (5)
3 Awakening Zone
$1.08 Enchantment
2 Presence of Gond
$0.17 Enchantment - Aura
Land (22)
4 Copperline Gorge
$2.83 Land
7 Forest
$0.07 Basic Land - Forest
7 Mountain
$0.12 Basic Land - Mountain
4 Rootbound Crag
$5.16 Land
Sideboard - 0 cards, 0 distinct
No cards here. :(

Comments
Log in to comment
  • MemoryLapse (21-Oct-2011 06:51)

    The mana curve is wayyy too high. You need more acceleration for this to have any chance vs. the fast decks in this format.

     
  • Drake (15-Oct-2011 15:35)

    I love the idea brennan, nice to see you making another deck...

    friendly words of advice: where is the removal? Not EVERY spell has to be devoted to making tokens, looks like you have A LOT of token capabilities and I would look at incorporating removal or somehting...

     
    • brennankessler (15-Oct-2011 22:28)
      yeah, i guess i went a lil too token agro....+4 devils play and 4+ staggershock both have recurrence to take out two creatures with 1 spell and devils play may possibly be the killing blow
       
      • Drake (16-Oct-2011 03:26)

        just sayin, staggershock doesnt kill big dudes and devils play would not be cost effective...