Bump.

Looks nice but do people actually use the deckbox UI (the one on the bottom of your profile) to find traders?  99% of my trades have been from this subforum.

78

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Bump.

80

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Bump.

82

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Bump.

84

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Bump.

86

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

I just thought of another way to go about this: give users the ability to set personal notes on other users that's only visible by you (and maybe your friends).  Basically something to remind yourself of past experiences with other users.

Helios52 wrote:

Bump - added a portion about selling cards....

Add something about eBay sold listing when looking for an asking price.  They generally show how much people would actually pay for a card (i.e. fair market value). 

For example: JTMS
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R4 … &rt=nc

A cursory glance shows multiple listings ending at ~$100, a really good deal at $83, and a couple at $110.  The FTV version seems to be more in demand but they're both within $10 of each other.  So if I were to try selling a FTV Jace, I would set my price depending on how fast I want it gone.  If I want it gone ASAP, I would sell at $100.  If I don't mind waiting, I would set it at $110.

The closest thing to him would be Garruk Relentless so I imagine it would follow a similar trend (http://ark42.com/mtg/pricehistory.php?q … ss&d=0).

He could be good in a midrangey RG list provided that the format is not hyper aggressive.  My intuition is saying that the format will slow down just from a lot of the hasty dudes rotating out (Flinthoof, Mauler, Hellrider, Aristocrat, etc.).  As always, Planeswalkers give UW/Esper a hard time and this is no different. 

I think one of the best way to use him is to activate monstrosities, specifically Ember Swallower.  Consider T2 Caryatid, T3 Swallower, T4 Xenagos -> dude, T5 blow up lands.  Fairly proactive curve and sets other grindy deck backs if uncontested.  However, not something you want to be doing against the aggro decks.

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R4 … &rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_sacat=0 … &rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R4 … &rt=nc

91

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

92

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

93

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

94

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

95

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Rocc wrote:

I have, shocks, oozes and deathrites.  I'm interested in your Misty's Rainforests if they're available.

Possible.  I would expect extra value.  Make an offer.

96

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

97

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Wait, do you want Kiki or have Kiki.  Your wishlist says want Kiki and tl doesn't have one (there is one in inventory though).

99

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

morph66 wrote:

I know i'm trustworthy, other people not so much.

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic.  I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are.

Online trading is all about your rep.  People with higher reps have more to lose with pulling fraudulent trades, namely the ability to trade with that community.  It should be a given that people with nothing to lose (i.e. new members) have to prove themselves to be a contributing member of the community first.  The feedback system isn't perfect and can be gamed so there is no clear-cut solution to prevent any fraud.  The only thing available is deterrence due to the threat of losing access to trading with that community. 

The discussion is at what point has a person sufficiently proven to be a contributing member of the community such that "seniority" is irrelevant in trading?