76

(2 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I believe there is an issue with special characters in card names which breaks things like Séance and _____ in certain places but I believe Sebi knows of a workaround.  I don't remember it but MiSfiTtaz_MTGOs suggestion is certainly a good way to go as well.

I sent you an offer for 3 of each.

I guess I won't be putting together a trade.  I am down to 2 Sorin's and I thought I had a 3rd I could trade.  My apologies sad

I have a sorin I can part with.  I am interested in your geist and vorinclex.  I'll put together an offer when I get to a computer.  typing on the phone is hard enough...

I am glad you're going to give this build am try.  Between myself and two friends it's been play tested about 75 times against various decks online and IRL and is certainly a decent strategy.  It's not tier 1 but it can still do ok. 

The dual lands aren't all that necessary, the birds can get you pretty far.  I'd recommend just running forests and islands combined with a 2x evolving wild and 2x swamp setup and add in the duals for islands if/when you get them.  It should play fairly well without the special lands.

I wish you lots of luck!

I knew what you meant but thank you for clarifying.  smile

Glad to hear we aren't too far from each other on how the deck operates.  I hear you on mulch, I was very hesitant to run it initially but after playing with it for several games I couldn't imagine this deck without it.  It makes sure you hit all your land drops and fills the graveyard with stuff. 

Because of mulch in this deck it makes it important to keep the rest of the cards limited to creatures and spells with flashback so that very little goes to waste.  It also makes the deck a little odd to play.  You have to keep in mind that just because you are mulching away good cards doesn't mean you are wasting them, they are still of use just not in the same way they would be when you cast them.

That's probably an obvious statement but it was one of the hardest things for me to get used to when I first started playing this build.

Those are good suggestions, Hellnikko.  From you list I have only tried to work in Bonehoard and I ultimately ended up taking it out.  It worked very well when I had the mana to both cast and equip in a single turn but more often than not the 6 mana just got to be too expensive.  Perhaps Wreath of Geists would be a better alternative since it's super cheap and accomplishes the "surprise" factor I was going for.  Also, it ended up getting pitched to Mulch and Forbidden Alchemy most of the time which made it useless; not that the wreath solves that issue but it hurts less pitching a 1 CMC enchantment IMO.

Parallel Lives I would probably pass on.  Kessig Cagebreakers is a beast when it gets to swing and is usually enough to win the game or at least put you in a position to win the following turn.  He's the jewel of the deck for sure and the reason I recommend running 4 of them.

Grim Flowering I haven't tried but I've given thought to it.  My gut reaction is that the deck doesn't need it, it draws fairly well as is and ideally you want to be winning by turn 6, not drawing a bunch of cards and passing the turn because you're out of mana.  I did consider making room for 3 or 4 Thought Scours to accomplish a similar effect though.

Do my experiences and assumptions match what you've seen with your version of the deck, Hellnikko?  it's always nice to get a second opinion smile

83

(9 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

I have a ton of the CoK block (yes it's funny) stuff you have on your wishlist.  You don't have anything on your tradelist I am actively seeking but the wasteland and Grindstone are good trade stock so I think we can make a deal. 

I don't have a ton of time at the moment to look through your whole wishlist for kamigawa commons/uncommons you're chasing but odds are I have them.

Make me an offer!

Assuming a 4-round Swiss configuration at the tournament  you'll be attending, the tuned-up Dethfed deck I have in mind will probably get you anywhere from an 0-4 to 2-2 record (0 to 2 match wins) depending on your match-ups.  You'll probably lose hard to fast aggro decks (pre-sideboard) and heavy control decks but compete at a decent level against mid-range strategies except for, maybe, grixis control (ewww). 

Like I said, though, it will take the least amount of effort (and money) to bring the Deathfed pre-con up to speed.

Here's a link to the build I recommend: http://deckbox.org/sets/165966

Some of the lands are negotiable but the body of the deck should be played pretty much exactly as is.  I only added one card to the sideboard (4x Gnaw to the Bone) as it is crucial in your match-ups against aggro-heavy decks like RDW.  The other 11 cards in your sideboard are up to you.

Advice on playing the deck is as follows:

Don't be afraid to trade your guys for theirs during combat.  When your guys die they feed your deck whereas your opponents creatures don't do anything when they die.  This means that your guys trade better than theirs all day and you need to use it to your advantage.  Also, don't be afraid to play a Boneyard Wurm on turn 2 just so that it dies.  Sometimes that's the only way to set up a turn 3 Splinterfright.

TyWooOneTime wrote:

Am I correct that once one is in play the werewolves do not transform back to human form unless the Immerwolf is killed?

That is correct!  Immerwolf prevents non-human werewolves from transforming.  Since all of the werewolves printed so far are human-werewolves in their normal state and non-human-werewolves in their flipped state Immerwolf will let them turn but not turn back.

86

(5 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)

Thanks for the kind words!

I haven't been commenting as much lately because I am completely swamped at work and will be for at least another month.  I barely have time to read everything on Deckbox let alone respond to larger topics like this one.  I promise I am still out there and keeping up with the forums but my advice will probably be sparse for a while sad

Someone else will have to pick up the slack for me like TyWooOneTime wink

87

(13 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

New trades should give an e-mail notification.  They come through with the subject like:

<user name> has proposed a configuration for '<trade name>'

Don't like wizard EDH?

Ertai, the Corrupted is a pretty awesome general.

Lol, which list?  The wishlist or tradelist?

90

(10 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)

He's not giving away industry secrets, he's trying to help you.  The vast majority of forum members here are keenly aware of prices and if you are selling cards here they will need to be eBay min or better to actually sell.  You advertising higher prices is an indicator that you're inexperienced at selling here and asmodeanreborn did you a favor in saying so.  It's a good thing smile

Hello everyone.  I am looking to get my hands on some wizards and a few of them are a bit difficult to find so I thought I would try my luck here.

My recently updated tradelist: http://deckbox.org/sets/80751

Especially looking for:

1x Glen Elendra Archmage
1x Ertai, Wizard Adept
1x Lighthouse Chronologist
1x Zur the Enchanter
1x Vendilion Clique

However, I am interested in everything on my wishlist (below).

http://deckbox.org/sets/80752

EDIT: This used to say "everything on my wishlist is for trade".  What an idiot ><

92

(8 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

That is absolutely correct Sebi! I should have clarified the body/head condition in my prior post, sorry sad

93

(8 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

JS files do load synchronously so if bandwidth issues exist between Deckbox.org and your site the browser will halt until it's done downloading.  That being said, I have been running a forum that loads the two different JS files from Deckbox.org and I haven't noticed any speed issues for at least the last year.  It's a low traffic site but still...

In that case I agree.  It's one thing to haggle over who to use for pricing on foils but to artificially inflate your side of the trade without a really good reason is plain old rude. 

I am more bothered by the not wanting to trade the cards unless there was something on the table that the trader really wanted.  People seem to do this often and I just don't get it.  Why are they in your trade list then?  Why not keep them in your inventory and then use the trade forums to communicate your intentions?  IMO, tradelist means it's for trade right now, at the standard price.  I am probably the exception to this rule but if my choices are straightforward trading based on price or subjective trades based on your personal value and/or what you had for breakfast today I'll take the former every time...

Honestly I don't think Trader2 is out of line here but, for the record, I prefer SCG for pricing foils as well.  When comparing foils for trade pricing it shouldn't really matter what website you use as long as you both use the same one.  You wouldn't, for example, price your cards through SCG and theirs through eBay because the markets are different and the oddity that is eBay shipping throws everything out of balance unless it's a single card for a single card. 

With SCG, or a similar site, you get a more accurate reflection of the cost of all the cards in the trade whereas eBayers tend to lower the BiN price to entice you and then pack the loss into the shipping.  Either that or all of the US really believes that stamp+envelope+top-loader+penny-sleeve == $2.50 in which case I weep for our future.

The best advice I can offer is to try hard to explain this concept to the person you are trading with and hope they understand.  If they don't, make sure to capture all of the buyout and shipping costs on both sides of the trade when comparing prices through eBay and then make your decision.  Odds are the person who is trading the highest number of unique cards is going to get the better deal.  If that's you, take the deal and enjoy your winnings; if it's not, walk away from the trade.

I have 4 reverberates.  One of them is the fire&lightning version, is that a problem?

97

(4 replies, posted in Trading Post)

I am in MN, NW Subarbs.

Welcome back to MTG!

I personally feel as though the deathfed deck you have is probably the strongest of the three right now.  Splinterfright was a strong deck in block for a little while and it will take the least amount of effort to complete the deck.

However, I don't know if any of them are going to get you overly far at a tournament.  If you are just going for the experience then it really doesn't matter.  If you're looking to place well then I think you should drop a few hundred dollars (or leverage the awesome trading power of Deckbox.org) to beef up your mono green deck as it is a very viable strategy right now.

I'd love to give more, and better, advice on how to prepare for your next tournament but I don't want to waste your time or mine.  So, if you let me in on what your goal is for the upcoming tournament I will either help you make a great deck or the greatest deck you can make from your current cards (or a small budget).  Deal?

99

(8 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)

I run Tombstone Stairwell in an EDH deck and often combo it with Altar of Dementia.  Maybe run that?

grats