Now shipping worldwide!
Everything on my tradelist is available for sale.
http://deckbox.org/sets/53346?s=q&o=d
Thanks for looking!
26 2014-05-29 12:55:37
Topic: ► Selling all cards on Tradelist ◄ (4 replies, posted in Buying & Selling Cards)
27 2014-05-28 15:03:37
Re: Import does weird splitting on new cards (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I have noticed this as well. In addition to marking the newly entered card as available for trade, it also takes 1 away from the rest if all parameters match.
Can the newly entered line read "1 Inventory / 0 Tradelist" and keep the already entered ones at the same count as it was before "3 Inventory / 3 Tradelist"?
28 2014-05-21 02:16:44
Re: Selling 4x wasteland (1 replies, posted in Buying & Selling Cards)
Selling cards on deckbox now should use the Deckbox Market - more information on how to become a seller is available on the Selling Cards help page.
See also this question on the F.A.Q.
29 2014-05-21 02:15:02
Re: Selling All my paper - Moving to online only (2 replies, posted in Buying & Selling Cards)
Selling cards on deckbox now should use the Deckbox Market - more information on how to become a seller is available on the Selling Cards help page.
See also this question on the F.A.Q.
30 2014-05-20 18:53:38
Re: Price Information About Shipping Costs (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I just want to clarify that for Canada Post, the $9 Registered Mail is only for Domestic mail. For tracking to the states, Xpresspost will be required, which is very expensive. There is a newer option of using a Tracked Packet (only delivery confirmation is provided) for an additional $17.
If anyone knows of a cheaper method, please share 
31 2014-05-13 21:27:27
Re: {H} 4x FS 'Goyf {W} Paypal - $625 (1 replies, posted in Buying & Selling Cards)
Selling cards on deckbox now should use the Deckbox Market - more information on how to become a seller is available on the Selling Cards help page.
See also this question on the F.A.Q.
32 2014-05-13 21:26:24
Re: Judge Foil Force of Wills For Sale (5 replies, posted in Buying & Selling Cards)
TeamSabin wrote:
I've already posted these in High-End Magic on FB. Didn't realize that this was an inappopriate place for this message; terribly sorry.
There were new rules that came with update 3.2 (links provided below) but I see that you ARE a Deckbox Market seller and have listed the cards for sale on your tradelist. So, you ARE indeed allowed to post this message here since you are selling within Deckbox's market. Sorry for the confusion.
33 2014-05-12 14:00:09
Re: My side of a trade went missing.... (5 replies, posted in General Discussion)
Kammikaze wrote:
Since the other person hasn't sent their cards, would an option be just to cancel the trade?
Yes, I apologize, you are correct. Another option would be to just cancel the trade.
34 2014-05-12 12:57:14
Re: My side of a trade went missing.... (5 replies, posted in General Discussion)
Since tracking was not used, it is the responsibility of the sender to make sure the cards are delivered (or returned). Now, you guys will need to agree on another form of compensation - either you send again or PayPal your trade partner the original cost of the trade.
Please refer to the Deckbox Trade Rules for more information: http://deckbox.org/help/trade_rules
35 2014-05-12 00:26:44
Re: Buying: Flooded Strand, Force, Clique, Flusterstorm (7 replies, posted in Buying & Selling Cards)
Selling cards on deckbox now should use the Deckbox Market - more information on how to become a seller is available on the Selling Cards help page.
See also this question on the F.A.Q.
36 2014-05-08 16:58:44
Re: deckbox minimum prices (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
frankenskid wrote:
I would like to see the option of using either price as well.
Same here. While I find the minimum prices useful information to have at times, I'm not sure it's in the ideal spot. It's not something I need to constantly refer to - my inventory would look much cleaner with only one price column.
37 2014-05-08 04:40:25
Re: selling duals, fetches, snapcasters (3 replies, posted in Buying & Selling Cards)
gnp17 wrote:
Hi TBIttenbender,
I just wanted to give you a heads up that there have been new rules implemented that require posts that are looking for sales or purchases to refer to using the deckbox system.
Yes, please refer to Selling Cards help page for any further details.
See also this question on the F.A.Q.
38 2014-05-07 18:33:21
Re: v3.1: Promo Editions in db, Inventory Privacy, The Meadery Interview (47 replies, posted in Announcements)
sebi wrote:
Fixed.
Thank you very much for the quick fix!
39 2014-05-07 17:25:56
Re: v3.1: Promo Editions in db, Inventory Privacy, The Meadery Interview (47 replies, posted in Announcements)
If an inventory is set to private, users can still select cards from your inventory to add to trades. Can this be fixed, please?
40 2014-04-20 17:00:52
Re: Price issues (389 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
sebi wrote:
Rench222 wrote:Hua Tuo, Honored Physician - Commander Edition is listed as $50 when it's only about 50 cents
This is actually correct for the Portal Three kingdoms version.
$50 is correct for the PTK version but it shows $50 for the Commander edition, which is incorrect.
41 2014-04-20 16:17:52
Re: v3.1: Promo Editions in db, Inventory Privacy, The Meadery Interview (47 replies, posted in Announcements)
From the trade window, people can still select cards that are NOT listed in tradelists (only in inventory). So, I'm still getting trade offers for cards that I do not wish to trade. Perhaps for the users who set their inventories to private, those cards should not be selectable for trade.
42 2014-04-19 22:53:34
Re: v3.1: Promo Editions in db, Inventory Privacy, The Meadery Interview (47 replies, posted in Announcements)
Inventory privacy! Very nice! Thank you so much, Deckbox Team 
43 2013-11-29 15:12:46
Re: That little chat bubble beside the Trade link is driving me crazy! (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
44 2013-11-28 21:28:55
Re: That little chat bubble beside the Trade link is driving me crazy! (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
This request would be useful for users who have 20+ pages of completed/cancelled trades to check. As time goes on, I'm sure more and more users will be requesting this as their number of pages increase.
+1
45 2013-11-25 15:46:08
Re: zeked2004 and Andy Yuen trade (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
As long as both parties agree, you may go ahead and cancel the trade. Please leave only positive or neutral feedback.
46 2013-10-30 16:02:14
Re: Can I change feedback for Philip_deVries (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I've moved this topic to Site Feedback as it's not a BTR.
Feel free to send an email to support@deckbox.org and request a feedback change. Please include a link to the trade and what you would like to change your feedback to. Thanks!
47 2013-10-23 03:51:55
Re: 70 Unhinged Lands for sale (40 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Closed
I'd like to remind members to be respectful of each other. The same advice can be offered without such condescension. New users may be deterred when reading threads like this. A smaller community equals less people to trade with.
48 2013-10-20 19:54:51
Re: Release 2.1: Trading Opportunities, important cards in wishlists, etc (42 replies, posted in Announcements)
Great update! Thank you so much!
49 2013-10-19 03:36:41
Re: where is my thread [suspended for ooze trading] (5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Judging by your recent trades, I believe you got suspended for trading Scavenging Ooze promo codes. Please refer to this post: http://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13789
If you have any questions or concerns, please send an email to: support@deckbox.org
50 2013-10-16 21:21:54
Re: Canceling a trade after it is accepted (8 replies, posted in General Discussion)
The intention of the Deckbox rules is to ensure that both parties follow through with the trade once cards have been sent. This is to ensure that each party is responsible for their cards reaching their destination. The reason why the rules are open to interpretation by the Deckbox Team is because it can be misinterpreted by traders. Below, I've provided a quote from Sebi from a past BTR: http://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13399
It seems there are issues with this 'no cancelling after accepting' rule... people are taking that way too ad literam and seriously, we will at least have to rephrase it. I will address this in a future post in announcements.
Hope this helps.