Yes that is the trade. And yes I received my end. The issue I'm having is that for a few days after it was shown delivered via tracking, he continued to say he hadn't received the package.
Edit: It shows delivered on 10/22/14.
1 2014-11-04 19:04:09
Re: Tracking shows delivered. No response from recipient. (6 replies, posted in General Discussion)
2 2014-11-04 18:49:51
Topic: Tracking shows delivered. No response from recipient. (6 replies, posted in General Discussion)
What's my best bet in a situation like this? The package shows delivered quite some time ago.
3 2014-04-02 14:30:57
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
three_toe wrote:
Mnemonic wrote:Also, why would you cancel your existing trades, is it really that difficult to open another browser to reference prices during this TCGPlayer dilemma? I feel sorry for the people that were trading were you.
I know, right? HOW DID ANYONE EVER TRADE ONLINE BEFORE THIS DEVASTATING CATASTROPHE?!?!?!
Deckbox team, you could take the position of: Our service was so convenient and useful, that people forgot how to live without it...
I will be the first to admit that this is true for me. It's a lot of the reason I'm so upset. There was a time in my life when I didn't have a vehicle of my own. Now that I do, if it were suddenly taken from me, yes I would live. But you can be damned sure that I'd be amazingly annoyed. 
4 2014-04-02 14:28:33
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
Helios52 wrote:
No, a valid reaction is " Im going to hold off trading/selling for the moment until this gets fixed to an acceptable level". Saying the site is "nearly unusable" is overreactive to the everything else deckbox does that those MANY other forums do not.
I also think that how each person uses the site is variable. So what is unusable for one person is perfectly fine for another.
5 2014-04-02 14:01:23
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
Helios52 wrote:
Website is nearly unusable as is...
This is the most overreactive statement Ive seen. The fact that all your cards and decks are still listed and stored in once place means nothing? Trading didnt stop. Is it really that much extra work to have an extra browser window open next to deckbox to TCG or SCG or ebay or mtgprice or wherever to do a quick search of the current price of a card? Sure this is an extra step in the process but honestly, if you are that concerned about having the most current price of a card when completing a trade/sale, this should be something done regardless if a price generated automatically or an idea in your head on how much its worth.
Im honestly shocked by the amount of negativity and the lack of patience some people have.
Actually, that seems like a pretty valid reaction. If we're just going to use other browser windows to check pricing anyway, why use Deckbox at all? Why not use one of the MANY other forums that exist. One of the features that drew people to trading here was the instantly accessible pricing information for both sides of the trade. That feature is currently not gone. This makes the website amazingly less useful than it was just 24 hours ago.
6 2014-04-02 13:52:24
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
jassi007 wrote:
dorvaan wrote:sebi wrote:I have answered this above. We cannot remain in our current form.
What research or user surveying was done before deciding on the market? I've looked back through announcements and forums, and I see nothing about it before it was announced.
I don't think anyone said they ever did surveys or research? I think the point she's making is they were going to monetize the site or shut it down because it was to much work to do for free anymore, and hooking up people that have cards and people looking for cards to buy/sell as an alternative to trade seems more natural than just charging for a membership or something.
This is my point. Typically, if you're going to start a business model, you do some research beforehand. I'm just curious to learn the thought process. Because it seems that it was done without research or surveying, and now has the very real potential to bite them. I hope that it ultimately doesn't, but it's undeniable that the potential is there.
7 2014-04-02 13:46:29
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
Kammikaze wrote:
If everybody stopped complaining and left sebi and the rest of the DB team alone they would have more time to fix the issues. They know what they need to do. Let them do it. In the meantime, go outside or something. Or go back to work...like me
By all means, people! Do not voice your opinions!
8 2014-04-02 13:43:41
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
sebi wrote:
rixan wrote:It was completely avoidable...just dont do the market. They performed the same business practice you the same as you would bully them if they stood up a direct competitor to you while using all of your data to make your site remotely functional.
I have answered this above. We cannot remain in our current form.
What research or user surveying was done before deciding on the market? I've looked back through announcements and forums, and I see nothing about it before it was announced.
9 2014-04-02 13:42:40
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
sebi wrote:
gumgodMTG wrote:I'm hoping that this change actually allows Deckbox to move away from the restrictions of TCG player and accommodate more of the promos & cards that were not previously listed.
There are coming next week!
That's great to hear. But, really? Getting promos listed is high on the priority list right now?
10 2014-04-02 12:36:48
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
Number1TheLarch wrote:
I don't understand the negativeness.
The negativity is coming from the fact that there was no warning. There was no survey to see what users of the site wanted to do. There was no transition period. We woke up this morning, and it was "SURPRISE! The site is currently broken. Trading as you once knew it doesn't work anymore. Wheeee!"
11 2014-04-02 11:53:39
Re: Site-wide card pricing changes (197 replies, posted in Announcements)
Well, if early indicators are to believed, this is probably going to end very badly.
12 2014-03-24 18:17:11
Re: Release 3.0: Deckbox Market (92 replies, posted in Announcements)
sebi wrote:
Also note, the x% of tcgplayer setting is just to pre-fill prices. It does not continuously update prices, just sets them once. If you want to keep them up to date, you have to do it manually, or re-set them via the dialog.
I think this is a VERY important distinction. It's probably worth putting in the rules, as this isn't how I interpreted it, and judging by some of the other posts, I don't think others are either.
Thank you for clarifying, however.
13 2014-03-24 18:04:48
Re: Release 3.0: Deckbox Market (92 replies, posted in Announcements)
It might be a small wording issue, but I'd like to get verification. Our initial $10 payment is stated to be returned on the first bill. To accumulate $10 in fees, we'd need about $144 in sales. If we don't have that much in our first month, will the credit carry over?
I would also like to know what the 6.9% will be going towards.
Last but not least, since we have the option to set our prices to a percentage of TCGPlayer Average, will this be update sooner/more often than it is now?
14 2014-02-13 17:14:41
Topic: H: 3x LotV, 4x Mutavault (Morningtide), Tropical Island W: Wishlist (0 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
I'm looking to trade these cards for other cards I need. I'm not interested in trading them down (for the most part). Take a look at my lists, and see if we can work anything out.
15 2014-01-30 15:25:41
Topic: H: Tropical Island + Tradelist W: Volcanic Island (0 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Title is straightforward. Willing to trade value since I'm going up.
16 2014-01-19 19:32:23
Topic: H: Tropical Island, LED, Tradelist W: Volcanic Island, Wishlist (0 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Looking to build Sneak and Show. I am only willing to trade the Tropical Island towards Volcanic Islands.
17 2014-01-17 20:20:31
Re: H: Tropical Island x2, FoW x2, Natural Order W: Sneak & Show Pieces (2 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Obviously, it would depend on pricing, but I'd like to trade for whatever I can get.
18 2014-01-17 16:38:04
Re: W: modern hatebears, legacy storm, Snapcaster, more H: tradelist (18 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Trade discussion started.
19 2014-01-17 16:09:25
Topic: H: Tropical Island x2, FoW x2, Natural Order W: Sneak & Show Pieces (2 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Priority Wants:
Volcanic Island
Jace, the Mind Sculptor
Show & Tell
Sneak Attack
Misdirection
I have pictures of the Tropical Islands on my profile page.
20 2014-01-14 15:41:58
Topic: H: Scalding Tarn/Misty/Sphinx Rev. W: Emrakul/Sneak'n'Show Pieces (0 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Take a look at my tradelist, and see what we can work out.
21 2013-12-02 16:30:27
Topic: H: True-Name Nemesis 2x, List W: Bloodstained Mire, Linvala, List (2 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
I have a 2x TNN I'm looking to trade.
22 2013-11-19 21:39:34
Re: H: SDCC PW Set, Scrubland, List W: Volc Island, Trop Island, JTMS,List (2 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Up
23 2013-11-18 20:15:24
Topic: H: SDCC PW Set, Scrubland, List W: Volc Island, Trop Island, JTMS,List (2 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Looking to trade my set of SDCC Planeswalkers for some Legacy goodness.
24 2013-11-01 18:01:31
Re: Can't import CSV files (10 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I'm having the same issue. I tried uploading the file attached, and I am getting the server error.
25 2013-10-29 14:45:44
Topic: H: Scrubland + Value W: Bayou (0 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Also looking for Bloodstained Mires.