Yep, that is indeed our current stance on adding new games.
We will come back to you if anything changes though!
2,326 2012-03-23 20:03:45
Re: The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
2,327 2012-03-22 19:34:07
Re: Inventory Privacy [Feature Request] (49 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
ZATZAi wrote:
The trade list and wish list are different from the inventory though. A lot of us list all the cards in our inventory on this site because it helps us manage cards for decks, and trade, see what we need and where. The trade and wish list being public is one thing, but I think everyone here is not talking about that but about the Inventory, which includes the trade list sure, but is a lot more than just the trade list.
That makes sense. Ok, i've taken note.
2,328 2012-03-22 18:16:31
Re: Inventory Privacy [Feature Request] (49 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Yep, it's an interesting ideea, we shall consider it.
The problem is that making a tradelist or wishlist not public kind of goes against the purpose of the trading platform 
. We would need to exclude a person with a private tradelist from the listings on the card page, from possible trading opportunities, and also we cannot show the 'trading intersection' when other users visit your profile.
2,329 2012-03-22 08:49:04
Re: Logins from multiple devices (7 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hmm, this is actually not done on purpose. There have been reports of "remember me" problems a while back too.
We will check it out.
2,330 2012-03-21 08:48:32
Re: Clicked the wrong button (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Done and done!
2,331 2012-03-20 08:31:17
Re: Clicked the wrong button (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello,
Nope, right now you cannot edit feedback after you left it. If you made a mistake, please link the feedback here and we will change it for you.
2,332 2012-03-16 17:44:59
Re: Using deckbox.org pictures (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello zuko,
We provide the tooltip service free of charge to everybody, because the card names become links to our website, thus enlarging the community.
If you want to use the images without linking to us, I would suggest building a script that saves them on your server, so you can serve them from there instead of hotlinking from us.
You can email us for any other details on that at admin@deckbox.org
2,333 2012-03-16 17:38:29
Re: Where is the "People with the most cards to offer me table" (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hey Shoe,
The widget was slowing down the profile page, and we've received some negative feedback on its usability and usefulness in its current shape. We have removed it temporarily, but we're adding it back in an extended shape soon (a special trade reports page probably).
2,334 2012-03-16 17:35:04
Re: Possible to include Edition / Detail Icons in Trading Opportunities? (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
This is already in the making. Should be done in next week's update!
2,335 2012-03-15 19:27:24
Re: WHI - separate loyalty from cost column (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello. When would you sort by loyalty instead of cost? Is there a specific situation that comes around often?
2,337 2012-03-13 17:38:41
Re: Specify edition in deck [feature req] (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello Lithl, thanks for the feedback. Card details in decks we haven't gotten to implement yet, but we are working on improvements to details in inventory/ tradelist / wishlist right now, which should address some of your issues.
2,338 2012-03-13 17:35:29
Re: Magic Set Missing (Duels of the Planeswalkers Decks) (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hi. This was indeed requested a few times, we really want to add it. We did not yet because it's not on gatherer, so we need to write an importer for magiccards.info.
It will come though, soon. Along with Vanguard
2,339 2012-03-13 17:32:08
Re: Sort/Filter by Foiled/Promo (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello. We definitely want to do this! It had a low priority, but we're getting to it
2,340 2012-03-13 17:30:53
Re: Upcoming features (150 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hey quasur,
Thanks for the feedback. The edition / card details handling we are working on right now, so by next week there should be a much improved inventory ui 
.
I'm not sure about the Promo handling yet, but the additional additional properties like signed are definitely coming.
2,341 2012-03-12 18:49:02
Re: Legend of the Five Rings? (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
While adding new games would be pretty cool, and has been requested for a couple of other TCGs also, I'm afraid it will not happen too soon as it adds a lot of work and maintenance overhead.
Towards the end of the year, after we clear out some more of the older requested features from our todo list, we might start thinking about it though
2,342 2012-03-12 18:47:27
Re: Combos on card pages [feature request] (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Yep, sounds like a good idea!
2,343 2012-03-11 09:38:23
Re: [Feature discussion] Trade score. Feedback and disputes. (61 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
marumari wrote:
Is there any way to provide negative feedback without canceling the trade?
Once it's cancelled, it drops off the list of trades that people would see, so I worry that negative feedback wouldn't be too helpful. Otherwise, I can click I "received" the cards (I didn't), but I still can't leave feedback until they do the same thing.
Hmm, this is a very good point.
I think the issue is that we have to distinguish between 2 situations.
A "canceled trade" which was closed because it was abandoned or someone changed their mind. These kinds of trades should not count as feedback.
On the other hand, a trade that has been canceled after being accepted by both parties, should count. If it's accepted, there has to be a serious reason for cancelation, and feedback is important then.
We'll think about it a little, but I would change the feedback system in this way, making the "accept" button more important.
2,344 2012-03-11 09:24:06
Re: Accidental neutral rating (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Done!
2,345 2012-03-10 09:07:31
Re: Wishlist Query (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I see what you mean. We'll think of a solution
2,346 2012-03-08 22:52:27
Re: Drag/Drop Deck Move broken in IE9 [bug] (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Thank your for a very detailed explanation of the IE9 bugs (and also its advantages ).
The double enter flow was like that by design, we wanted to give the user an opportunity to either tab to the count after selecting the card or press enter again to add it. It is also consistent with the Advanced (rainbow icon) add widget, where you first press enter to select the card and then you either press enter again to set the defaults or edit them first and press enter when finished.
So IE single-enter flow is a bug in this case, even though I can see why people like it in some situations .
The tab flow is indeed quirky. Pressing tab once, as you say should move the focus AND select the current dropdown option. Thus this is sort of a bug in chrome, as you have to press it once for selecting the entry, and again for moving focus.
IE9 has a couple more bugs on record (the aforementioned advanced dialog is not properly working, it was reported), and it's high time we did an IE debugging session (oh, how I love those 
).
2,347 2012-03-08 18:42:36
Re: possible new feature (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
This is a pretty cool idea. Added to the list!
2,348 2012-03-08 12:48:57
Re: [Feature discussion] Trade score. Feedback and disputes. (61 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Good point on the fast / slow trading.
There is the possibility to add an Overall feedback rating, and also detailed ones like "Condition of cards" "Speed of delivery" "Packaging". Would that help?
2,349 2012-03-08 11:25:38
Re: Guidelines on dealing with bad traders? (26 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Hey guys,
Sorry to barge in your discussion, even if I'm not a member of your community 
Just wanted to point out we've made a post describing our intentions of making trade feedback more prominent in the Site discussion forum here: http://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1574
Let us know what you think.
2,350 2012-03-08 11:20:07
Topic: [Feature discussion] Trade score. Feedback and disputes. (61 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello everybody,
As users trade more and more on deckbox, we feel some features and information on best practices should be addressed.
I'm making this post as sort of a 'next features' announcements, to let you know that we are consolidating some information on how to handle trading and trading disputes. (The current trade guidelines, as you know, are present here: http://deckbox.org/help/trade). Until we add more information do not hesitate to email us at support@deckbox.org if you feel a trade has been not fair. We will moderate a discussion and assign correct feedbacks.
Trade feedback will come more to the front as well. We are considering adding a user's feedback directly to his profile, and also displaying a "percent positive" rating much like ebay has. These scores will be displayed next to a user's name in all listings and of course on profiles. We want to encourage fair trading, so we're making feedback count!
As always, let us know what you think of these future changes, or what else you would like to see implemented.
Thanks!
[Edit] I've made a new post with more ideas that we are currently considering here: http://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=26094#p26094