Mirko Vosk, Mind Drinker :-) Mill Baby, mill :-)

May I budge in and say it's kinda shit? Stats foarte proaste sau costul ridicat, iar abilitatea ma cam lasa rece( e extrem de slow)...
Nu'mi dau seama ce mizerie au Wizards cu Dimirul...

Silviu wrote:May I budge in and say it's kinda shit? Stats foarte proaste sau costul ridicat, iar abilitatea ma cam lasa rece( e extrem de slow)...
Nu'mi dau seama ce mizerie au Wizards cu Dimirul...

Mirko Vosk este o mare mizerie. Chiar si pt limited e below-average.
underwhelming overall..

Pana acum nu prea ma impresioneaza campionii, in afara de Lavinia of the Tenth care e foarte tare (ea + Conjurer's Closet = GG) si Teysa, Envoy of Ghosts care e draguta. As mai zice si despre Exava, Rakdos Blood Witch si Ruric Thar, the Unbowed ca sunt ok-ish. Eu doar sper ca cele de Boros si Selesnya sa nu fie la fel de crap.

Silviu wrote:Nu'mi dau seama ce mizerie au Wizards cu Dimirul...

Yup :( why? :(

..daca Bred for the Hunt era in Gatecrash, Simic era probabil la fel de bun ca si orzhov. damn you wizards !

m0nstersnatch wrote:..daca Bred for the Hunt era in Gatecrash, Simic era probabil la fel de bun ca si orzhov. damn you wizards !

Ce a fost interesant in comunitatea mea, e ca toata lumea drafta boros sau orzhov. Daca vroiai simic, aveai toate bunataturile din lume (faceau ture de masa carti ca si 3/1 fly trample sau altele de genul) si tot nu prea a reusit sa castige turnee cei care se indurau si alegeau simic :)
Cred ca si daca ar fi fost cartea asta, tot nu ar fi echilibrat lucrurile
Pe de alta parte, mi se pare mie sau si setul asta e doar pentru limited, fara carti interesante pentru constructed?

toranaga wrote:

m0nstersnatch wrote:..daca Bred for the Hunt era in Gatecrash, Simic era probabil la fel de bun ca si orzhov. damn you wizards !

Ce a fost interesant in comunitatea mea, e ca toata lumea drafta boros sau orzhov. Daca vroiai simic, aveai toate bunataturile din lume (faceau ture de masa carti ca si 3/1 fly trample sau altele de genul) si tot nu prea a reusit sa castige turnee cei care se indurau si alegeau simic :)
Cred ca si daca ar fi fost cartea asta, tot nu ar fi echilibrat lucrurile
Pe de alta parte, mi se pare mie sau si setul asta e doar pentru limited, fara carti interesante pentru constructed?

Exava.Just your finisher.Sau varowtr de la Golgari.Sunt la limita playabilty-ului

toranaga wrote:

m0nstersnatch wrote:..daca Bred for the Hunt era in Gatecrash, Simic era probabil la fel de bun ca si orzhov. damn you wizards !

Ce a fost interesant in comunitatea mea, e ca toata lumea drafta boros sau orzhov. Daca vroiai simic, aveai toate bunataturile din lume (faceau ture de masa carti ca si 3/1 fly trample sau altele de genul) si tot nu prea a reusit sa castige turnee cei care se indurau si alegeau simic :)
Cred ca si daca ar fi fost cartea asta, tot nu ar fi echilibrat lucrurile
Pe de alta parte, mi se pare mie sau si setul asta e doar pentru limited, fara carti interesante pentru constructed?

hmm....cam in toate comunitatile unde erau spikes s-a draftat orzhov sau boros majoritar. din primele saptamani era clar cum castigi in gtc - orzhov sau boros.

Si de Gtc s-a spus ca e mai mult de limited si a fost plin de carti bune pentru constructed. also, avem doar 3/11 mitice spoilute.
Personal mi se par multe carti bune pentru constructed cat timp formatul se mentine la nivelul de acum (sa poti ajunge la 15-16 mana lejer cu unele deck-uri fara sa pierzi, de exemplu)

toranaga wrote:

m0nstersnatch wrote:..daca Bred for the Hunt era in Gatecrash, Simic era probabil la fel de bun ca si orzhov. damn you wizards !

Ce a fost interesant in comunitatea mea, e ca toata lumea drafta boros sau orzhov. Daca vroiai simic, aveai toate bunataturile din lume (faceau ture de masa carti ca si 3/1 fly trample sau altele de genul) si tot nu prea a reusit sa castige turnee cei care se indurau si alegeau simic :)
Cred ca si daca ar fi fost cartea asta, tot nu ar fi echilibrat lucrurile
Pe de alta parte, mi se pare mie sau si setul asta e doar pentru limited, fara carti interesante pentru constructed?

Cred ca e un fenomen tipic francez. Si la mine s-a intamplat la fel, diferenta fiind ca puteai castiga USOR draftand Simic. Eu am prins 3 mitice data trecuta, si o gramada de carti faine. Daca la inceput as fi luat Negru ca si a 3-a culoare, nu rosu, aveam mai mult removal si castigam toate rundele (asa, am pierdut una).

Jeeesus that selesnya mythic!!!

fistyke wrote:


Jeeesus that selesnya mythic!!!

Jesus that azorius mythic

TehAuthor wrote:

fistyke wrote:


Jeeesus that selesnya mythic!!!

Jesus that azorius mythic

Ok so what would you name? In afara de trolling la Sphinx's Rev, ofc...

Silviu wrote:

TehAuthor wrote:

fistyke wrote:


Jeeesus that selesnya mythic!!!

Jesus that azorius mythic

Ok so what would you name? In afara de trolling la Sphinx's Rev, ofc...

Pai supreme verdict for example, removal

vs aggro e cam iffy but it's good vs control :)

I think i will stay with naming Revelation. Revelation once, revelation twice, revelation thrice, SOLD!

TehAuthor wrote:

Silviu wrote:

TehAuthor wrote:
Jesus that azorius mythic

Ok so what would you name? In afara de trolling la Sphinx's Rev, ofc...

Pai supreme verdict for example, removal

vs aggro e cam iffy but it's good vs control :)

benczi wrote:I think i will stay with naming Revelation. Revelation once, revelation twice, revelation thrice, SOLD!

TehAuthor wrote:

Silviu wrote: Ok so what would you name? In afara de trolling la Sphinx's Rev, ofc...

Pai supreme verdict for example, removal

vs aggro e cam iffy but it's good vs control :)

1 mana farseek anyone? 3 mana urban evolution? depends on the match-ul

Wanna rape reanimator, name rites

http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=141258&d=1365739313 .Ati zis ca setul e numai pt limited?Ei bine Resurgence asta cred ca isi face o aparitie in multe deckuri.

Bogdish wrote:http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=141258&d=1365739313 .Ati zis ca setul e numai pt limited?Ei bine Resurgence asta cred ca isi face o aparitie in multe deckuri.

e ok-ish, ..., pt. o mitica. dar nu cred ca o sa coste mai mult de $30-$40.

Far/Away

~Flesh // Blood
Sorcery 3BG // Sorcery RG
Exile target creature card from a graveyard. Put X +1/+1 counters on target creature, where X is the power of the exiled card.
//
Target creature you control deals damage equal to its power to target creature or player.


Far Away chiar nice... cheap & flexible. More Esper control tricks.

Council of the Absolute, because the mirror match is made more fun by WINNING!

benczi wrote:

Bogdish wrote:http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=141258&d=1365739313 .Ati zis ca setul e numai pt limited?Ei bine Resurgence asta cred ca isi face o aparitie in multe deckuri.

e ok-ish, ..., pt. o mitica. dar nu cred ca o sa coste mai mult de $30-$40.

Pe la pretul asta se invarte o mitica ok-ish in ziua de azi? Jizas...

Trickster wrote:

benczi wrote:

Bogdish wrote:http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=141258&d=1365739313 .Ati zis ca setul e numai pt limited?Ei bine Resurgence asta cred ca isi face o aparitie in multe deckuri.

e ok-ish, ..., pt. o mitica. dar nu cred ca o sa coste mai mult de $30-$40.

Pe la pretul asta se invarte o mitica ok-ish in ziua de azi? Jizas...

Not really. Uita-te la Obzedat, Ghost Council, probabil cel mai jucabil dintre liderii de ghilda, si e pe la $15.

Restul Cluestone-urilor merg pe acelasi principiu: Cost de 3, generare de mana pe ambele culori, tap + cost pe culori + sacrifice + draw a card.

Cartea in taiwaneza sau ce-o fi zice asa:
Sorcery // Sorcery
Put a 3/3 green Centaur creature token onto the battlefield.
//
You gain 2 life for each creature you control.


~Plasm Capture BBGG Rare
Instant
Counter target spell. At the beginning of your next precombat main phase, add X mana in any combination of colors to your mana pool, where X is that spell’s converted mana cost.

DA! A primit Boros ceva impotriva la control!

Also:

And more spoilers...

At first I thought, wow, nice anti-revelation card, then I saw the draw step condition. Bleh :(

fistyke wrote:

At first I thought, wow, nice anti-revelation card, then I saw the draw step condition. Bleh :(

..un fel de Plagiarize on a stick, dar nu vad rostul cartii decat impotriva la Revelation, altfel chiar bleh :P