You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Deckbox Forum » Posts by Chaim
I will start on a readonly alpha version after this release, even if it's just going to be authentication and fetching a user's list of sets.
Sounds nice. Will it be available to devs in general?
Also, would it be able to have a plaintext set export?
Chaim wrote:For the record, I have a few cards listed as poor condition, when really they are M/NM, Misprint - Ink Blotches. That is one of the reasons that I would really like freeform tags/labels.
Would this be better solved by just having a free form notes field on the card?
For this case, probably.
It's supposed to. See here.
It is not possible yet. See this thread.
I really want to see the additional inventories but I also really want to see the free form tags. The inventories alone won't suffice for everything. That would keep things too distinct for some cases. The tags don't keep things distinct enough in some cases. Both seem to be a good mix and could solve most wants.
I definitely agree with this.
I prefer freeform tags simply because there are other tags, like "misprinted" (or for misprint collectors, different kinds of tags explaining how they're misprinted), that would be useful---and "promo" or "textless" really, since those are now given by the card's printing.
For the record, I have a few cards listed as poor condition, when really they are M/NM, Misprint - Ink Blotches. That is one of the reasons that I would really like freeform tags/labels.
And if we end up getting multiple inventories, we should also get an "All Inventories" view/option/set/whatever you want to call it.
Yep, add widget is getting some love after this release, there are some things that need ironing out.
One thing I've noticed is I use my sideboard as a "maybeboard," or a way to keep track of cards that I might want to consider using in the deck.
You mean I'm not the only one? 
This prevents me from having an actual sideboard, and also throws off the value calculation for cards in the deck. It would be awesome if each deck had a third section for storing "maybe" cards.
Sounds like a nice idea, and a nice feature that I have not seen in any deck builder yet.
I'm done with scraping the site for info and keeping up with deckbox.org updates.
BTW: you can use the print feature. the link format is as follows:
http://deckbox.org/sets/<set number>/export
so my wishlist is
http://deckbox.org/sets/406621/export
and one of my decks is*
http://deckbox.org/sets/658234/export
get the text (not the html) of the page.
Does this help?
*You will need to strip a little bit from the ones for decks
It is currently impossible to exclude the "variant" option when searching decks. This means that I cannot exclude EDH decks. Any chance this could be fixed?
Additionally, it would be nice to exclude decks that do not contain land. There seems to be a lot of people who build EDH decks, but don't include land, so they register as Legacy or Vintage.
Thanks.
+1
I just encountered a bug for the first time. I had clicked my address and accepted said address in a trade. instead it comes up with a box saying i need to put in an address. with no ability to do so.
http://deckbox.org/trades/211948?s=47554
thats the trade. I will probably start another trade with the guy. to resolve this sooner than not.
Select the "add an address." That will pop up an option to add an address.
Not sure yet how to make it so you can indicate which filters you want to NOT see in the inventory listing, but thinking about it.
Add a search and put filter as an option.
I also think that it should be possible to make some labels public, and some private.
For example: "Misprint" or "Currently Trading" I'd want public, but "Shelf 2, Box 5" or "Garage" I'd want private.
In the deck builder, some Enchantment Creatures (or maybe all of them, I haven't tested them all) are sorting into the Enchantment section. I think it's probably reasonable that Enchantment Creatures should sort like Artifact Creatures--into the Creature section.
The two I've noticed are Perplexing Chimera and Thassa, God of the Sea.
I've noticed this as well.
It is true of all 83 enchantment creatures (including Lucent Liminid).
The THS/BTG/JOU Heros too.
I don't seem to have this problem. Can you give more details and/or pictures?
Incidentally, Exava, Rakdos Blood Witch and Darksteel Forge.
Sylvan Primordial is now also banned in EDH.
To clarify:
You are requesting that the Interesting Cards For Trade match your will trade setting?
How do I add one of each to my wish list? On each of those linked pages I just clicked the My Collection view, edit and added one to my wish list. But after doing that it appears I just want 2 Brothers Yamakuzi, no information on which ones I want. You might be able to pull up the two different cards in the card database but the collection data doesn't distinguish between them.
I just confirmed this, you are correct. I filed a bug report here.
Brothers Yamazaki has a weird glitch. (See here.)
Also, the collector's numbers should be 160a and 160b, not both 160. (I suspect that this may be what is causing the glitch.)
Just like you can't select which brother yamakuzi you have.
Actually, you can. One The other one
Correction: You can only select which one in certain places.
How does one tell the difference between the 2007 Judge Vindicate and the 2013 Judge Vindicate?
The collectors number for the 2007 one is #31; for the 2013 one, #78.
2007:
2013:
The 2013 one is missing from Deckbox.
I would cut red, mill, and Xathrid Necromancer. I would then add 4 Endless Ranks of the Dead.
Chaim wrote:I would recommend adding a few Archetype of Courage.
In the place of what were you thinking?
Maybe instead of one Eidolon of Countless Battles and one Hopeful Eidolon?
I would recommend adding a few Archetype of Courage.
1. What is the general idea behind this deck? It seems somewhat unfocused.
2. What is the approximate budget?
Deckbox Forum » Posts by Chaim
