126

(38 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Beagle wrote:

I cannot stress this enough - this KILLS me.  I take time to find people to trade with and approach them out of the blue, but it's terrible to spend all that time and only find people who haven't been active in forever.

It would be a FANTASTIC addition to this site to be able to sort for matches on your profile (as you are now) with the addition of filters such as:

-  Active in the last [insert time range]
-  Feedback score > [insert number]
-  Local or Mailing trade partner
-  Country = [Insert country or any]

Just having those four filters to narrow the range of profiles I look through would save HOURS - if this is in any way possible, it would be awesome!

This is basically what is already being added.  (Hopefully soon)

127

(38 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Truthfully, at the moment, I'm not too worried about the pain it takes to find a trade.  That's inherent to the process right now, but that process will hopefully be changing to support much of what you guys have suggested (filtering down the trading opportunities in more/different ways).

And I understand completely the process of seeing a trade come in, meaning to come back to it and forgetting that it was sitting there and not responding.  I've been there, done that, and I don't fault people for doing it, or getting upset about it.  I'd suggest that if you don't receive a response at all that you just give it a quick bump a while later by adding another line in the chat to see if the other party is interested or not.  It is easy to forget about trades if you don't constantly look at the page, or if you have a lot of trades going on at once; feel free to lend a helping hand in the memory process.

A little trick that most people might not know is that you can actually see if somebody has viewed the messages that you sent on the trade.  Just like on your trades page, where it shows that you have unread messages on a particular trade, the same can be viewed on other people's trades by going to their profile and then to their Trades page.  Any trades with unread comments will have the comment icon next to them, so you can determine if the other person has even seen your comment or not.

My concern is more with how people handle themselves once a trade is initiated, essentially nullifying that whole process of finding somebody to trade with because they don't talk before taking action.

128

(38 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

UnstableFlux wrote:

I just want to give a shout out to LargeSack who has been working with me on a big trade the past 2 days. Not only have we been going back and forth with our lists, but he has also been searching through his hundreds of thousands of cards for stuff I'm looking for!

Yep, there are definitely people who are willing to work through trades. 

I'd also like to shoutout to Krash who was an awesome trader that worked with me for quite some time to work out a great trade that worked out well for both of us.  One of the best communicators that I've seen here on Deckbox.

Thanks to everybody who has replied; I'm glad to see that there are other people of the same frame of mind.

Also, I'd just like to say that I find it hilarious that I think I've received more trade requests from this post then I do when I actually post looking for trades. big_smile

I've had a great time here on Deckbox, making nearly 150 trades.  Lots of great people to work with and an increasingly helpful community.  That being said, I've been noticing a growing trend lately that has become kind of troubling to me.

I spend a relatively large amount of time tracking down people to trade with; finding people that want my cards and have cards I want.  It can be a very painful process with the current trading system (hopefully that will change a bit in the near future).  Or I see somebody post on the forum about wanting a certain set of cards that I have available and would be more than willing to trade, and I find something on their list that I'm happy to trade for.  I send a trade.
.....
A minute/hour/day/week later it gets canceled; if I'm lucky, maybe with a small message.

Often times I'll ask for clarification, because I'm curious, and the reason given is usually something along the lines that the card(s) are already in another trade, or they don't want to trade down, or trade out of format, or whatever else might be the case.  That is a perfectly acceptable and reasonable statement that I fully understand that you wouldn't/couldn't trade those cards.

But why does that fact mean that those were the only cards that I was interested in?  Why must the the first proposition be exactly what we end with?  Why not take a few minutes to even ask if there is anything else that I'd be interested in, or see if there is anything else you're interested in?  If there's not then you're not out anything.  But if I'd be willing to trade for more/different cards then you just made a trade without having to restart that whole process of tracking people down and/or waiting for offers.

A little more communication will go a long way and make a lot more trades happen, thus lessening the burden of trading in general.

Out of curiosity, what do you value the squirrel tokens at?

HikingStick wrote:

Do you have more details? I'm a T-Mobile user but am able to access the site.

You're able to get to Deckbox using 4G with T-Mobile?  That's odd since I think we're even in the same state.......

Bump.  Anybody happen to have more than like 2 or 3 of these that they could part with as part of a trade?

133

(3 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Go here and put in the text that you wish to appear in your signature.

I have a list of 8 cards that I need to wrap up a couple EDH decks.  They're currently the only cards in my wishlist, but it seems like people don't have most of them on their tradelist so I was hoping that somebody would be able to step up to the plate and hopefully help me out and get a trade that includes most of them all in one shot.

Here's the list of cards that I'm looking for at the moment:
Akki Coalflinger
Call to the Netherworld
Dread Slag
Howltooth Hollow
Infernal Tutor
Outmaneuver
Soulbright Flamekin
Vivid Crag



Note: I'm more than willing to do trades for larger things as well, these are just my priorities at the moment, and if you bring those to the table and see something else that you want from me then I'd be more than willing to discuss other possibilities as well.

Thanks!

135

(150 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

There is already this functionality available.

When you hover over a row in your Inventory, an icon will appear next to the name of the card like this: http://i.imgur.com/XusKTyX.png

Clicking on that icon will popup more information about the card, which includes a tab that has all of the deck information.
http://i.imgur.com/lAYoqKo.png

One more click than what you're suggesting, but it definitely doesn't take an additional page load and I haven't had any issues with it.

136

(1 replies, posted in Communities)

From the main Deckbox site (not forum) go to the People link in the top navbar.
In the left column is a link to Create a new community.

Intriguing foils, eh? ..... I have a foil Gush from MM. big_smile

138

(24 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Vincentarasin wrote:

Also, I just had it confirmed. I will have Dragons Maze FP's smile

I was on the edge, but now I can't resist.  Let me know when you get those and I'll definitely take one, possibly more.

139

(3 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Generally it is very difficult and expensive to get delivery confirmation across borders like that.  I believe that people have stated that it costs a minimum of $15 to get the delivery confirmation, and even then it isn't always trustworthy.

I've done a few trades to Canada from the US and haven't had any issues with shipping (though it might take a while longer than normal).  That being said, I, personally, wouldn't trade with somebody across borders who doesn't have an extensive trade history because you really need to trust that they're not going to screw you over.

Deckbox just currently has an arbitrary limit of 75 cards for deck size, except for EDH.  Just ignore the error, and maybe post in the Suggestions forum stating that it isn't valid.

141

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

There is an update in the works to redo the trade interface to support this type of functionality.  It will hopefully be released sometime in the near future, whenever the crew can get it all worked out.

So are you just looking to trade stuff for stuff to change up your binder, or are you only specifically looking for the cards in your wishlist?

143

(13 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

sebi wrote:

We're especially now thinking of inventory privacy, I think I'm leaning more in favor to allowing password protected inventories.

I would love having that that type of option, but please make it exactly that, an option.

If somebody wants their inventory to be private, so be it, but in a lot of cases people don't care and it will end up being a big hinderance.  For instance, if I want to help somebody with their deck, I would need to get their inventory password just to go look at what cards they have to better improve it.  Or if I want to tell somebody to look through my inventory if they didn't see anything they liked in my tradelist.

Things like that would make it a big nuisance to deal with if it wasn't an option.

Another possibility would be to make access friend based, so that only people that you see as friends could see your inventory.  That would kind of give the best of both worlds.  You wouldn't have to continually ask for/enter passwords to do a lot of the standard actions, you'd just need to make sure that you're friends with the people that you're trying to interact with.

The problem is that we don't know which cards belong to those undefined sets, and displaying that option for EVERY card doesn't make sense either.  For something like Giant Growth, that has twenty+ different editions, it probably doesn't matter much.  But to also list all of the unknown sets for something that is only in one set would just clog up the UI more than anything else.  For example:
http://i.imgur.com/7lju7CQ.png

Not to mention that it could easily lead to confusing situations where people can easily select editions of cards that don't even apply.

I'm pretty sure that all of the data is just scraped from Gatherer.  There's nothing that can be done unless you want to petition Wizards to update with all editions of the cards, which probably won't happen at this time.

I'm still hoping that, at some point in time, Deckbox will get updated to pull information from http://magiccards.info instead/in addition to Gatherer, but I've received conflicting reports on the possibility of that happening, and there is definitely no timeline for that to occur.

Deckbox gets all of its data from the official Gatherer website.  The deckmasters set does exist, so you didn't buy a fake card or anything, but it isn't listed on Gatherer, so Deckbox doesn't show it.

147

(24 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

How much for just the contents (with shipping)?

Yep, I've had the same problem on T-Mobile.  Luckily I'm just always around WiFi.

149

(2 replies, posted in Trading Post)

You should fill out your wishlist, so we actually know what you want.

Sadly, I just traded away my other Stomping Grounds.  I still have one though if you're interested, so if you see something else that might make up the difference feel free to send me a trade.  Thanks!