1,226

(3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Added. Thanks for the idea.

1,227

(389 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

100001539073253 wrote:

Price issue with 3 cards from Speed vs Cunning:

Arcanis the Omnipotent
Shock
Zurgo Helmsmasher

are all listed at $14.95, but that's not the price for sure! Please fix.

Fixed now, thanks for reporting.

Kammikaze wrote:
sebi wrote:

But I suppose it would be better to remove them when the order is placed & paid for....

And then replaced into the wishlist if the order gets cancelled.

Correct.

Wrote this down, will look to change it after the CSV issues.

Helios52 wrote:

Yes I think that might be why. Since I have multiple offers that the heath(s) are included in but are cancelled before being accepted, they are re added to my trade list and inventory. I curently only own 3 heaths (1 foil, 2 non foil) and I adjust the amount but if I cancel a trade that has a Heath included, it re adds 2 of them back to my trade list and adds 2 more to my inventory count.

Very weird. I tested this and seems to not happen. Is it possible that they were canceled just before I wrote that this was fixed? I think it might be possible, judging by the timestamps of the trades in your canceled trades listing.

gumgodMTG wrote:

Does ordering cards remove them from my wishlist, or are they removed once they are marked shipped?

Right now they are only removed from your wishlist after you receive them, and you click "Add to my Inventory".

But I suppose it would be better to remove them when the order is placed & paid for....

Helios52 wrote:

Something else I noticed, that it keeps readding cards to my trade list that I take off it. Ie. I've had to keep removing the windswept heaths in my trade list and inventory even after I change them.

Hmm, this should have been fixed just when I posted before. How does it happen? By having a proposed trade that you cancel where the Windswept Heath is added as tradeable by you?

LovesTha wrote:

I guess the next biggest item on my person wish list: Being able to view the history (when it was confirmed, addresses exchanged, cards sent/received) of a trade after it is completed.

You can see now when cards were sent & received on completed trades. Not accepted & addresses confirmed though.

Fixed now. Thank you very much psyllogism & helios for reporting. Ugly mistake on my part with canceling proposed trades.

psyllogism wrote:

This will probably resolve itself pretty quickly as people cancel/complete trades, but I found out that if I canceled a trade that was proposed before this change was implemented, it added duplicates of the cards from my side of the trade into my inventory. Luckily they were small trades and I caught it quickly ("Wait a sec, I don't own two Polluted Deltas...").

The trade was actually not accepted, right? Just proposed? Because in this case it should not add the cards at all back to your inventory since they would not be removed.

Looking into this.

Hmm could you link the trade in question? This should not happen.

1,237

(10 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

gumgodMTG wrote:

I agree with the request to put the prices next to the card version.  I also posted a screen shot of this in another thread.

Thank you for the clarifications.

Added back those prices now.

A long discussed issue and a cause for double-trading cards and other mistakes was that cards were just removed from inventories when a user marked his cards as sent.

Many users have suggested that the best way to handle this situation is to remove the cards when a trade is accepted instead.

All trades that will become accepted FROM NOW ON will have this behavior. Trades accepted and ongoing before this release, will behave the same as they did before.

To clarify, old system behavior was:

- trade is proposed
- trade is accepted [nothing happens to your sets]
- addresses are confirmed
- person A sends cards [they are removed from his inventory & tradelist]
- person B sends
- person B receives cards [they are removed from his wishlist, added to his inventory]


New behavior:

- trade is proposed
- trade is accepted [cards from both sides are removed from inventories & wishlists]
- addresses confirmed
- person A sends [nothing happens to sets]
- person B receives [cards he received are added to his inventory]


https://www.dropbox.com/s/a8l805fm6q9ecxp/Screenshot%202014-10-06%2013.55.20.png?dl=1

In case a trade is canceled before you marked the cards as sent, they will be returned to your inventory & tradelist.


Other fixes

* User links in trading opportunities open in new tab now again.
* Fixed "Clear All" button on trading opportunities filters
* Fixed an issue with facebook login
* Fixed an issue with accessing js files through https
* Added prices back to "my collection" listing on card pages

1,239

(14 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

2bithero wrote:

What classifies as a large inventory? Im having the same issue, but I wouldn't have thought mine is particularly big (under 4000 unique cards).

It is right now disabled for all inventories with more than 1000 cards. But I am working on rewriting it, should be back & usable in a couple of days. I will post an announcement when it is deployed.

1,240

(17 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

We do want to address the buying and selling of playsets too, not sure yet in which way but it's definitely on the list.

Thanks for the feedback and keep it coming. We want to fix whatever issues you have with our system, so you do not have to go sell cards on EBay smile.

1,241

(17 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

joecat wrote:

I do believe the buyer can leave negative feedback on any refunded payment without permission of the deckbox team.

If they leave negative without reading and abiding by seller policies, we will remove it. The buyers also see a message on their order saying they should read the seller profile before submitting.

1,242

(10 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

mrsfrost71 wrote:

We know it still works - but now it does not show the individual cards with their individual prices like it use too

Which prices are missing? The same prices as before are displayed, only now they are to the left of the card image instead of on top of it. You can select a different printing from the menu on top, just like it was before (only the button looks different now).

Plus the actual "add to inventory" is on the bottom of the screen.

This might be an issue indeed, I'm also not completely satisfied with the positioning.

now are slower than dirt because it's clunky and cumbersome?

It should not be any slower than before, if it is I am sorry, and will try to profile it and improve its performance.

The old dialog version had many problems and usability issues that we just did not know how to solve. I am sorry you do not like the new version, and I will try to think how to improve it.

CSV export has some problems, I'm currently rewriting it. Should be available again later this week.

1,244

(10 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Ctrl-I still works, and it opens the card page in a new tab, so you do not have to navigate away from the current page.

What do you mean by "less than optimal"? smile

What specifically bothers you about them?

1,246

(14 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Jassi, as far as I can discern, the TL;DR of the stuff you wrote is that in your opinion fairportmagic should get out with no repercusions from this (ongoing) scandal.

That is not possible.

1,247

(14 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

jassi007 wrote:

So another user has opened a BTR to early. https://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=22802 Curious if he'll be receiving a negative or if fairpointmagic got one because basically he annoyed the deckbox mods. Or if in fact he got a negative on one trade because of his dissatisfaction with the outcome of a different trade.

What are you suggesting jassi? That we just let fairportmagic go with 100% feedback after we cannot reason with him? Don't YOU want to know when visiting his profile that he has behaved the way he did in 2 consecutive BTRs?

Looking forward to your answer.

1,248

(7 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Investigating, not sure what happened, server was under very high / abnormal load last evening.

1,249

(14 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I have edited out my previous reply, it was tactless. Apologies.

To get back clear headed to the matter at hand, if we do not enforce a -1, the only other way to punish him would be to completely suspend him from trading. We have no other ways to indicate that he was involved in a convoluted, problematic BTR where in the end he could not even come to an agreement with the site administrator, let alone his trading partner.

1,250

(14 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

edited