Search options (Page 4 of 8)

Is there only going to be a single "price" going forward? We used to have Min and Mid pricing (and high, but no one used that). It sounds like you're going to collect a lot of (awesome) price info, and have some graphs and stuff which will be cool, but can you say if the current plan is to move towards a single price, or still allow folks to use different pricing mechanisms for trades?

Keep up the great work, and I'm thrilled to resume trading!

Almost all of the cards, especially lower value cards, have a price of zero for me. There's no way I'm going to individually look up prices of dozens of <$1 cards, and then negotiate manually over them with a trading partner, so the site essentially becomes useless for me until then -- trust in a price is what makes the system work. If people can't trust the prices, trading (and buying) basically grinds to a halt for most folks. This isn't really a happy tradeoff for most of us in exchange for the marketplace feature. I think almost everyone sees would see this as a worse version of deckbox than the one we had two weeks ago. Hopefully your plans to fix this come about soon, and most importantly, hopefully the prices are ones that the community as a whole can buy into. Bad or unstable prices are worse than no prices.

Best of luck!

would just the standard feedback process work? If a seller cancels an order, and the buyer feels like it was due to a price spike, he could ask mods for permission to leave negative feedback? Then buyers would see certain sellers have low feedback and wouldn't be as likely to follow through. Some certain number of negatives would lead to ban from selling?

Agreed. And I like and miss the ability to trade out of inventory as a toggle/option. Sometimes I'm willing to trade out of inventory, and like the option.

For me, I add a bunch of cards I need to my wish list, but often times I already have them and didn't know, so it's nice to be able to see if I already own cards in my wishlist, by sorting one by the other

Minimum shipping cost is $1.10 I believe. Up to 2 ounces. I ship to canada, so long as it's mutually agreed that tracking isn't necessary.

edit: I don't use bubble mailers or customs forms. Just toploaders taped to some paper, and make sure the envelope isn't too thick. Works fine for me with relatively small numbers of cards.

Not really worth it to ship large numbers of cheap cards, though.

you've significantly surpassed me now, Greg! (gratz!). My trading's definitely slowed. I do wish there was a top 10 list somewhere though. I haven't seen anyone else over 400, so it's probably you. Or, to put it another way, if there was someone with more trades, one of us would have probably noticed.

Hi - I just wanted to see if this bug was still on anyone's radar, and if there's a possible solution in the works? Thanks!

I've also noticed something related:

Lets say I have 10 demonic tutors. I've specified that 5 of them are Revised, one is unlimited, and 4 are unspecified.

Lets say that I put any one of those tutors -- say the unlimited one -- into a trade.

Now lets say that I add any one NEW tutor... OR I edit any of the information in ANY of the tutors (for example, I specify that one of those 4 unspecified ones are in played condition).

Now, the tutor that I have in my trade (The unlimited one) becomes "unlinked" from my trade. In that trade, it now shows that I have an unlimited tutor in the trade, but it shows up Red, as if I don't have it. Now, if I click "Send", and let deckbox take the cards out of my inventory automatically -- it will NOT remove ANY demonic tutor.

What seems to be happening is by adding or editing any detail of any card, that hte deckbox database deletes ALL instances of that card, and replaces all of those instances with NEW instances. Thus the inventory is correctly updated, but any trades using the old instances of those cards are now broken... and the remove-from-inventory feature stops working.