1

(1 replies, posted in NLML)

well done, I think this setup is a good one- rewarding both good play and participation while spreading the love around.  I know some peeps were super busy this week, so their game numbers are down, but win % is still strong- so they are totally in the running for stuff.  I also like the one prize per person- spread the love around.

Overall I've had a blast with NLML, been happy with the set up and the prize distro continues the trend.

2

(3 replies, posted in NLML)

if you are selfish enough to have a child during the Nerdery League Magic League, than I feel strongly you need to deal with the consequences.
Or, maybe you just play so many games before you leave that at the end of it only Eric and Bill have more than you do and we just go with that win %?  I would guess that you are on track for that second option, even if you were out the next week and a half...

3

(7 replies, posted in NLML)

i get what mike is saying, but in practice, the two decks are significantly weaker than one good deck, so i say go for it.  if nothing else, it is amusing and potentially fun.
Come to think of it, since this is the only format where you could do it, if you have the means, I say do it!

4

(3 replies, posted in NLML)

most of my matches have been very close grinders- with games on friday i squeaked out a winning record, but barely.  White/Blue can delay the game all day long, but my deck at least needs another bomb to help close the deal.  Black/red aggro is pretty sweet and i have grown to hate both stab wound and the 1/1 black lifelink flier.

5

(2 replies, posted in NLML)

just a quick question- can the winners use their winning packs to improve their decks?  i'm torn on the idea, though i'm much more ok with it if we have lots of winners, lots of prizes, rather than one or two big winners.