Search options (Page 5 of 8)

ditto -- I'm looking for the piledrivers and maybe a port, but have most of the other stuff.

added:

• show only users who have x items on my wishlist (no detail match).

• show only users who have x items on my wishlist(where details match).

• Ideally all of above would be sortable, or at least the # of items/matches

Also: What are your thoughts in terms of the main criteria being VALUE instead of NUMBER OF CARDS? e.g., I think (if I had to choose), that I'd prefer dollar value that I can send/receive over number of cards. Some people only have one or two cards I want, but they're higher-value cards. I think the value we can trade is more indicative of a good potential trade than just the number of cards by itself (of course, having both would be nice).

It's not on your list, but I have a NM foil tangle wire I'm looking to trade if you're interested.

proposal sent.

I would love to see cards of mismatched versions, or at least of unspecified versions, appear in the trading opportunities window. For example - I haven't specified the version of Ponder that I have. My partner has specified only Lorwyn version. It turns out that I have some from Lorwyn -- I'd at least like to see that we have a possible match. I have over 12K cards on here, and I can't possibly go back and enter the version on all of them, but in many cases possible trading matches aren't showing up.

I'd also love it if cards with only one version could auto-populate that version -- or at least, we could turn that on.

Lastly -- the default pricing -- I think it makes more sense to leave the default pricing of an unspecified card as the LOWEST priced version, as opposed to the most recent version -- it will provide an incentive for people to specify their versions, since adding the version can only increase your price/value.

I don't have any extra attributes specified in my wishlist, and the issue seems to affect people who have specified some attributes, as well as people who have not specified any. Just seems to be a bug?

I have 14 cards to something called "Young Jedi" that I found in a box of cards I got. Not sure of those are the same thing, but happy to get rid of them if they're relevant.

I agree that it may be overkill. I'll continue to use the site either way. I've managed to complete 300 trades without a major issue, although a handful of minor ones.

I'll leave it to Sebi and the devs to decide if it's worth it or not, or if they can implement it simply. Since he seemed interested in my idea to the point of suggesting a mockup, I responded with my own.

As I said further up in the thread, my biggest fear is that with more clarity around the rules, that some people may take advantage of those rules, and would lead to a change in the culture of deckbox, where people don't trust eachother or look for excuses to take advantage of others (i.e., common complaint with some other online trading boards with very strict rules).

I might not force everyone to enter additional comments for a perfectly smooth trade. What I might do is something like this:

Feedback phase:
+1 = Perfect trade, no issues [does not see follow-up]
+1 = Good completed trade, but some minor issues (e.g., card condition, delays, lost mail)
0 = Satisfactory trade, but significant issues
-1 = Bad trade, did not receive cards

The last 3 options would drive some sort of secondary list, where you could select all that apply. I'd suggest that each check-box possibly require an explanation. My list would look like this

(X all that apply)
[ ] Card condition significantly worse than described/expected [please specify]
[ ] Wrong/missing cards included [please specify]
[ ] Trader changed cards after trade accepted [please specify]
[ ] Significant mail/delivery delay [please specify]
[ ] His/Her cards did not arrive at first, and had to resend [please specify]
[ ] My cards did not arrive to him/her at first, had to resend [please specify]
[ ] Poor communication or etiquette [please specify]
[ ] Other [please specify]

As I said, I'd love to be able to look at someone's trades, and see that X% of them had delays or poor communication or lost mail, so I could be wary.

I don't want these comments to be seen as punishment -- I've made many of these errors myself. I've still given and received +1s because we can work it out, but it'd be massively useful to see patterns with certain behavior.. And I also think that tracking this will make it somewhat of a deterrent for bad traders.

Hopefully something like this wouldn't be too hard to implement. Happy to take other feedback or add other reasons. I don't want to add a million reasons-- I think probably 5 or 6 is enough, and encourage people to write comments explaining why.

[EDIT] I suppose if you left -1 feedback, some of those options probably don't apply, and you should see a separate list, or maybe just enter in a detailed comment, since most likely your cards never arrived.

I have one available to trade, but I'm not seeing enough in your tradelist to tempt me. Any willingness to trade FoW?