Thanks for adding this! I had started using tags to track the game changers in my decks.

eternallostboy0425 wrote:

I was also searching an answer for this.  Is there a way to search for multiple words in search criterias for cards?

Like anywhere in the rules text it contains any 2 words I am searching for... is that possible?

I've wondered this, too, and figured it just wasn't possible

Posting and subscribing to see any responses smile

sebi wrote:

Added new deck formats and legality checks: ...

Amazing! Thank you so much.

sebi wrote:
shrewder wrote:

Thanks. I'm interested in the bolded part above. Do you do this manually (row by row)?

You can filter the entire tradelist for the tag, then select all on the page, and you'll get an option after that to "select all filtered rows". Then you can remove all of them via the "card actions" dropdown.

So simple. Thanks!

mrcelophane wrote:

I am interested if there is a better way than what I am about to describe, because I too am new to these features and am just starting to get into trading. Haven't completed one yet, and of course the first one I try, something (minor) went wrong so now its delayed. Anyway...

Yes, use "Auto mark unused for trade". I also created a "Do-not-trade" tag for items I know will be put into a deck soon. So you can press the auto-trade button, then immediately filter your trade list by the do not trade tag, and remove those from the list.

Thanks. I'm interested in the bolded part above. Do you do this manually (row by row)?

I grabbed the premium account for the first time and I'm learning how to leverage some of the features that were unlocked. One of the features I was excited to use was the deckbuilder's "Built Deck" flag to mark inventory as "in use". While useful for a lot of reasons, I had secretly hoped that "in use" would also remove a card from the tradelist. I see that is not the case.

So I'm wondering... What's the best approach if I'd like to remove in-use cards from the tradelist but otherwise mark everything else for trade?

Do I need to approach it from the opposite perspective and unmark everything for trade and then use the "Auto mark unused for trade"?

Price manipulation of the source system is a real thing, unfortunately.
MTGStocks even shows it at the same price (market) (link)

If you go to the source - TCG - you can see a "sale" on Sep 23 for $0.03
When their calculation updates the price, it will cascade through to other systems, like MTGStocks and Deckbox

derBishoff wrote:

Should we be worried?

You should definitely be worried... about the pace and variety WotC produces cards at these days

Poor Sebi

10

(5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

mtghoard wrote:

Very handy though!

No kidding! Once I consolidate everything, I will probably move my deck management here, too. The proxies were the blocker for me.

11

(1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

The bundle copy is the foil, and you need to select the foil treatment when entering it. It should be cheaper than the variant that is not foil. The non-foil bundle art was available in collectors packs.

12

(5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

mtghoard wrote:

Proxies are already available - they are a 'condition' of a card, rather than being in the foiled/etc options.

Any card set with a 'condition' of 'proxy' is worth 0.00, this seems like a pretty neat way to do things.

I also make a lot of use of this, as I fill in gaps in my collection for expensive cards using proxies, given that I'm not made of money and don't play any 'sanctioned' games.

omg I've never looked that hard at that menu

13

(5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I keep a second account on here for my proxies. It's not ideal, but it allows me to keep an inventory of them that doesn't pollute my real cards.

When I need to know my real total of cards, I have a spreadsheet that combines the CSVs from each account and spits out an aggregate across printing types.

14

(25 replies, posted in Announcements)

Very nice! Thanks a ton

15

(2 replies, posted in General Discussion)

IUTBF wrote:
shrewder wrote:

Is there a syntax to search for the tap symbol in the rules text search filter?

t:

Just now seeing this. Thanks for the recommendation, but it only returned that literal 't:' response. It did not pull back something like Avacyn's Pilgrim.

After a little experimenting, I found that {t} works.

16

(4 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I am dealing with the same response. My bet is that it is truly on the server side, so we will need to wait for Sebi to fix things.

Prerelease promo of Bloomburrow's Darkstar Augur is missing

https://scryfall.com/card/pblb/90s/darkstar-augur

18

(2 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Is there a syntax to search for the tap symbol in the rules text search filter?

Hello! I assume you read this:

https://www.channelfireball.com/article … e9f08da14/

My main problem with this is that it falls apart when you try to recast your commander... for two more mana. You aren't going to avoid multiple slots in the curve.

With that in mind, I definitely try to lessen the density in my high-cost commanders' curve slots. For example, my Be'lakor deck with its 6-mana commander tries to avoid running more 6-mana demons. I try to focus the supporting cast on the cheap side to maximize his initial EtB or in the 7+ to maximize his subsequent EtB.

But I'm building a Lavinia, Azorius Renegade deck and will not be cutting Arcane Denial because it has the same CMC.

Amazing! Do I see correctly that non-premium users will get TCG Market?

Some two-sided tokens from Karlov:

Detective (0010) // Dog (0001)
Detective (0010) // Thopter (0019)
Detective (0010) // Spider (0011)
Detective (0010) // Ooze (0008)
Thopter (0020) // Ooze (0008)

22

(4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Try 'Add More Filters > Printing Details > Edition Owned'

Thanks!

copper_age wrote:

Missing prerelease stamped Bedrock Tortoise

Let's errata that thing out of existence, says I, the person who went 2-1 and lost to that frigging turtle neutral

Thank you!