Hey hey, this is an awesome change that I fully welcome! I have always just kind of reminded myself that some of my more valuable cards were 'a bit' or 'a lot' less than the listed price, particularly when sorting by most valuable. This gives me a much more realistic view at a glance what the actual value of those cards is. This change has also corrected the order that my highest valued cards are displayed in. I wholeheartedly approve of this and am so glad you implemented this change!

2

(7 replies, posted in Announcements)

Thanks for being on top of things as always!

Hoping I can pick up a few of these packs to play against friends a couple times. It looks like the best iteration of this format since the initial M21 Jumpstart release.

3

(27 replies, posted in Announcements)

Thank you thank you! I love the prompt support sebi!

4

(19 replies, posted in Announcements)

This is great work to have focused on! I noticed a change in collection value a week or so ago and assumed it was related to low value cards based on what i could find in my collection. Thank you for the effort! Ive seen several reports of folks being frustrated at price discrepancies on here. I am glad to see some of that being addressed, but perhaps it was never being reported to begin with. Can fix what you dont know is broken. Thanks again for all the hard work!

5

(10 replies, posted in Announcements)

Thank you for your efforts! That's awesome!

6

(8 replies, posted in Announcements)

scramasax_exchange wrote:

I think it was some cold foil

scramasax wrote:

Nice. I already classified my first batch and was ready to enter them. 

There is again a  new feature on cards to screw up classification.  There is some embossing on the border. This is not tool marks. From Draft booster I got 6/22 plains with embossing to give you an idea about number. While looking at the card on the table we don't see the difference. You can feel it when handling the card and while moving it at light the raised part of the card will reflect the light a little more because of edges  but we are far from foil reflection.

I believe what you are talking about is a glossy border on the lands, similar to what the Japanese MID eternal night lands had on them. The American (and possibly Belgian, unconfirmed on this) printing of the MID lands had a finish on the borders of the lands and the other black and white showcase art that actually dulled the color of the borders. The Japanese borders were very color-rich and saturated under the glossy border treatment.

I, personally, would not consider this a different type of card. It's just an unfortunate treatment that differs from what was clearly the goal. The glossy seems like what would have been the goal since the American printing looks so absolutely uninteresting.

7

(5 replies, posted in Announcements)

sebi wrote:

-
- imported MH2 etched foils

Thank you! I missed this in the chaos of August! I have a ton of cards to enter now! Thank you for settling on a resolution for it. And I guess we need to be prepared for like etched foils from every future set coming up, too!

8

(50 replies, posted in Announcements)

scramasax wrote:

I would prefer a flag.  When we are importing cards it is faster to click a flag than to go to the set list and type the extension for cards that have many extension

When filtering cards from a set to know if we have a copy.  If we need to select  multiple things for the same set it   is also a problem because we might think we are missing a card and buy it again because we forgot to add the other name of the set.

I agree completely with this line of thought, I think a flag is the most logical way to approach etched foils. I definitely don't want to have to add multiple sets when searching what i have from what set either.

Also - thanks for your prompt database updates. it is phenomenal work and im impressed every time i use this site at how well managed it is.