You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Search options
Deckbox Forum » Posts by piebandit
A lot of people today will put a blurb in their profile like "I prefer trades under $20 to go PWE, otherwise, use tracking".
The request is to
Provide a new free form text field where people can describe their shipping preferences, and
Show that field on the trading page so each user has an idea of what the other ideally wants in terms of shipping
Doesn't mean it needs to be a hard and fast validated rule, but it's a way to bring attention to it in the trading page so people can be aware if expectations wildly differ.
For us commander players who would generally like to keep a copy in case we find a random commander deck to put a card in, Could we possibly get a new option,parallel to "Auto mark unused for trade"? I'd like to ideally have this option so cards added to the inventory are auto marked for trade, except for the first one.
Some examples,
if I import a CSV and it has 3 copies of Terramorphic expanse on row 245 and another copy of Terramorphic expanse on row 5344, I had 0 in my collection currently, then 2 of the first 3 would be auto marked for trade and the last one would also be marked for trade
If I import a CSV with 6 copies of Terramorphic expanse, I had 0 in my collection currently, but created a deck Idea that used 4 of them, then 2 would be marked as trade
If I import a CSV with 17 copies of Terramorphic expanse, I had 1 in my collection currently, then all 17 new ones would be marked as trade
Possible options could be "1 per printing" or "1 of any printing"
When was TCG Player app import added? I remember it wasn't supported a while ago, and I had made my own utility.
There's some missing promo pack cards as well, at least war room. I got it in an mkm promo pack. https://starcitygames.com/war-room-sgl-
r_361-enn/
It seems like maybe there's been some sort of change or regression in how double faced cards are referenced on the site.
Double faced cards in some sets use Card A // Card B nomenclature: https://deckbox.org/editions/640-innist
night-hunt
Others just use the front face: https://deckbox.org/editions/97-innistrad
Can we make it consistent? I have a tool that converts TCG Player output to deckbox input and the inconsistency is causing problems
Posts found [ 5 ]
Deckbox Forum » Posts by piebandit