You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Deckbox Forum » Posts by jakehash
sort of on/off topic. Any reason why using deckbox on Iphone is horrible? it shouldnt be an issue since you stated that you use it on ipod.
im not having too many problems i just have to double click some stuff
jakehash wrote:im using chrome on my ipod
Good man!
Just tried on firefox on my PC and had the same issue, chrome works fine
so its a firefox issue
Please provide a bit more information, particularly which browser you were using when you had problems.
I use Chrome and it works fine. You iPod is likely using Safari (or a variant of it).
im using chrome on my ipod and firefox on my laptop and my laptop is the one that wont let me confirm
is anyone else having this trouble i can put my address in the type box but then when that pop up shows and says are you sure this is your address i try hitting ok and it doesnt do anything but then when i do it through my ipod it works fine ... anyone having this problem?
bumping
still looking
I have a few things you want but how do you determine there value?
Would like to know as well
Are you interested in a Korean Hallowed Fountain?
Don't mind at all
Bump
Bump bump bump, bump it up
im looking for any of the fetch lands (zendikar or onslaught) except marsh flats an arid mesa I only need one of each and im also looking for
1 breeding pool
1 stomping ground
1 watery grave
1 sacred foundry
1 blood crypt
and any revised dual lands
here is my tradelist: http://deckbox.org/sets/114675?s=i&o=d
i have traded with him before and he was good on that trade and also i have a trade set up with him and no comment sense the 10th and all his trades he has to go through i can understand why there has been no comment in a while
Well said; however, a confirmed trade should still have the resemblance of a contract, no? Metaphorically speaking, when a trade is first initiated, it is similar to the first rounds of negotiation on a business contract. As the trade offer is modified by both parties and being discussed in the chat box, the metaphor would continue in through the next rounds of negotiations within a contract. Finally after both parties have come to terms with the trade or contract, they accept the trade/sign the contract. With respect to the contract, they enter a legally binding agreement that upholds them to their signature; however, deckbox lacks discouragement for the breaking of this trade.
I do believe good communication is definitely key to facilitating a deal (I believe I do communicate pretty well in my trades), but the proper restraints are definitely an issue too. In the past month, I believe there have been a couple of cases of traders going rogue(either failing to communicate, offering ultimatums or just not sending). Though I'm certainly not saying that these cases could have been avoided 100% but isn't it always better to look for ways to innovate the trading system to help trader safety?
Wouldn't putting your mailing info be more like signing? Accepting the trade would be more like accepting the contract ... In my opinion anyway
Ya I feel like this is a legit reason although an explanation should have been given as to why it was canceled when it was and as for pricing if you click on the card (if it's older) there will e the actual price on the bottom of the page and if not there is a link to it. But like I said I feel like this is ok considering this guy is new to deckbox and didnt know that the pricing was screwed up.
What kind of Shocklands are you looking for?
for the most part stomping ground, breeding pool, godless shrine
but all offers are welcome
Title says it
Trade list: http://deckbox.org/sets/114675?s=i&o=d
Offer sent
What do you value the sliver deck at
I have one I would trade
bumping
I would be interested if I have stuff you want
bump
To me, this is a bit worrisome due to the following... Upon looking at Ichorclaw's profile there is absolutely NOTHING that jumps out at me as any sort of indicator of bad or even "iffy" trading history. All I see is "Feedback:+37 out of 38 completed mail trades" and the fact that he changed his status to read, "Family issues, no longer trading." I think this really illustrates that fact that we need to migrate towards a more detailed feedback system, one that's not just a simple top-level +/-1.
There should be ratings for how prompt someone is at sending out their cards, with a 5-star being the same/next day and a 1-star being a week later or... never.
There should be ratings for packaging, with a 5-star being in top-loaders in a bubble mailer and a 1-star being in a zip lock bag inside a regular envelop.
There should be ratings for communication, with 5-stars as all pertinent info provided and questions answered and 1-star being that you agreed on a trade then didn't hear from the guy again for 2-weeks.These are the things I want to know when potentially trading with someone.
this ^
Still have heard nothing
Deckbox Forum » Posts by jakehash