1

(1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

There are ways to restrict who can see what on your collection/haves for trade. The tools are there already.

2

(0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Would it be possible to just get an option to sort decks by alphabetization only? I don't want my deck sorted by color or card type, just have it alphabetized in simple letter order. I build my decks by list after playtesting, and just have the list of cards, and don't want to have to go through all of the different types over and over....

3

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Yeah I can definitely agree there.

4

(1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Is there a way to setup a checkmark system to be able to add multiple cards at once from the same set or all of standard or something?

5

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Ok thank you for getting back to me, I know you are busy.

6

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Is there some other way to submit ideas so that he will for sure read them and get some sort of response?

7

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Anything here either admins?

8

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Thanks for the answer admins, much appreciated.....

9

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I'd like to know the chances of changing an area of cards like tradelist entire collection, a searchable criteria, to all  the same of something, like condition/language or whatever?

10

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Would it please be possible that if a card only has one printing the DB would just assume it's that edition and stop with the editionless, at the very least default to the most recent non-foil edition or something?

Says it's password protected....

12

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

we need to be able to export to more than just CSV, cockatrice, and MTGO formats would be nice.

13

(0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I was wondering if it would be possible to get a list of like 10 page numbers to be better able to navigate trade or wishlist of people with multiple dozens of pages easier? Having to go page by page is kinda annoying, and last or first doesn't really help much if they have like 60 pages. I know other pages have like 5 up and 5 down links for multipage lists, so it shouldn't be too hard here.

14

(0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Is it possible to set a user level override for prices? Basically, let us set our own price on cards in our collection, and set it to check and display that price instead of the deckbox mean price?

15

(4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I can kinda see that, but that would be more of a user brought up thing. Where they get neutral feedback, and feel like it's not bad enough to warrant negative feedback, and so count themselves lucky. My issue is with people that immediately jump to neutral feedback and don't give you chance to make things right and get a positive for little things you could have fixed.

16

(4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I would like to open a discussion about adding some rules to when it's appropriate to leave neutral feedback. We already have clear guidelines on negative, but I think some people are quicke to leave neutral feedback when it's not really warranted. As long as everything done was within the guidelines listed on the site, I would think that the default would be positive feedback with reasons being required for neutral, and approval being needed to leave negative (which we have now). What does the community/mods think?

17

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Sweet thanks!

18

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I was wondering if there could be an option to post something that you are willing to purchase at a certain price? Similar with the sales offers, this would be a buy offer. Thoughts?

19

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I would like to see the option of using either price as well.

20

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Ah must have missed the 4.4 thanks for clearing it up.

21

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I would like someone opening a false BTR to be a negative feedback worthy event. Someone currently can just open a btr without solid evidence, or for something that is not a BTRable offense, and there are no repercussions. Mods, what do you think?

22

(197 replies, posted in Announcements)

I have to say that I am sad to see this turn of events. There is no way this sort of site could support three people as it was, and I doubt it will now have the traffic to support three people as it is. This site should have been looked at like a second job or a hobby out of love. This site was great while it lasted. Managing the prices is a pain in the arse, and this site's main draw WAS the main reason to use it. I am not sure if I will be cancelling all my trades or not, I will have to see what the values look like....

23

(0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Would it be possible to get a list of page numbers on the inventory, tradelist, and wishlist pages? I have 55 pages of trade stuff, and getting to page 26 by clicking next 25 times is kinda annoying..... maybe just something that shows like 5 page links at a time each direction?

24

(0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Foil prices only display median, not whatever the user's setting are for display. Case in point, angel of serenity displays at 13.78 not 10.92 like tcgplayer low is currently. Is there a way to link this to the user's price display preferences?

25

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Awesome man. Glad to hear the feedback is being listened to.