Search options (Page 6 of 33)

While IANAL, my work history includes time in retail management, and I can tell you that prices themselves are not protected. Stores regularly monitor their competitor's prices.  While in retail books, I had to kick my former boss (from another chain) out of my store because she was not only logging prices, but also photographing everything (back when all cameras were film-based). I regularly record retail prices when shopping, and keep them in a spreadsheet to track price patterns (e.g., big meat sale every 10 weeks).

The issue here is that we had been using an interface created by TCGPlayer to get our pricing information, so TCGPlayer controlled the terms that allowed us to use that interface.  They didn't like what was happening, so they "took their ball and went home" (so to speak).

<soapbox>

Sebi and company, rather than letting the site sit with no price information, worked hard to get something in place right away--Amazon pricing. It may not be ideal, but it was also not intended to be a permanent replacement. They've invested far too much thus far (time, money, nights, weekends, and holidays) to walk away (though I'm sure they've been tempted). It's going to take time to get things fixed with a new price source--work that needs to get done in Sebi's spare time (outside his other responsibilities in life).

Again, while I am not a lawyer (and certainly no expert in international commerce), I do believe some of the pricing resources others have mentioned may be valid options, even if those resources utilize prices from TCGPlayer.  TCGPlayer's agreement governs the direct (API) access to their pricing information.  Access to the data provided by those other services is governed by the EULA or Terms of Service each has in place. To exercise an abundance of caution, perhaps prices could be aggregated from multiple sources.

As a final thought, the reason so many people trust TCGPlayer pricing is because they aggregate prices from many sources. As this site continues to grow, I can envision other sellers wanting to sell through Deckbox. That would give us the type of pricing data that could make Deckbox the de facto and trusted source for pricing information.  We just need to ride out this storm.

No matter how shocked we were by the change... No matter how frustrated we may feel about the loss of a reliable pricing source... No matter how much any of us may feel like giving up and moving on... we need to remember that we are the Deckbox community! and we are the ones who have helped this site become a rising star. We need to take a collective breath and give Sebi and company time to do what they do. If you've been with us for a while, you'll realize just how far the site has come. You'll recall how attentive Sebi has been to comments and suggestions. And though sometimes we've had to wait longer for some fixes and features [Thanks for the vacation flag, Sebi!], he's kept the updates and fixes coming. He'll do it again in this situation. I look forward to seeing the pricing system resolved, but, more importantly, I look forward to many great days of tracking, trading, and selling ahead.

</soapbox>

Hmmm... I still have a wishlist, so removing it is not an option. Just because I have a wishlist doesn't mean I want trade opportunities thrust in front of me all the time. I can go to the trading opportunities page when I want to look for opportunities that match my wishlist.

Don't give up so quickly. All significant changes take time.

In the interim, would it be difficult to add additional fields in the trade interface that would let members manually enter/modify prices for each trade item? That way, at least both sides would have record of the proposed price (looked up manually from a third party site) in the trade window.

Many of us have said--many times--that we would PAY to use Deckbox--the Deckbox we've grown to love.

Thanks, again, all. Went 3-2 for the day. Could have used two more blood moon in the sideboard, I guess. Had some fun matches, though.

Thanks, all, for the feedback.  I'm borrowing a couple of Blood Moon for my sideboard and discovered I have a couple of Shatterstorm, so will be looking to tweak things a bit with those in mind.

Is the 6.9% figure firm? Combining that with PayPal fees brings the transaction cost to near 10%--pretty weighty. The transaction fee (sans PayPal fees) is more than twice typical merchant fees for handling credit cards.  Personally, I'd be more likely to sell if the fees were limited to not more than 3.5%.

I realize it's your business, so I don't want you to feel strong-armed away from the model you've decided upon. I'm just lobbying for the house to keep a smaller percentage of the take.

Hurray!!!