benczi wrote:now is the time to be playing standard: http://www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/the-financial-impact-of-bfz-expeditions-meta-discusson-gideon-and-ulamog

benczi wrote:now is the time to be playing standard: http://www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/the-financial-impact-of-bfz-expeditions-meta-discusson-gideon-and-ulamog
sirIO wrote:benczi wrote:now is the time to be playing standard: http://www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/the-financial-impact-of-bfz-expeditions-meta-discusson-gideon-and-ulamog
Silviu wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQDDFW8nLnwBest MtG commentary I've heard in a while. The guy has humor to spare!
Rarres wrote:Silviu wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQDDFW8nLnwBest MtG commentary I've heard in a while. The guy has humor to spare!
TehAuthor wrote:Let's ban twin, i will make the format diverse... 2 weeks later almost mono eldrazi top 8actually... mission completed:
TehAuthor wrote:Let's ban twin, i will make the format diverse... 2 weeks later almost mono eldrazi top 8
fistyke wrote:I smell Eye of Ugin && (||) Eldrazi Temple ban.Eye of Ugin - slim chance, e legendary, probabil o sa vedem Spreading Seas mainboarded?
TehAuthor wrote:Spreading seas nu ajuta cand turn 1 ai 3 Eldrazi mimic pe masadaaa...
juzer wrote:TehAuthor wrote:Spreading seas nu ajuta cand turn 1 ai 3 Eldrazi mimic pe masadaaa...
si e prea tarziu pentru "errata" de "this cannot reduce the casting cost below 1"
fistyke wrote:Speaking of the ban: eu chiar nu am nimic impotriva (desi e evident cauza banului). Am citit undeva un comentariu la un articol, tipul zicea: "I would ban anything that enables infinite of anything. If you win a game of Magic, win it by actually doing it." Nu e o idee rea :)first off, infinite nu exista in magic (sunt shortcut-uri, sau poti sa zici ca castigi 10000 de viata), second, problema nu e cu "infinite" ci cu FREE: Mental Misstep:( (a fost considerat broken pentru modern, si nici nu ar ajuta acuma...), Palinchron, 6/9 din power-nine Library of Alexandria
fistyke wrote:Speaking of the ban: eu chiar nu am nimic impotriva (desi e evident cauza banului). Am citit undeva un comentariu la un articol, tipul zicea: "I would ban anything that enables infinite of anything. If you win a game of Magic, win it by actually doing it." Nu e o idee rea :)Problema cu Twinul a fost ca lumea il juca pentru ca oferea deckurilor de control o metoda sa termine jocul instant, avand in vedere ca nu sunt destul de versatile raspunsurile in modern. In foarte multe matchupuri scoteai comboul pentru ca macar in punctul ala stiai ce carti sa aduci din side sa poti interactiona eficient cu adversarul.
juzer wrote:how to print money:
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/news/announcing-eternal-masters-2016-02-15
Rarres wrote:[...] Serios acuma...[/...]