I have a (sort of) similar deck here. Impact Tremors seems like an auto include in your deck as well.
202 2016-02-24 13:31:26
Re: Foil and non-foil versions of the same card? (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Just add a second entry in your inventory. Leave one non-foil and mark the other as foil.
203 2016-02-23 16:00:54
Re: elimination filter (5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Seems reasonable. Hey Sebi!
204 2016-02-23 14:59:42
Re: elimination filter (5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Maybe we could get a variant tag for collections which would exclude them from deck searches?
205 2016-02-20 02:24:01
Re: Creature Ablitities (1 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)
Gatherer has a really good advanced search tool. [url=http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?text=+[whenever]+[you]+[cast]+[a]+[spell]+[untap]]Example[/url].
206 2016-02-19 20:45:37
Re: Tracking and Trade Liability (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
It does directly contradict the following message
If this is the case then Sebi needs to clear it up. I would agree that the sender needs prove that it was delivered, not just sent.
207 2016-02-19 20:25:46
Re: Tracking and Trade Liability (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Quoting from your profile:
" Right now I'm only looking to trade if the value is significantly (20%, or 25% if international and less than $100) in my favor. If your proposal doesn't meet this criteria I'll probably pass on it. Also, I prefer larger trades to smaller ones, and I will likely pass on trades worth less than $50 unless they are particularly attractive."
Yeah, if you're gonna shark(whether your trade partner knows the skew or not, it is sharking) a trader for 20 bucks in your favor, even if only one package out of 100 gets lost on its' way to you, you can afford to lose those cards, as you've profited enough from all the packages that arrived.
Additionally, I'm going to have to assume that if the package you sent out got lost, you'd happily keep your trade partner's cards, as tracking would show that the cards were sent.
Some bold assumptions here that have nothing to do with the thread. Please stay on topic.
208 2016-02-19 20:19:29
Re: Tracking and Trade Liability (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
People should use tracking to be able to show that something was delivered. Deckbox used to require "proof of delivery", but at some point this was changed to merely require a package to be tracked. But I think that creates some bad incentives and some serious potential feel-bad scenarios, and the rules should be changed back to how they were. I'm not sure why they were ever changed to begin with.
I don't believe this was ever changed. The Trading Rules still says:
2.2. Sending cards. The sender is responsible for getting the cards to the destination. He will be held accountable for items lost in the mail if a form of tracking was not used; proof of sending is not sufficient. Tracking should show the package delivered to the proper address.
209 2016-02-17 21:15:31
Re: Ulamog's Crusher (2 replies, posted in General Discussion)
"Unplayable if you want to be highly competitive" perhaps would be more correct. In competitive modern there are just better bombs available for Tron: Wurmcoil Engine, Karn Liberated, Ugin, the Spirit Dragon, and Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger. For a budget build Ulamog's Crusher is just fine, but a colorless 7 drop would probably be better since it's possible to drop one on turn 3. Maybe Bane of Bala Ged.
210 2016-02-17 14:00:04
Re: Card Database, Editions pages aren't working (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
<3
211 2016-02-17 13:32:31
Re: Card Database, Editions pages aren't working (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Basically anything on the website
Oh yeah, no decks either atm. Hopefully Sebi can get to it quick.
212 2016-02-17 13:29:16
Topic: Card Database, Editions pages aren't working (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Title.
213 2016-02-15 19:48:36
Re: Missing printings, card numbers, editions for specific cards (853 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Lu Bu, Master-at-Arms has two promo "printings." Both are technically prerelease printings, but with different date stamps. One is stamped with April 29, 1999 and was for the Japanese prerelease of P3k. The other is stamped with July 4, 1999 and was for the Singaporean prerelease. TCGPlayer has pictures of both, though not high quality.
The Ajani Vengeant promo is also odd as there was only 1 printing, but it was given out at both the prerelease and the release events and as such is included in both lists here on deckbox. It's certainly not a big deal, but it would be nice if we could somehow have 1 copy in our inventory that counted as both a prerelease and release "printing."
214 2016-02-12 20:24:56
Re: Missing printings, card numbers, editions for specific cards (853 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Looks like there are two Endbringer Launch promos (#33 and #34). Is there a difference between them, or is this just some bad data?
https://deckbox.org/editions/147-launch =n&o=a
I'm sure there is only 1 release/launch promo. Sebi can you remove the second one, please?
215 2016-02-04 15:39:26
Re: Minimum Order Price (9 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
My suggestion would be to do the same as TCGPlayer and require a $1 minimum, not including shipping. That way it's not much of a hassle for the buyer and the seller shouldn't be losing any money. We certainly still won't like tiny orders like that, but if we're listing cheap cards we have to expect it.
Alternatively, make the criteria of the sellers' shipping options mandatory. I personally have several shipping options at different prices for different amounts of cards. Just make it so that the cart will only display the shipping options that apply to the cards in the cart. For example, I offer free shipping for up to 8 cards in a pwe, or up to 30 cards in a bubble mailer. If someone has 10 cards in their cart the pwe option should not be enabled/available.
216 2016-01-29 17:10:59
Re: U/R Storm, thoughts? advice? (4 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)
Storm loves Manamorphose.
217 2016-01-29 14:25:57
Re: Favorite Type of Deck to Play (4 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)
I hate decks that have no interaction. Probably the various flavors of control for me.
218 2016-01-27 14:19:03
Re: Price issues (389 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
(people hate the bucket island).
ftfy
219 2016-01-25 16:46:38
Re: Combo deck (11 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)
How does "Lavaclaw Reaches" fit into the combo?
In the same way that Wandering Fumarole does. X can be 0.
220 2016-01-18 15:12:43
Re: Recent Modern Bans (7 replies, posted in General Discussion)
I haven't played competitively for a while and when I do it's usually with a fringe deck like 8-rack. My current pet deck is suicide zoo. 4 Thoughtseize and 2 Vines of Vastwood mb made Twin not a bad matchup and a 3rd Vines and 3 Dismember sb were also good answers if needed. Suicide Zoo is, for the most part, a non-interactive deck though and boarding in specific answers tends to just make the deck worse and slower.
221 2016-01-18 14:51:24
Re: Recent Modern Bans (7 replies, posted in General Discussion)
I'm definitely happy to see Bloom gone. As for Twin, it doesn't affect me too much, but it will be nice to not have to consider it when building a sideboard.
222 2016-01-17 14:38:09
Re: A feature request: sorting cards in the trade window (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Rarity would be my preferred sort method.
223 2016-01-13 16:25:59
Re: database: Oath of the Gatewatch (25 replies, posted in Announcements)
Thanks, Sebi. I personally use Ctrl-I all the time.
224 2016-01-08 21:40:51
Re: The commander slot should affect the value of a deck (5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Or were you just talking about that test "deck?" I assumed you were talking about my actual sliver edh deck.
225 2016-01-08 21:38:05
Re: The commander slot should affect the value of a deck (5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I think sliver hivelord would be a better fit for your deck.
Why? When I can just tutor for it?