Search options (Page 5 of 54)

Okay, so a few changes to be made and cards to cut:

Rakshasa's Secret is pretty bad.  Against an aggressive deck, they've already dropped their hand before you can really cast this.  Against a control deck, their hand will be full and since they get to choose which two cards to discard, well, they can keep their big threats.  If you're looking for affordable hand-disruption then Despise is the place to be looking.  Obviously Thoughtseize is the gold standard, but if you don't want to drop the cash for them (or don't have them already) then that's $80 worth of four cards...

I get that you're trying to fill the yard, but Bitter Revelation strikes me as a strictly worse Sign in Blood or Read the Bones.  I would say to run one of those and use other cards to fill the yard.

Death Frenzy is just worse than Drown in Sorrow and I would say is even worse than other removal as it will end up taking out all your zombie tokens (not exactly an ideal solution).  I'd honestly cut these for a few Sultai Charms or more general removal.  Sideboard Drown for aggro match-ups, but otherwise, this has no business in the main.

3x Liliana Vess strikes me as too high.  I'd say only run 2x of her at the most.

4x Rakshasa Vizier also strikes me as being too high.  Perhaps cut this down to 3x.

Sultai Soothsayer comes across as a worse version of Satyr Wayfinder, Taigam's Scheming, or Commune with the Gods when it comes to filling the yard.

Shambling Attendants are just bad.  I get that you're looking to use Delve, but there are better cards to be casting with Delve than this.  Treasure Cruise is an easy example as, in the mid-to-late game where you have 7+ cards in the yard, it essentially becomes Ancestral Recall (which is pretty good I hear).

I don't know that I'd run 4x Necropolis Fiend either.  Perhaps as a 2x.  He's a bomb, but in reality is mostly just a 4/5 flyer that will come down for cheap here and there.  His ability isn't something you'll be using all that much.

So, the long story short, delve is a neat mechanic and certainly one with promise, but keep in mind that you only have so many cards in the yard to use with delve.  Once they're used, many of the delve cards are alarmingly overcosted, meaning you need to pick and choose which delve cards to use carefully.

So that being said, I would make the following changes if I were running the deck:

-4x Rakshasa's Secret
-4x Bitter Revelation
-1x Nyx Weaver
-4x Death Frenzy
-2x Liliana Vess
-2x Murderous Cut
-1x Rakshasa Vizier
-4x Sultai Soothsayer
-4x Shambling Attendants
-2x Necropolis Fiend

Total: -28 cards
Needs: 15 cards (as you were 13 over to begin with)

+3x Treasure Cruise
+2x Sultai Charm
+2x Hero's Downfall
+3x Dakra Mystic (it can let you trigger Sidisi one card at a time while also controlling the opponent's draws if they have a Courser)
+2x Sign in Blood
+2x Commune with the Gods or Taigam's Scheming (I'd go commune, but that's me)
+1x Whip of Erebos (lifelink and you can USE the creatures in your yard for more than just delve)

If my math is right, that will put you up at 60 cards and should give you a lot better feel and power for the build.  It might be casual play, but it's always nice to have a deck run smoothly.  Good luck!

First off, is this deck for block constructed, standard?  What format is this meant to be?  Second, what type of setting are you playing in?  Are you looking to rock the kitchen table circuit or are you thinking this is ready for FNM?

From a quick, cursory glance, I can see MAJOR problems with it that would stop it from being good at FNM, but I'll hold off on all of that until you give a sense of where this thing is going.

One quick pointer though, given the amount of fixing in Khans, you really should be running some of the dual or tri-lands (even if you don't have the temples, painlands, or fetches).

For starters, I would consider tossing Seeker of the Way and even Ajani's Pridemate into the mainboard.  Ajani Steadfast also strikes me as being more reliable than Sage of the Inward Eye - reduced cost, more consistent, immediate board impact, etc.

Having said that much, I do think that, by moving out of green, you really are limiting your ability to place +1/+1 counters on Sage of Hours.  Red here really only gives you Sage of the Inward Eye and Jeskai Charm, while green would give you a wealth of options from Ranger's Guile (which protects sage while also triggering heroic), to Ajani, Mentor of Heroes, to Hardened Scales or even Solidarity of Heroes.  All these options will help you build sage in addition to the sunbond combo... remember that redundancy is rather important for any combo deck.

That being said, if you wanted to disrupt said combo, as currently constructed, the opponent could recognize what you're up to and just be sure to take care of Sage before he really gets anywhere (yes, you have some protection for him, but then you're sitting on him in your hand or taking forever to get the combo rolling).  Utter End will simply get rid of him, as would enchantment removal for Sunbond.  Silence the Believers, similar to Utter End, exiles...  etc.  Personally, if I were playing against you, I would just hold up two removal spells and let you put Sunbond on him and then go for the 2-for-1, let you try to counter, and play the other removal in response - netting a 3-for-2, but also really neutering your deck as, without the combo, it doesn't really have much punch from what I can see.

You stated that this is a standard deck, so I'm going to assume that your end goal would be to take it to an FNM and not just get totally destroyed every game.  Please correct me if I'm wrong here.

That being said, I'm seeing quite a few conflicting elements here that I think will make this a bit underwhelming:

1) You have TONS of stuff to fill the yard and seem to have gone overboard with the delve option, but not all of the pieces fit together that seamlessly.  From a quick look through, it seems that the primary win con is to cheat out a Necropolis Fiend for relatively cheap.  Is this correct?  Sidisi really doesn't flood the board as much as you'd think given the current creature count and the number of tools that fill the yard multiple cards at a time.  If this is the case, I think you're REALLY going to struggle in a more competitive environment - specifically, I can easily see where a single Elspeth, Sun's Champion could just stone-wall you.

2) Where's the sideboard?

3) Several of the cards here are highly counter-productive or otherwise just don't really go with a single focused plan.  For instance, Pharika requires you to have creatures in the yard to really impact the board, but delve will, by definition, remove those creatures.  As another example, Villainous Wealth practically demands a strategy utilizing some sort of ramping to then cast it for a large total... yet, you have no ramp here AND will likely be shedding a LOT of your lands to the yard with all the stuff you're using to fill the yard.

4) The mana-base is SLOW and doesn't even have the advantages of scry lands.  Seriously, where are the Theros block pieces?  If you just started that's fine, but they're going to be pretty important to be competitive.  The M15 pain-lands can also be a great help here, even as 1-2x of each (Yavimaya Coast and Llanowar Wastes in case you didn't already know).

So, where do you go from here?  Well, luckily there are plenty of options:

1) Go for a more ramp-centric build that really focuses on Villainous Wealth and a few other bombs - for this keep your eyes on Travis Woo's posts over at Channel Fireball as he's pretty interested in doing just this type of thing (and has even said so himself).

2) Have a bit of fun with Sidisi and toss a few delve pieces in there for a good time.  Note that this strategy requires nowhere even close to the amount of digging you have currently in your deck.  To do this sort of thing I would advocate for Sylvan Caryatid, Courser of Kruphix (if you can get them), and things of that nature.  I actually have been playing with a build based around Sidisi and some funny interactions and it has performed alright (not perfectly, but it wins more than it loses).  You can see that build here: https://deckbox.org/sets/788285  Amusingly enough Omenspeaker and Dakra Mystic have been absolute all-stars for me as they let you fix your draws while letting you screw up an opponent (if they have a Courser in play, you can literally control their draws to some extent) AND offering a nice card-by-card way to trigger Sidisi.

3) Go with some sort of a reanimator build.  For these I would look to the recent SCG results that had some of these elements.  Here the key really is Whip of Erebos and the flexibility it provides you to reanimate your stuff.  Sidisi milled that Abhorrent Overlord off the top of your deck?  What a shame, now you can reanimate it for four, get five harpy tokens, and swing with a 6/6 flying lifelink.  Note that people doing this have been using white so they can utilize Ashen Rider from Theros as an absolute reanimation bomb - something you could still do here as you will frequently mill them to the yard and can also use Sultai Charm to drop the ones you draw.

4) Go with a yard filling strategy not unlike Conley Woods' B/G dredge deck from before rotation.  You pick up a few added pieces with the delve that will make the deck a bit more potent (card draw, Murderous Cut, etc.).  The key here is not to load up too heavily on the delve cards.  I think the big mistake you're making at the moment here is having too many delve cards in the build... think about it, you can cast Dead Drop for B and exile 9 cards from your yard, but what about that second copy in your hand?  Now you have a REALLY overcosted card that you're spending your turns filling the yard just to cast.  Anyway, google Conley Woods B/G dredge and see if that's more up your alley.

I hope some of this mess helps.  I'd be happy to explain anything you're confused with or aren't following further.  Good luck!

I can openly say that if you're going to build without the life-gain, Sigarda is a MUCH better general than Emmara Tandris - she's just, well, bad... if you consider that for 1 more mana you're sitting on Avacyn, Angel of Hope.

Those are the two commanders you're after... The best way I've found to make a token deck effective is to limit the number of token types it is creating, in turn, improving the synergy of the various cards you're working with.  Thankfully you have a TON of options to choose between.  I would suggest trying out Soldiers if you want a more white-centric build, but one that SHOULD be nicer on the budget (and easier to track the cards down) these days.

Here's a link to the G/W token deck I made my GF using Trostani as the general:

https://deckbox.org/sets/694735

I hope that helps.

So if you're looking for a more mid-range strategy, you typically will want more removal and a lower density of threats (but with those threats being, well, more threatening).  So if you'd prefer a Mardu Mid-Range build, I've been tinkering with the following list:

3 Temple of Triumph
3 Temple of Silence
3 Temple of Malice
4 Bloodstained Mire
3 Mountain
3 Swamp
2 Caves of Koilos
2 Battlefield Forge
2 Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth
4 Goblin Rabblemaster
3 Crackling Doom
3 Mardu Charm
3 Thoughtseize
3 Butcher of the Horde
2 Sarkhan, the Dragonspeaker
1 Mardu Ascendency
2 Utter End
2 Hero's Downfall
3 Anger of the Gods
1 Elspeth, Sun's Champion
3 Magma Jet
3 Stormbreath Dragon
2 Chandra, Pyromaster

Sideboard:
1 Deicide
3 Despise
2 Stoke the Flames
2 Chained to the Rocks
2 Drown in Sorrow
2 Banishing Light
3 Nyx-Fleece Ram

So what you'll notice about this build is that it is aimed toward a much slower, longer game.  Whereas the aggro deck is built to literally crap creatures onto the field, this one has a lot of emphasis on disruption, removal, and versatility.  Most players don't run Anger mainboard, but rather than be caught off-guard against aggro and ramp decks, I prefer having the option there.  You can use it to easily take out a fleet of aggro stuff or even to drop your opponent's mystics and caryatids - nothing is more back breaking for a green deck than losing 2-3 rampers on t3.  You have more pointed removal in Magma Jet, Utter End, Hero's Downfall, Crackling Doom, Mardu Charm, and even Thoughtseize.  But you'll note that ALL of these cards play multiple roles in the game plan, i.e., Magma Jet which can burn a player/PW, torch a critter, or just be used to fix your upcoming draws with the scry.

How does one win the game here?  Well, through a battle of attrition AND some major threats.  Goblin Rabblemaster just craps card advantage.  Chandra can give you added cards.  Stormbreath is often a win on its own, and, if not, Sarkhan and Elspeth are happy to clean up too.  So again, the challenge is to make it to the mid-game at which point you will just dominate.

I'm not going to claim that this build is ideal, but it has a lot of options.  The true control deck for the post-rotation format has yet to really be defined (or really even be attempted that much).  The simple fact is that control has relied on Supreme Verdict and Sphinx's Revelation for so long that control players have to remember what they were doing before RTR came along.

Anyway, I hope something from these builds makes sense.  I can provide more clarification on card choices if you like or if you're more interested in the decision process behind why one would go with an aggro deck versus mid-range versus control.

Good luck!

So I think there are a few issues here, but first:

1) Is this for FNM play?  If so, how competitive is it at your FNM?  Are we talking all tier 1 decks or are there plenty of home brews?

2) What's your budget to improve the deck?

Now, for the deck itself:

Most importantly, you need to choose the strategy as it's currently split between something sort-of aggro and a more mid-range deck.  Trying to saddle the line between the two seldom ends well.  You really need to pick one and run with it.

I don't know that either strategy is ideal, as it has yet to be seen whether the tri-colored "clan" decks will be worth anything or not (it would be a shame if they weren't).  As it sits, I'm not sure about Athreos or Iroas for either build and you'd be better served with the appropriate fetches and Mana Confluence - at the moment you're sitting on 15 land that come into play tapped.  You would also do well with more land outright - Aggro typically can get away with 22 lands and a curve that tops at 4, mid-range needs roughly 24 lands but can have things at 5-6 play reliably.  As it sits you only have 22... so that would suggest an aggro deck, but then you would want to drop quite a few pieces.

So the tl;dr version, pick either aggro or mid-range and really focus in on that strategy more.

You're going to have to give us a bit more information if at all possible:

1) What type of setting are you looking to play in?  Is this supposed to be king of the kitchen table or are you wanting to go to competitive events?

2) In the same vein, do you have a format restriction?  It is likely you'll want to keep it standard legal if you're going for competitive events, but for a more casual format, the sky is the limit.

3) Do you have particular strategies in mind?  What drew you to Golgari as opposed to some other color pairing?  Are you all about graveyard manipulation and shenanigans?  Do you have specific cards (aside from what you have listed) or combos that you're looking to utilize?

4) What is your budget for building said deck?  Are you looking for something fun and dirty on the cheap or a real competitor that might cost a fair bit?

I'm sure people get put off when I say this, but it is true: the more information you provide to the community, the more likely it is that the community will be able (and willing) to help.

I agree with you that the evaluation of cards for constructed is a different animal than draft; but for someone whose collection is lacking, who has little-to-no experience in developing strategy or identifying win-cons, and of that like, I still think that drafting is the more enjoyable way to learn.

That being said, even if you're a draft superstar, constructed is a very different place and it can be quite frustrating to see ideas that look absolutely stunning on paper fail to materialize in an actual play environment.

I mean it's open for you to decide Charlemagne, I'd just like for newer players to have fun while still learning some of the fundamentals of how to play better... either way.

First and foremost be sure to communicate with your trading partner.  I've seen enough postings in the BTRs just because people didn't take the time to talk to one another.  Make sure he/she is informed of the hiccup and keep them in the loop every few days, even if your update is "I still haven't heard anything back."

Second, do NOT cancel the trade.  Keep it open until all parties have received their cards, or, in the event something goes terribly wrong, the trade has to be annulled or something.

Third, go talk to the post office.  I'm assuming since you are referencing tracking through PayPal this means the cards were sent via the USPS.  They should be able to provide some additional information regarding WHY the cards were deemed undeliverable.  My guess would be that either the address is incorrect or there was an issue regarding packaging/size and postage (again those may seem unlikely, but clearly something went wrong).

Fourth, based on what you've posted, it would seem they are being returned to you.  If that is the case, once they come back, then just be ready to go resend them.  Double, no, triple or quadruple check the address given by your trade partner (both with them and based on what they entered) and even consider using a different courier if you want to be extra sure.

So the tl;dr version:
1) Go talk to the USPS, they should be able to tell you something.
2) Don't cancel the trade until both parties have confirmed that they have received the cards or until instructed otherwise by a Deckbox moderator.

For anyone looking to comment on this one, please note that it's an EDH deck (although I'd imagine you can tell that much already).