re: lower FB sends first.

I think this shouldn't apply after a certain threshold (50 trades?  80? 100?).  It's silly to retain "seniority" if both sides are proven to be active, honest traders. 


re: cross-format.

As Paul said, communication issue.  If this matters to you, say it at the start of the trade or put it in your profile.  For some cards, it's not even worth worrying about and putting a blanket restriction on this just confuses newbies that read the guideline. 


re: "trading down".

For the record, I hate this term.  It's unclear and everyone has varying definitions for it and therefore varying consequences in terms of a trade.  It's also another communication thing.  If it matters to you, say something at the start of the trade/put it in profile.  Otherwise, don't confuse newbies.

102

(43 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

morph66 wrote:

oh wow mbknight you are such a god damn victim here, you poor sweetheart. All you did was call me crazy to warn the others when what you actually did was insult my intelligence by  calling me retarded.

WTF did i just read. what a slanted view of what actually happened.

You proposed a trade, i didn't like it. I countered, you didn't like it. Instead of putting your big boy pants and moving on, you decided to take it a step further and wail like a baby and and call me names. Now you are here trying to appeal to the masses by making up some really lame "I did it for the people speech." Grow the hell up, you immature brat. Nobody forced you to do anything. There is a cancel button. You hit it and bid a person farwell, get some thicker skin.

Here's a simple question: did you or did you not try to evaluate your cards at your own value based on past value?

His story explains the trade in question (http://deckbox.org/trades/117823?s=33382) better than yours. 

People making up their own value for cards is a personal pet peeve.  Card value constantly change.  You can speculate all you want on card value but if you want to trade for cards on the decline at the lower value, then wait for that card to actually reach that value (unless both parties agree beforehand of course).  The same with trading cards on the rise for higher than current.  You don't get to value a rising card at some higher future value until that card actually reaches that number.  Of course a trade is more than just comparing numbers.  It is, however, insulting when one party starts pulling out random numbers out of nowhere.

103

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

104

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Did the Karn get traded off?

106

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Bump.

Would you trade Goyf for Jace + difference?

Bump.

Bump.

shifty4690 wrote:

For green sun and chainer I would like to get $7, since I do also have to ship them, the extra dollar would cover stamps, loader and envelope.

That's not much of a deal if I can get them from TCG for 8-ish.

I'd give you 6 for GSZ + Chainer's.  Or trade for small things on your list, I don't care.

This came up a couple of times and people don't seem to understand equivalent value so I'll try to explain here.

When trading, the most fair way to compare value is by using the same metric.  The default setting on deckbox is TCGMid.  However, since deckbox doesn't automatically show TCGMid value for some things (promos, foils, sealed products, playmats, etc.), sometimes you have to look elsewhere to find an agreeable metric.  TCG generally has values for foils/promos people can look up so that's usually a non-issue.  However for sealed product/other things, eBay is usually the go-to because it is (usually) the cheapest place to get something. 

Now to where I get into arguments: if we're using eBay for our baseline metric, the fairest comparison to eBay lowest BiN values (i.e. the cheapest value you can get a card) is TCGLow. 

Compare some cards on eBay vs TCGLow:

Goyf

Windswept Heath

eBay/TCGLow value is around how much you can get if you were to sell your card to someone (on here, on eBay, to whoever except for stores) and you can then buy whatever card you want with that money.  Since you will most likely want to get the cheapest deal you can, that will most likely be eBay/TCGLow value (outside of sniping deals on eBay/elsewhere).  Put another way: you can't pay eBay in $140 Goyfs for anything.  You have to sell the Goyf (or whatever card) first and then buy whatever.  So in short, trading at eBay/TCGLow value eliminates that middle step but that is essentially what you're doing. 

To reiterate: if you're wanting something (say a sealed FTV) at eBay value, don't value your cards at TCGMid for comparison because that is not the same metric.

/rant

Bump.

Fetches, shocks.

Aaaand gone.

Have foil new Foundry.  Looking for 3 shocks.

Trading from inventory?  I got 4 extra Ooze.

119

(28 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Helios52 wrote:

Bob dropped to around 50ish then a month after MMA came out he jumps to 75 and he was even reprinted as Judge Promo.

That jump was almost strictly b/c SCG was buying out Bob at GP:Vegas.  Similar to how Horizon Canopy spiked more than double recently.

Bump.

121

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Bump.

Bump.

124

(52 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

Bump.

Bump.