If I am trying to communicate a dispute about receiving undeserved negative feedback, why does the other party get notified? it seems like it would further escalate an unnessecary argument

just wondering, sorry if i posted this in the wrong place

1296228510 wrote:If I am trying to communicate a dispute about receiving undeserved negative feedback, why does the other party get notified? it seems like it would further escalate an unnessecary argument

just wondering, sorry if i posted this in the wrong place

This is just what I would imagine: Both parties would be in talks over the adjudicator of the negative dispute. The other party being notified, in minimal, serves as a notice of events, that they will be contacted over the matter. As far as the argument goes, it takes two to argue. Don't join in. Should the other half badger you don't respond. The dispute is between you and the adjudicator now keep it that way after all that is why the negative feedback is being disputed in the first place.