Helios52 wrote:Mattssacre wrote:morph66 wrote:26 (100% positive)
The rating system on this site is very flawed. This person has obviously had a lot of shady transactions in the last little while, but everyone that trades with him still see's the perfect score on 26 transactions. How can he be this shady with so many people and still not warrent a bad feedback?
First off the whole Plus/Minus system is flawed to begin with. Even though ebay's system sucks, it would be nice to have something like that here. Individual rating for communication, shipping time, card condition, etc. Too many people are scared to give zero's or negatives because they don't want to receive a bad comment back.
There is no perfect system. Both Deckbox and eBay rating systems are based on people's bias opinion so the flaw lies more with people than the system. If you didnt have to get approval to get negative feedback (which is how it was BEFORE the new update), it would turn into a pissing match over what happened and who really deserves the negative feedback and the deckbox team having to constantly change peoples rating.
much better to just give everybody gold stars
and no i had no idea all other sites do it. I still think it's a pretty piss poor way to track members. I mean this guy has been over 3 weeks late on several people's orders and he still doesn't bite a bad feedback? sorta pathetic, the mods should do a better job of i.p banning people who can't hold to their word. Also should be a minimum age limit to subscribe. As it stands a ten year old could make an account and do some real damage...
Last edited by morph66 (2013-09-12 00:23:33)