Mike_Machine wrote:Worst of all, in the recent thread where he started fighting with Kei_Asaki (James), I must say that Kei_Asaki is probably one of the nicest, friendliest traders on deckbox. I have traded with him multiple times, and even one time where I asked him if he would be willing to make a consideration after we had a committed trade and he was accommodating and friendly.
Careful now, I plan to slow down/take a break when it hits December. I don't want TOO many new offers during that month (postal rush during Christmas, resulting in horrid delays and a much higher chance than normal of mail going missing... does not make me happy. ).
I am honestly torn on the ban decision concerning the main problem user mentioned in this thread. When I first encountered him, he was incredibly abrasive and, well... terribly unpleasant. However, after his suspension, I ended up engaging him in a trade and chatting with him a bit. I have a feeling that he's been a bit misunderstood. He is aggressive, and a bit short tempered, but overall I don't think he was a bad guy. That's just been my experience, though. As Sebi had said, there were many occasions that there were issues being raised with him. It is unfortunate, as he seemed like a decent guy once I got to know him a bit, but I guess he didn't take suggestions and advice to heart and just kept on as he was.
Overall, I do believe that it's a good move to increase the standards of behavior on this site. Better trades, better communications, and repeat business always come from pleasant interactions.