Search options (Page 23 of 31)

vad  ca nimeni nu a intrebat.. "to sideboard or not to sideboard... that is the question" ?

nu prea mult free for all, ca o sa vezi cum o sa fie toti contra unu care are un general un pic mai "infricosator"

sa fie multi mai organizat (emperor, 2hg )

multumesc

pai cartea in sine, nu te ajuta cu nimic... ma gandesc aici de ex la sealed... adversarul nu are nimic, tu nu ai nimic doar landuri si cartea asta...

pai tocmai de asta intreb ca eu as baga vre-o 10 proxy cards, daca este acceptat, mai ales daca Sergiu nu vine, ca el are majoritatea cartilor pe care le-as cere

despre traducere: de tocmai de asta ar fi bine ca sa ne intelegem ce se traduce si ce nu. Ca nici asa nu merge ca in RO sa fie doar cuvinte de lagatura: si, sau, cu, eu, dupa, etc.... ca atunci pt ce traducem

referitor la statistica, poate Laura ne da niste numere, sa vedem cum stam....dar speram ca incet incet lumea va afla si ne va urmari

ps. si eu urmaresc si pe FB... nu comentez nimic, din cand in cand dau un "like"

fiind la inceputul anului, eu zic sa fie constructed multiplayer (2hg, emperor sau ffa..sau ceva)

am tradus ieri cam 50-60% din articol presupun ca azi o sa termin traducerea (a trebuit sa scot placa mea de grafica din comp...sper ca ala vechi sa mai functioneaza)

@Rares + Silviu: Ar fi bine ca toti care doresc sa ne ajuta intr-un mod regulat cu traducerile sa aiba cont pe MTGS ca sa aiba acces la articolul original. Daca ai cont nu trebuie sa trimitem articolul prin mail + o sa fii informat daca ceva se schimba.
Iar de folosit o sa-l folositi de fiecare data cand traduceti un articol , cel putin.

@Sergiu: din cate stiu eu...da, sa apare luni la ora 00

Poezia era destul de greu de imtepretat in romana... poate daca cineva ar fi luat timpul sa traduca doar poezia, iar altcineva restul, era mai usor.

Intradevar suntem dezobisnuiti cu traducerea cuvintelor cheie, care ne ingreuneaza intelegerea articolului... In viitor sper ca cei care o sa formeze echipa de traducere o sa aiba timp sa se consulte si sa cada de acord ce sa fie tradus, iar ce nu va fi tradus, in ce forma va fi folosit (de ex "cast" a fost tradus si castat si castuit... eu folosind cunostintele mele laice, am schimbat toate derivand cuvantul "castuit"... nu zic ca e mai bine decat "castat", pur si simplu am ales una din cele doua)

Daca Silviu doreste (si sper ca va dori) sa ne alaure in lupta cu traducerile, il invit sa-mi trimite prin mail userul de MTGS

ps....nu am auzit cine s-a oferit pt traducerea noului articol

cyclotis04 's first idea is interesting, but will only benefit the people who want to trade every card they don't use.

If you have all your cards in the database (lots of commons you don't really use), and you want to keep a set (4 pieces) of each, for collecting and for "fun" decks, lets say pauper, edh, cube draft, etc. then you will end up with a tone of cards that you have, don't use, but don't want to trade. I think many of us are in this situation. In this case this inventory-deck-tradelist synchronization won't help us not one bit. But as it is optional, I can see how this helps others.

The second method is futile. I mean when building a deck, you do have the number of cards in your inventory and in your current deck available side by side. You can do the math . In your example you wanted to know how many cards are left for.. lets say your family member. The usefulness of this is way to low comparing to how annoying can this be, especially with a warning. Most of us have lots of decks, some for fun, some under development, some just copies of decks found interesting here and there, and most of us don't share cards with a second person (or if we do they have their own account ).
I give you a real example: I have a Tectonic Edge... I use it in all my deck (cause its a fine card), I know I have only one card, and would really be annoyed if somewhere I get the info that there are -37 cards of it available, or the warning all the time. As I said, most of us have a set of 4 cards and use it in many many decks over and over, so summing up cards in decks is useless.

To be able to add cards (not just the name, but the number the deck uses) from one deck to another can be useful. I know that at this point we can copy the whole deck, or add cards easily to existing decks, but hey... some of us are more lazy than others....so the feature is welcomed.