When Wizards actually invalidates codes by requiring LGS's to enter them to some site, then it'll stop.

jassi007 wrote:When Wizards actually invalidates codes by requiring LGS's to enter them to some site, then it'll stop.

Agreed. This shouldn't even be a problem in the first place.

timesnewspartan wrote:Tone it down a little bit, Walter Whiteknight.

Obviously, it's wrong to trade codes but I don't think banning everybody the first time they do something wrong is really called for. That's why suspension is a thing. I think suspension is the right way to go here. If he does it again, ban him for good and label him a scammer. Seems like the most reasonable way of going about this.

Dude, could you just be a little bit more respectful here. I don't think the name calling is really necessary in this instance. My point was that he did something that is very obvious wrong, was called out on it, and still maintained his right to "scam"

This isn't some small thing here, this is blatant theft with complete lack of remorse once being caught. He knew full well it was a scam, he just didn't see the harm in it. That's dangerous.

Was wondering why this topic blew up last night.

Thanks for all the guys who were heads up about this. I didn't even know the code abuse existed

morph66 wrote:

timesnewspartan wrote:Tone it down a little bit, Walter Whiteknight.

Obviously, it's wrong to trade codes but I don't think banning everybody the first time they do something wrong is really called for. That's why suspension is a thing. I think suspension is the right way to go here. If he does it again, ban him for good and label him a scammer. Seems like the most reasonable way of going about this.

Dude, could you just be a little bit more respectful here. I don't think the name calling is really necessary in this instance. My point was that he did something that is very obvious wrong, was called out on it, and still maintained his right to "scam"

This isn't some small thing here, this is blatant theft with complete lack of remorse once being caught. He knew full well it was a scam, he just didn't see the harm in it. That's dangerous.

If I'm not mistaken, you were suspended at one point for abusive language. By your logic, you should be banned.

*Sigh* Can we get this locked again...

timesnewspartan wrote: If I'm not mistaken, you were suspended at one point for abusive language. By your logic, you should be banned.

If there is a contentious topic morph will be there. Moth, flame, etc.

timesnewspartan wrote:

morph66 wrote:

timesnewspartan wrote:Tone it down a little bit, Walter Whiteknight.

Obviously, it's wrong to trade codes but I don't think banning everybody the first time they do something wrong is really called for. That's why suspension is a thing. I think suspension is the right way to go here. If he does it again, ban him for good and label him a scammer. Seems like the most reasonable way of going about this.

Dude, could you just be a little bit more respectful here. I don't think the name calling is really necessary in this instance. My point was that he did something that is very obvious wrong, was called out on it, and still maintained his right to "scam"

This isn't some small thing here, this is blatant theft with complete lack of remorse once being caught. He knew full well it was a scam, he just didn't see the harm in it. That's dangerous.

If I'm not mistaken, you were suspended at one point for abusive language. By your logic, you should be banned.

To be fair, theft and verbal abuse are two very different things.

But I agree, this is getting out of hand.

UnstableFlux wrote:*Sigh* Can we get this locked again...

How did it get unlocked...

I think Sebi forgot to lock after he unlocked to post in it? Or maybe he just left it unlocked on purpose :(

timesnewspartan wrote:

morph66 wrote:

timesnewspartan wrote:Tone it down a little bit, Walter Whiteknight.

Obviously, it's wrong to trade codes but I don't think banning everybody the first time they do something wrong is really called for. That's why suspension is a thing. I think suspension is the right way to go here. If he does it again, ban him for good and label him a scammer. Seems like the most reasonable way of going about this.

Dude, could you just be a little bit more respectful here. I don't think the name calling is really necessary in this instance. My point was that he did something that is very obvious wrong, was called out on it, and still maintained his right to "scam"

This isn't some small thing here, this is blatant theft with complete lack of remorse once being caught. He knew full well it was a scam, he just didn't see the harm in it. That's dangerous.

If I'm not mistaken, you were suspended at one point for abusive language. By your logic, you should be banned.

actually to be fair i was suspended for being rude and probably condescending. I made amends and was unbanned long beofre it was due to be over. I am attempting at turning over a new leaf, I am not really sure why you are throwing it in my face. I don't see how this is the same as stealing hundreds of dollars from users here. Oh well, you have the right to your opinion. I just don't get the point of pointing out my previous flaws of being rude, when you are name calling here and being just as rude. It's a tad hypocritical from where i'm sitting. My intention here was obviously a good one and the looking out for feelow members. I hope you try to curb your opion and see it for what it was.

Anyways hugs and kisses for everyone. If I offended anyone here for reporting this then I apologize as well. I re-read everything I posted to stay PC and not be rude. Let's just let this die and get back to some trading :)

morph66 wrote: Good ridance to trash and hopefully they aren't allowed to come back due to the lack of remorse.

I'm the only one name-calling, though.
You're not as high and mighty as you think you are.

This thing definitely got out of hand real fast. But I actually enjoyed this. What a fun read this morning lol.

I've alerted the mods to come and lock this again :/

I wasn't sure if Sebi meant to leave it open or not since he seemed to be looking for feedback. But, either way, it has escalated into something else so I'll try to close this again.

Thanks for your cooperation.