https://article.hareruyamtg.com/article/16545/?lang=en&fbclid=IwAR0A1vSc0OW-bX5axhW8I78l4j3JintGt-12rDHdcwAoyPw91Folf2jTDQs

https://twitter.com/HellKatMTG/status/1069631651863543808?fbclid=IwAR3w4YqrnUCSZ3kFej-iNzIwTx4iI7R7DxYBNpvMtkKD8uU4KZLQt3cn4Cg

--U/W -3 path -3 image +2 knight +2 thalia +1 teeg +1 stroke one of my op brought in stony game 2 so i swapped the vials out for one path two image after seeing it
--Tron -3 path -3 vial -2 captian -1 image +2 thalia +2 knight +2 stony +1 sphere +1 teeg +1 stroke
--Humans -4 wanderer -2 giest +2 knight +1 command +1 worship +1 settle +1 sphere. Sphere felt like it could be a liability with knight certainly coming in on their side. i think its still worth it seeing its probably going to perform better than the geist or wanderer will but im still unsure.
--Lantern -4 path -3 vial -1 company +1 teeg +1 sphere +2 knight +2 stony +2 thalia versions of lantern style decks vary so cards like rip and d stroke can be considerations depending on how you feel they are running their deck.
--Scales -3 vial - 2 geist -2 wanderer -2 coco it might should be 4 coco but wanderer doesnt have too many targets outside nat claim and stirrings, and Coco loses hits post board, i feel the matchups good no matter having coco or not so maybe all coco's out is best.