Search options (Page 16 of 54)

Pending that's the only creature you're attacking with, you would have to sacrifice it as a result of Celestial Flare, leaving no lasting effect from Enlarge and freeing them to block however they like. 

However, as Celestial Flare targets a player, not a creature, and leaves it up to said targeted player to choose which attacking or blocking creature is sacked, odds are you're not just attacking with the Enlarged alone, meaning you could choose one of the other creatures to sacrifice and then they WOULD have to block the Enlarged creature.

Does that make sense?

Simply put, if they remove the creature you cast Enlarge on, then there's nothing there for them to be required to block and, as such, they can block normally (aka however they choose).

If you're looking to go Gruul, the only really viable strategy at the moment is to go the devotion route.

For a look at a deck that's using that strategy, see the following: http://deckbox.org/sets/474989

As you'll note; however, this deck is worth $300.  Perhaps a better strategy would be to move closer to the RDW strategy with a splash of green...

So that deck would look more like this:  http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/deck.asp?deck_id=1171083 but again, you're looking at $180 in cards.  http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/deck.asp?deck_id=1172254 isn't as tested, but is definitely cheaper.

If I were you, I'd probably go with the following:

4 Rakdos Cackler
4 Experiment One
4 Burning-Tree Emissary
4 Firefist Striker
4 Gore-House Chainwalker
4 Ghor-Clan Rampager
2 Ember Swallower
2 Polis Crusher (you could easily swap this with Gruul War Chant likely to better effect)

3 Lightning Strike
3 Madcap Skills
2 Clan Defiance

3 Hammer of Purphoros (you could put Domri, Xenagos, Garruk COB, or Chandra Pyromaster here)

4 Stomping Ground
4 Temple of Abandon
1 Gruul Guildgate
4 Forest
9 Mountain

Again, you can make whatever changes you like, but this comes to 61 cards (so you're free to drop one of something) that will rather consistently put pressure on the opponent.  The lands are easily the most expensive part of the deck and you could likely make do without the Stomping Grounds but again, the Temples are pretty critical.  In terms of cost, at TCG mid you could pick up the whole deck WITH the shocks for about $90.  If you don't fret them, you're looking at $51 using the TCG mid-price.

The deck certainly won't be the best in the world and against tier 1 competition it will likely just lose... but against home brews and such, it probably won't do half bad.  But she's going to have to play pretty aggressively.

Hrm... it's certainly a fragile setup... given that neither is more than a 1/1 and you're relying on it resolving.  That being said, you're going to want to add mana fixing, card draw, and things of that nature.

All that being said, I don't know that I'd really go for it given the fact that you're not going to be able to set it off any earlier than T4 and NEED to draw perfect mana and those three cards.  I mean if you're just wanting to see what the hell happens, go for it... but I would think of some other applications of the three combo cards and build a deck looking for those avenues with the combo as a nice added little trick.  So with Triton Tactics I'm thinking some sort of heroic triggers?  I could see something like Staunch-Hearted Warrior or Centaur Battlemaster getting out of hand.  Triton Fortune Hunter would provide some rather amusing card draw.  Elvish Mystic and Opaline Unicorn could at least start the loop - although they don't really offer any added benefit other than normal ramping/fixing and giving both of them alarmingly high toughnesses...

Yeah... sounds pretty fragile and unreliable... sorry...

It would probably be a good idea to tell us the combo so that we can perhaps think of cards that help supplement/protect it.

I'm not an expert with combo decks but my understanding is that the remainder of the deck is meant to support the combo and to help ensure you draw all the necessary pieces.  So to that end, tutor effects, card draw/advantage, cantrips, stalling spells, things of that nature.

Sadly this is the definition of a "win more" situation where, if you're already sitting on a 5/5 lifelink, trample, double-strike creature, getting a 12/12 Voracious Wurm isn't all that relevant, given that you're likely already winning the game.  It also requires a LOT of things to go correctly for this to work.

I think there's a junk deck in here somewhere, but it's just not there yet.  I'd wait until Born of the Gods because the pairings of Trostani, Selesnya's Voice, Obzedat, Ghost Council, Angelic Accord, and Whip of Erebos are quite powerful...

Okay, so if you're playing in a really competitive environment, I'm going to be 100% frank and honest with you about the builds.  Home-brews or not, if you're in a really competitive environment you need to know some of the basics of deckbuilding.

1) Pick a strategy and stick to it!  This means either going aggro, going midrange, or going control these days.  Do NOT hedge between two of them as it will almost always weaken your ability to do either - making the deck worse than it would be if you simply picked one.  So to this end, you REALLY need to choose, are you going for an aggro strategy or for more of a midrange strategy?  Then stick to that!

2) Consistency, consistency, consistency!  The most competitive decks typically run very few different cards but in high quantities (3-4x of most cards).  The reason for this is because they want to have the best odds of drawing the same sorts of plays every game - allowing them to follow similar lines of play in every game, reducing play mistakes while also maximizing the likelihood of executing the plan.

3) Some cards are just better than others.  I know how tempting it is to take a card that nobody else is using and try to figure out a way to "break the format" with it.  The same can be said for trying to come up with your own unique builds as opposed to looking to what the pros are doing and "net-decking."  As much as it pains me, as a brewer of weird decks myself, there is no reason to reinvent the wheel, so to speak.  Look at what the pros are playing, take their decklists and feel free to modify them to fit what you own and can get your hands on, BUT, simply ignoring what they're doing because "net-decking sucks" is just silly.  They're the best players in the world for a reason and they spend a LOT more time thinking about this stuff than probably 90% of the rest of us.  That being said, if they're not running a card, don't think they simply forgot it, there's probably a reason they're not running it.

4) Mana fixing is expensive, but it is that way for a reason.  If you're sitting on the playset of Stomping Grounds you've already done the hard part.  But Temple of Abandon is pretty huge when it comes to competitive play these days.  It may come in tapped, slowing you down a bit, but the scry ability can keep you from flooding out or drawing repetitive cards that you can't cast.  It's worth it to spend a few extra bucks or to trade to pick up the added mana fixing (although the full playsets of everything aren't required, it's more consistent if you have them all).

So, with those out of the way, to your builds:

1) "Slammed Gruul" - This deck is FAR too disorganized to really have much consistency.  Are you going aggro or mid-range?  If you're aggro, mana dorks are TERRIBLE.  If you're going mid-range, you need to really just follow the R/G Devotion builds and have 4x Burning-Tree Emissary (BTE), Voyaging Satyr, Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx, Garruk, Caller of Beasts and all that jazz.  As it currently sits, very little of this makes much sense given the high number of 1-off cards.  For instance, Legion Loyalist is meant to achieve what exactly (mind you, I know what the card does...)?  Or 1x Bow of Nylea?  Fog seems totally counter to an aggro strategy and would be better suited in mid-range.

2) "Test 1" - This is leaps and bounds better than "Slammed Gruul" but still has a long way to go.  This again is hedged between aggro and mid-range.  If you're going aggro (and hence most of the reason to run Ghor-Clan Rampager and Ogre Battledriver), I would suggest tossing in a LOT more one and two-drop creatures and realistically ending your curve at four.  Drop all the mana dorks and work with things like Experiment One, Firefist Striker, the full slate of BTEs, more Kalonian Tuskers, and Domri Rade.  Drop essentially ALL of your enchantments as the only ones that would matter for such a build are Hammer of Purphoros (it replaces late game land draws with 3/3 haste golems), Madcap Skills, and POSSIBLY Dragon Mantle.

3) "Test 2" - This is also better than "Slammed Gruul" and appears to be adopting the mid-range strategy a bit more.  But it still has a bunch of sub-optimal cards.  Among those I would cut are: Deadbridge Goliath, Ghor-Clan Rampager, Fog, Mending Touch, Alpha Authority, Bow of Nylea, and Purphoros's Emissary.  Others I would consider possibly cutting or maybe moving to the SB depending on how the build shapes up include: Kalonian Tusker, Savageborn Hydra, Scavenging Ooze, Giant Adephage.   Now you're probably thinking to yourself, "That's all of the deck! What in the world goes in there!?!"  Well, Polukranos is a more versatile threat than most of what you're sitting on.  So he should be in there as probably a 3x.  Arbor Colossus is a 6/6 for 5 that can easily become a 9/9 and take out an opposing flyer (which is quite relevant against Desecration Demon and things of the like).  BTE is a devotion generator.  Sylvan Caryatid is easily the best mana dork these days as it can block most aggro threats safely while still adding to the pool.  Also, Garruk, Caller of Beasts provides a HUGE amount of card advantage.  Personally I'm a fan of a few unorthodox things like Clan Defiance to give you an output for all your mana in the later turns.  But more importantly, you have to be sure that you stick to the plan and keep producing big threats (but not so big that a single removal spell screws you over - hence my hesitation about Giant Adephage).

So, there's clearly a lot of room for improvement (sorry) if you're in a super competitive situation.  My suggestion would be to either try to pick up some more of the core pieces for the R/G Devotion deck over time and perhaps scout out a few other FNM spots (if possible) to find a less competitive environment to start or try making incremental improvements to the existing builds, but keep in mind that you need to be okay with losing quite a bit.  Because if I can say one thing, it's that GP/Pro Tour competition would eat these lists quickly and easily given that they're almost all playing the same 8-10 tier 1 tested lists of 75 cards.  Further, to be competitive in those environments, you have to be willing to pony up a bit more cash... today's game is a far cry from when I started in 1993-94 when it really was just "What cards do you have? Yeah, build with those."

If you'd like, I have an R/G Devotion build I've been tinkering with for a while although I haven't playtested it nearly enough to know if it would perform well or not.  In either event, the build can be found here: http://deckbox.org/sets/474989.  I'm hardly a GP winning brewer, but I've taken down enough FNM events in my day to have at least some sense of what I'm doing.  Feel free to take what you like from it and remember, the most important input you can get is from playtesting - it trumps whatever we can tell you in these forums.  So build, playtest, build, playtest, build, playtest, playtest, playtest.

Good luck!

So these are all decks for what? Casual play? FNM? Taking to a Grand Prix?

Are you simply looking for recommendations on which cards to cut?  Or are you open to complete overhauls?

What sort of budget are you looking at to improve the decks?

How competitive is the meta where you will be taking these to play?  Do you have to worry about a bunch of home brews or are you staring down Tier 1 net-decks all day long?

What are the basic win-cons and strategies behind each of the decks?

This is in the sticky about posting in the forum but I guess nobody reads that, so I'll say it again.  You have to give us some information regarding the decks and the questions I've posed above.  The more information you provide, the more likely it is that we can offer some helpful advice/input/critiques.

If you wanted to go another route entirely, it is also possible to abuse Angelic Accord using Orzhov colors (B/W).  Between extort triggers, the lifelink provided by Whip of Erebos, and Obzedat, you'll be dumping angel tokens into play rather easily.  I don't know why it never struck me before and I'm actually going to piece together a build looking at the Whip - Obzedat - Accord combo to see whether it's viable or not.

For what it's worth, you'll certainly have access to better removal that way...

So at the moment Golgari isn't the best plan of attack given that it lacks the scry land in both colors for the fixing.  But that being said, I think there is a niche there to take advantage of the lack of graveyard hate these days.  Yet, your build might perform well in a casual setting (and certainly has the counts to be consistent); however, it is't using any of the ideal cards for the colors.  In particular, here's a list I've been refining for the past few weeks to try and make something competitive http://deckbox.org/sets/464290.

Things you'll note in my build are the improved quality of the four-drops.  Whereas you're sitting on Corpsejack Menace, Golgari Decoy, and Korozda Monitor, I have Desecration Demon, Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord, Polukranos, World Eater, and Reaper of the Wilds.  You can think of the four drop as being the most critical to the plan.

You also would benefit from some more focused removal.  Doom Blade is good, unless you run up against any black deck.  Abrupt Decay, Putrefy, and things of that sort are typically better options.

I would also suggest going to your local FNM to scout out to see how competitive the environment is.  If it's a super hardcore FNM with a lot of tier 1 decks, you'll want to totally overhaul this thing.  If it's a bit more open with a variety of homebrews, well, odds are you will have more fun and it will take less work to make the deck effective.

Anyway, take a gander at the build I proposed and feel free to incorporate whatever components of it you like.

First off, I think there is promise in a Jund build but I don't think it will make the leap to being anything close to tier 1 until we see the other Scry lands in Born of the Gods.

That being said, a few thoughts:

1) There's really no need for Hero's Downfall in here as Dreadbore works sufficiently 95% of the time.  Given that when an opponent plays a PW, they still hold priority and can activate it before you could kill it anyway, why not save the 1 mana and just do it Dreadbore style? (Mind you, I get that you can cast Downfall on an opponent's turn, saving your mana for your turn, but really, it's not THAT big of a deal at the moment).

2) I would actually drop a few of the guildates for just run of the mill lands.  I know they you're trying to maximize the likelihood you hit all your colors as quickly as possible, but the fact guildgates come into play tapped will often leave you a turn behind even when you're hitting your land drops.  The added ability of the Scry lands to let you sift through your top decks justifies the ETB tapped, but otherwise, they'll just slow you down more than you probably want.  So to that end, a full playset of the shocks, perhaps 1-2 guildgates (1 Rakdos, 1 Golgari) and 4 Temple of Abandon should give you access to enough fixing that run of the mill Swamp, Mountain and Forest should get the job done.

3) I can see where you're going to want some number of Abrupt Decays in here.  The number of non-creature permanents it can take out is significant and meaningful.  Think Detention Sphere and Underworld Connections - in addition to dropping an opponent's Boros Reckoner and whatnot.

4) Given the high number of shocks you're running, I don't know that I would run Thoughtseize in the main board and if I did, no more than two.  Odds are you're going to be siding them out a LOT against even moderately aggressive builds as they, combined with the shocks, end up doing half of the opponent's job for them.  To that end, if you're really wanting to look at the opponent's deck/hand, I cannot recommend enough that you use Slaughter Games.  Most people will say, wait, you should be contributing to the board with your four drops, and, while I agree most of the time, a single Slaughter Games will practically neuter both mono-blue and mono-black devotion decks, esper rich kid/superfiends/control, and a LOT of other strategies.  In the worst case scenario, you name a card that you THINK they might have and get to look at their hand and entire deck - that's the kind of information you just cannot overlook in any type of competitive play.  Additionally, Duress in the SB does a solid job against control and doesn't cost the life of Thoughtseize.  So, the tl;dr version, maybe 2x seize in the main, the rest in the SB along with Duress and give a look at Slaughter Games in the main (even 1-2x could be useful) -- I know this is not a popular or widely felt sentiment, but I would argue that it can be huge if played correctly.

5) Anger of the Gods should be in the SB.  I know it wipes out all your dorks, but if you're staring down Rakdos Aggro or something of that nature, you'll happily make the exchange if it can wipe the board of their threats.  It'll go in the SB, but can be quite the useful tool for ya.

6) I'm on the fence about Read the Bones vs. Underworld Connections and would suggest playtesting with both.  The ability to draw more than two cards with UC is great, but digging as many as four cards down with Read strikes me as optimal given your plan.

7) I would suggest upping your count of Whip of Erebos.  You're currently sitting at 10 shocks, 3 Read the Bones, 3 Thoughtseize, and Erebos - that's enough damage to almost kill yourself twice (pending only one activation of Erebos).  Personally, I would slide in at least one more whip as the lifelink really just makes the deck that much harder to deal with and, having run a home brew version of mono-black, you NEVER regret having one on the field.  Even being able to recur threats for a single hit can be huge given the size of most of your creatures.  Nevermind the life swing attached.

8) I can see where I would run some mix of Devour Flesh/Doom Blade/Ultimate Price over the full slate of 4x Putrefy.  I know it seems insignificant, but why pay one more for the same effect 90% of the time?

9) Golgari Charm NEEDS to be in your SB in some number - the enchantment hate alone makes it worthwhile, but the ability to totally clear out RDW's wealth of x/1 creatures en mass is huge.

10) For whatever reason, and perhaps I'm off here, but I could see where Xenagos will have more of an effect for you than Chandra, Pyromaster.  I get that she provides card advantage, but you already can dig with Read, so the mana ramping option could be more useful in a lot of circumstances - fire off that Rakdos's Return with a bit more oomph, etc.

Lastly, I'm a fan of Clan Defiance for it's multi-targeting options, Magma Jet for that added bit of scry to help with your draws, Illness in the Ranks in the SB for dealing with Elspeth/Assemble, and a second Vraska if you can swing it given that she will almost always result in a 2-for-1 or better for you.

Anywhom, I know my responses can be long-winded so hopefully you've gleaned something from all of this mess.

And Jace can do it more than once...