I will be at the show but I will be working it so I wont be able to play in the tournie. 
(Come by the Cool Mini Or Not booth and say hi!)
1 2011-07-07 01:29:45
Re: How many people will be at Gen Con? (1 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
2 2011-06-06 19:17:54
Re: Would by WHI Chaos cards plus some other (3 replies, posted in Trading Post)
http://deckbox.org/sets/30901?f=334
Let me know if that stuff does anything for ya 
3 2011-05-23 19:31:05
Topic: Invasion feature request (0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
With the addition of the new restricted list, could we add restricted as a data point for the cards?
4 2011-05-19 20:54:40
Re: Lets talk about Chaos. (4 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
Thats a great Skaven list 
I keep looking at a chaos corruption list, does it just not work?
5 2011-05-19 04:40:10
Topic: Lets talk about Chaos. (4 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
I am curious if anyone has had good success with a Chaos deck of any type.
Anyone?
6 2011-05-09 19:54:15
Re: zero triggering? (3 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
I don't think that destroying an attachment is a requirement for taking the damage. i am pretty sure that you take the damage and the attachment effect has not target and fizzles.
7 2011-05-04 22:30:58
Re: Doomsayer of Morr vs Slave Pen (4 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
Destroyed is when a unit is has damage on it greater than or equal to its HP.
Sacrificed is when a model leaves play because something says it is sacrificed.
Just because a card leaves play does not mean that it is destroyed. It just means it has left play. Those two terms are 2 specific keywords that define 2 different ways to leave play.
8 2011-02-16 07:59:59
Re: Database and card scans STATUS (230 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
Found another error on the card listed as Oathbreaker. They are actually called Oathbearer.
9 2011-02-16 07:12:25
Re: Database and card scans STATUS (230 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
Error on Smash Der Beards. its listed as a support card, it is a tactic
10 2011-01-30 21:21:29
Re: [ Rules ] Return to Glory questions... (13 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
I agree with your reading on the second question. As written I think I was wrong with my original answer. That said I wonder if that was the intent of the rule.
11 2011-01-30 20:47:28
Re: [ Rules ] Return to Glory questions... (13 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
1. I don't see why not.
2. Yes. (again I can't think of a reason why not)