1

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

They should be in the corresponding "extras" section for SOI, but apparently were never added: https://deckbox.org/editions/394-extras … -innistrad

The checklist cards are the only cards not in the database, as far as I'm aware.

2

(1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

You can try exporting your inventory (Tools -> Export) and sorting by Condition in Excel.

3

(4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

A roadmap of planned features would be wonderful. If there's anything we as a community can do to help, I'm sure people would volunteer time. Suppose that some features could be implemented, but gathering/validating the data and putting it in the correct format is a barrier to progress. Having more transparency about upcoming features would let us organize and help speed things along, instead of complaining or otherwise venting our frustrations unproductively.

BetweenWalls wrote:

Request: See Cheapest Printing instead of Last Important Printing - July 2016
For cards in decks, tradelists/wishlists, and actual trades that don't have a specific printing marked, we currently see the set and price info for the 'last important printing'. It would be useful to instead see info for the cheapest printing for multiple reasons. It would: ...

BetweenWalls wrote:

Tokens should be differentiated based on color, type, abilities, & P/T - December 2014
Glad to see that tokens are in the database, but it seems they're only classified by their name. This is troublesome, because there are many cases of different tokens having the same name. 'Soldier', for example, has 4 different kinds: ...

BetweenWalls wrote:

Request: Sorting Wishlist by Importance - June 2016
I sent a link to my wishlist to another player today, and would have preferred to sort it by whether the cards are important. It appears that the 'Important' flag is not visible publically. Don't know why that's the case, but it'd be nice to make it public for just such an occasion. Sorting by that flag would be even nicer.

4

(23 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I want to reiterate a currently functional method for storing location info:

1. Create a virtual deck for each location and put them all in one folder.
2. When adding or removing physical cards, do the same for their virtual 'location decks'

  • To make finding locations faster, use a naming convention that makes them visually distinctive. For example, I precede each deck name with three hyphens. ( --- Trade Binder #1 ) That way, I can quickly find where the cards are even if the card page has numerous other decks mixed alongside the 'location decks'.

  • This same method works for regular decks as well. (I use "!" as a naming convention for those) Also, if you have a large main storage location like me, don't bother creating a deck for it; anything that doesn't have an affiliated 'location deck' can be inferred to be there. Even if it it's split among multiple boxes, as long as there are rules for those splits, (by rarity, set, color, type, foils, etc) it's easy to go straight to the correct box.

  • If a location's cards are added to the inventory without a 'location deck', just sort the inventory by date added and narrow down the first and last cards added from that location by checking inventory cards against the physical location. Then, just export that list and add it to the 'location deck'.

  • It's often not necessary to remove cards from their 'location deck' if you're trading or selling them. If a card isn't in your inventory, its presence in any 'location decks' can safely be ignored.

Example
Finding where specific versions of cards are can actually be relatively simple. Even in the not-so-simple Fireblast page below, I can determine where each copy is, due to a few organizational rules. I'll explain the process in detail.

Only 10 of the 15 have "---" or "!", so the other 5 must be in my big storage box, (categorized in the 6cmc red instants section) and consequently marked for trade. There are 8 total for trade, so the other 3 can only be in the "---" marked locations (My decked cards are rarely marked for trade). One of those locations is "--- Sealed DD: Jace v [Chandra]---", so clearly 2 of the 3 are there, and they're the 2 JVC versions. The last one for trade should be in the "--- Trade Binder #1", since that only contains tradelisted cards; of the tradelisted versions, the FNM foil seems the most tradeable (i.e. valuable). By process of elimination, the 4 gold-bordered editions and one Visions edition should be in the big box together.

That leaves 7 non-tradelisted Fireblasts: 5 are in regular decks (Goblins and Burn) and 2 are in the only remaining locations: Cube and EDH Foils. I prefer original-printing foils for cube, so that leaves the Fire and Lightning edition foil for the EDH Foils location, and the 5 Visions editions are in Goblins and Burn.

  • Deck names can store extra info. If, for some reason, I preferred the F&L edition in cube, I could record that exception in the notes of the Cube 'location deck' and make the name something like "! Cube (non-proxied) *E:Fireblast" with E for Exceptions, or just "! Cube (non-proxied) [Exceptions in notes]" so mousing over the title on the card page would alert me to click through and realize that the cube has a different edition than I would normally prefer.

http://i.imgur.com/sGFzCGQ.png

5

(1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

This would be great to have, if only to see whether certain features have been previously requested. It would help prevent rehashing the same requests and instead direct any discussion toward new ideas or better solutions for old ideas.

6

(6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I use decks for this purpose, and have a naming convention to signify whether a "deck" is a binder/box, or even a built deck that's stored somewhere in particular. My main 'collection' box is too big to realistically be used for this (the site would crash trying to load it), but everything else is small enough to be modifiable when I add/remove cards. If there isn't a signifier for a card I have, then I know it's in the main box.
                         
These sub-collections aren't searchable, but as a way to find where individual cards are, it works well enough for me.

7

(17 replies, posted in Announcements)

meldon44 wrote:

How is everybody dealing with the double-faced tokens (not just in Commander 2016 but in the other products that have them)?

I believe I've added some to deckbox before realizing they don't really fit here. My answer: Excel

8

(23 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Yeah. I agree that it would be useful for instances like that. As for the double entry issue, you can just copy a list of the cards after adding them to your inventory (sort by 'last added') from specific locations. That way, you don't have to retype every card name.

9

(23 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Unless you need to label where specific versions of each card is, decks can be used to accomplish this.

For each trade, it would be nice to have a record of when cards were added/removed.

Why this would be useful:

  • Additions to large trades are annoying, as 1 card isn't easily recognizable among 30+ others. If this happens more than once, it can become a nightmare to keep track of all the small changes.

  • Removed cards are often more annoying (even for smaller trades), since no record of them remains on the trading page. Combing through pages of tradelists to discover which card(s) were removed? No thanks.

Currently, the lack of change history restricts back-and-forth adjustments enough to make trading noticeably less dynamic than it could be - a changelog would foster a more fluid, life-like style of trading.


Notes:

  • This would be most useful for active trades; removing it from finished/cancelled trades could be done if storage space is a concern.

  • Relative order of card changes would be most important, but showing them alongside chat messages (or using timestamps if they're separate) would be even more useful.

This version of Nekrataal uses the wrong image. It should have a white border:

https://deckbox.org/mtg/Nekrataal?printing=2123

It seems other cards from the Battle Royal Box Set have the same issue.

12

(1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Yes, there is. You can import cards from a CSV (comma separated values) file, including set info or any other info. The easiest way to see how the file should be formatted is to export your inventory first - this will give you a CSV file (openable by Excel) with the correct headers. Simply replace the card info with whatever you want to import, then select "Add Cards" > "From a CSV file" on Deckbox and choose that file. You may need to use 'Gatecrash' instead of '[GTC]', but you can easily use the 'find and replace' feature of Word or Excel to do that. That same feature can alter other formatting differences to match Deckbox's too.

I often find myself using the 'Choose Printing' dropdown from a card's page to hunt for the cheapest version of that card, find the lowest price for tournament legal versions (gold-bordered and oversized cards are often the cheapest version and used as the minimum), or just to compare a card's price from different sets. It doesn't take an exorbitantly amount of time, but it can be kind of annoying to reload the page a few times in order to find out.

It would be useful if the 'disambiguation' page showed this info for all printings. Those prices could be included in the 'Choose Printing' dropdown adjacent to each version.

14

(3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

This kind of thing would require a 'completed deck' feature, I think. Otherwise, it would find loads of incomplete decks and non-decks when comparing cards. I know I have more of the latter than the former, at least.

15

(13 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

settlerjoe wrote:

Perhaps .20 would be a better cutoff?

I was under the impression that the $0.30 cutoff is just an example - you can see the same thing by adding a $0.30 filter and clicking View > Total Set Value, or use any other filter(s) you like and see the value for the filtered cards.

16

(2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

I believe you can actually paste cards into the sideboard as well by preceding sideboard cards with "sideboard:" in the mass card entry field. To be honest, I realized this functionality by mistake when copying a decklist. Example:

4 Lightning Bolt
4 Delver of Secrets
4 Preordain

Sideboard:
3 Dispel
3 Electrickery

For cards in decks, tradelists/wishlists, and actual trades that don't have a specific printing marked, we currently see the set and price info for the 'last important printing'. It would be useful to instead see info for the cheapest printing for multiple reasons. It would:

1. Encourage updating collection set info so that traders get the full value of their cards. When a card's market value is higher than others due to its more desirable printing, the onus is placed on its owner to clearly present such information, as opposed to the current system which encourages traders to hide such set information when their card's value is lower than the last important printing's value.

2. Protect users automatically from the above situation by making the cheapest set and its corresponding price the default. It's better to presume that users are most familiar with their own cards and incentivize them to provide info about their cards than to require users to request set info during trades or risk a poorer trade than they would otherwise have.

3. Drive card prices more strongly toward a market equilibrium by preventing uninformed traders from valuing cards above the market price. It's reasonable to think that the price displayed during trades by default is accurate, and the more knowledgeable party (who has access to the cards) should have the responsibility for updating it if it is not.

4. Encourage trading by reducing investment in irrelevant details. If a user doesn't specify a card printing for a card in their wishlist, it's safe to assume they don't want a specific printing of that card. Users should not be punished for failing to investigate prices of different card printings that they would otherwise have no reason to investigate.

These are interelated issues that, once addressed, would make trading on Deckbox a more transparent and enjoyable experience, especially for new users. While I think it's clear to see that this change should ideally be made default for trades and the other areas of the site, an option to enable such a setting would be preferable to the current system for the reasons outlined above.


EDIT: 'Cheapest Printing', in this context, should only include tournament-legal cards. Gold bordered or oversized cards are more than just aesthetically different and showing the info for the cheapest printing doesn't make sense if cards like them are included in such a display.

The double sided Demon/Angel token from Avacyn Restored has the wrong art for the Demon side:

https://deckbox.org/mtg/Demon?fromqs=tr … ting=25857

Upon closer inspection, it seems the double sided card is the 'Helvault Experience' version, so both sides are mislabeled and/or have incorrect art. It seems like a good idea to also provide the 'see other side' feature that's included on regular double sided cards.

I'm currently working to improve my physical collection's organization (and hopefully get back into trading), and came across this issue again. It seems trading for tokens may still be kind of a hassle, since different tokens with the same name can't be differentiated in many cases. (except for specific printings - but then the trade matcher may be too strict to be useful)

I sent a link to my wishlist to another player today, and would have preferred to sort it by whether the cards are important. It appears that the 'Important' flag is not visible publically. Don't know why that's the case, but it'd be nice to make it public for just such an occasion. Sorting by that flag would be even nicer.

21

(2 replies, posted in General Discussion)

If you haven't already asked around the MTGSalvation forum, they have an active cubing community:

http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/the- … cube-forum

Also, cubetutor.com is a great site for organizing (and even virtually drafting) your own cube.

Huh, thanks. Seems you still have to do that per card, but it's certainly an improvement.

Building or modifying new decks on Deckbox can be frustrating for all but 'finished' decks, as moving cards between the mainboard/sideboard/scratchpad requires you to delete the cards from one section and re-find and add them to the other. Doing that for each card can add up quickly! It would be nice to have the option of using the "Card actions" dropdown menu to select a new option: "Move to sideboard" (or mainboard/scratchpad) and be done with it in a single click. Thanks!

The Origins DFC checklist token is missing. Its number is 000/272.

Image: http://images.chaoscards.co.uk/images/p … 498800.png

Friendly bump. Any word on whether something like this will be considered?