morph66 wrote:oh wow mbknight you are such a god damn victim here, you poor sweetheart. All you did was call me crazy to warn the others when what you actually did was insult my intelligence by calling me retarded.
WTF did i just read. what a slanted view of what actually happened.
You proposed a trade, i didn't like it. I countered, you didn't like it. Instead of putting your big boy pants and moving on, you decided to take it a step further and wail like a baby and and call me names. Now you are here trying to appeal to the masses by making up some really lame "I did it for the people speech." Grow the hell up, you immature brat. Nobody forced you to do anything. There is a cancel button. You hit it and bid a person farwell, get some thicker skin.
Here's a simple question: did you or did you not try to evaluate your cards at your own value based on past value?
His story explains the trade in question (
http://deckbox.org/trades/117823?s=33382) better than yours.
People making up their own value for cards is a personal pet peeve. Card value constantly change. You can speculate all you want on card value but if you want to trade for cards on the decline at the lower value, then wait for that card to actually reach that value (unless both parties agree beforehand of course). The same with trading cards on the rise for higher than current. You don't get to value a rising card at some higher future value until that card actually reaches that number. Of course a trade is more than just comparing numbers. It is, however, insulting when one party starts pulling out random numbers out of nowhere.