Search options (Page 11 of 54)

Realistically, I think that all the color pairings have a shot.  It's still far too early to make heads-or-tails out of what new decks will come out of BNG.

My current sense is the following:

1) Mono-Black Devotion just got the pieces it was lacking to benefit one of its worst match-ups, aggro.  As a result, there will be no shortage of MBD players out there.  That and everyone already dropped the cash to build the damned thing before BNG...

2) Mono-Blue Devotion didn't really get much in this set and, much to their dismay, actually lose ground as MBD scored some rather effective removal against them.  Whereas it was a 50/50 match-up before, I really think it's probably a 70/30 split in MBD's favor now... meaning that Mono-Blue is likely going to decline a fair degree.  It won't disappear completely, but it's going to be less of a powerhouse than it has been as of late.

3) Azorius Control also got stronger with added card draw (Ephara) and, most importantly, its scry lands.  Expect this deck to continue being competitive and it should grow to a larger portion of the meta.

4) Other fringe decks that were teetering on the edge of Tier 1 either just got the bump they needed to be Tier 1 or fell clearly down to Tier 2
     - RDW - clearly Tier 2 for the time being

     - R/W devotion - likely very low end Tier 1 or Tier 2 (it just isn't consistent enough)

     - White Weenie - likely just made the jump to clear Tier 1 (did you pre-order Brimaz at the low-low price of $25 each?)

     - R/G devotion/stomp - Xenagos, God of Revels has completely transformed this build and I envision it   
       moving up to clear Tier 1 standing

     - W/G aggro - this was a well suited deck before and now it has better mana... likely a clear Tier 1 deck

     - Orzhov humans/mid-range - both appreciate a few cards from BNG, but Drown in Sorrow really hurts
       them.  They'll likely hang around at the lower end of Tier 1, but will be less common.

     - Others?  Well, that's certainly a good question...

5) I envision some other build(s) coming out of nowhere to really put up good numbers.  Whether it's U/B control/mill, some heroic build, Conley Woods' G/B "Dredge" that he refuses to let go, or something else that comes out of left field... well... this is sort of the point of brewing

So, what's the best route to go?  I can see where R/B is well suited against a fair number of match-ups but you really have to choose whether you're going a more mid-range/control direction or aggro... sadly outside of getting access to both Anger of the Gods AND Drown in Sorrow there isn't much sense to go this route.  B/W humans aggro was a better aggro build than R/B aggro and it's not like Rakdos scored a major hit with BNG.  For the mid-range or control build, you get some added power, but MBD really just does that better.  So, outside of a few tools here or there, I don't see Rakdos dominating anytime soon.

R/W is inconsistent in how it plays.  As I heard from an opponent at GP Vancouver, you either pulled the nut draw and nothing could stop you or you didn't and you probably lost... not exactly a recipe for continued success.

R/G I think is the safest route to go, but also likely the most followed path.  Xenagos really is that good.  Things like Savageborn Hydra and Kalonian Hydra can literally end the game the turn they hit the field.  MBD only has so many instant speed removal options and the haste from Xenagos really just punishes them over and over.  Mono-blue can't deal with threats which are THAT large on a consistent basis, nevermind siding in 3x Mistcutter Hydra and pairing them with Xenagos.  You have Anger in the SB for more aggro decks and just waltz through games.

Personally, I like the idea of going full three-color either into Jund or Naya as some of the combinations are just nasty (and you have almost all the temples you need!).  Sylvan Caryatid is fun to accelerate out a T3 Desecration Demon or to pair Xenagos with said demon is fun.  Toss in Rakdos's Return and you're having a good time (don't forget Bile Blight, Drown in Sorrow, Anger of the Gods, Dreadbore, AND Hero's Downfall).  The mana might be a bit sketchy at first, but it works out well enough to be powerful.  Naya... go read Aurelia, the Warleader and then re-read Xenagos, God of Revels... yeah.  Toss in the fact you have all the temples and shocks, Anger, Chained to the Rocks, Brimaz, Smiter, Fleecemane, etc etc.

I can link you to preliminary builds I've been tinkering with in both those color combos if you like, but realistically I think you have all the pieces you need to be REALLY competitive and possibly Tier 1 with those builds.

So I'll be honest when I say that Azorius control will cost a fortune and there really isn't much sense trying to run a sub-optimal build.  That deck, more than most others, really relies on the PWs, dual lands, and chase cards - so think Supreme Verdict, Detention Sphere, and Sphinx's Revelation.  There just aren't any substitutes like there are for other decks, i.e., Doom Blade or Dreadbore are sub-optimal versions of Hero's Downfall, but they can help you save some cash while still getting the job done the most of the time... not so much for Azorius control.

Are you just pre-disposed toward control or did you just pick a deck?  There are a ton of budget options that you can look into if you're just looking to win a few games - sadly most require a LOT of investment in the mana-base.  I would suggest looking around at the colors, mechanics, and strategies you enjoy most for guidance on the type of deck you really want to run with.  THEN, we can try to figure out a good way for you to proceed.

I will say that if you're into controlling builds and don't want to drop a ton of cash, you can look into Maze's End as an option.  It's a bit unconventional but isn't terribly suited against most tier-1 decks and will likely take some folks by surprise at your local FNMs.

Give us a bit more input and we'll see about giving you some ideas.

I'm all for innovation.  I've been play-testing a TON of different ideas as of late and am open to something new, but the devotion decks have been pretty well defined for a while and don't have that much room for change as, well, they've been tried and run enough to work out the kinks.  Most of the "ideas" really just translate into sub-optimal builds.  That being said, there's a TON of space for innovation if you're interested in going other routes - R/W heroic, mono-red burn (oddly not really done yet), different takes on R/G, anything successful in R/U, R/B anything other than mid-range, etc etc... and those are just the ideas using red as their central color.  My suggestion is to look at the other decks and maybe make 1-2 card substitutions, but be aware that you're likely not making the deck better outside of your local meta (it sucks, but it's the reality of the matter).

If you get a second, third, or fourth copy, they can be used to stack your mana - activate one, then drop the next for your land-drop for the turn and use the mana in the pool to activate the new one.  This exact process is part of how G/R devotion can absolutely explode with mana (Voyaging Satyr or not).  Yes, you have a LOT of colored symbols.  But that is actually all the more reason to run 3-4x.  You will ALWAYS want to have one and the best way to ensure you actually draw one is to run more.  If you're not comfortable with 4x, that's fine, but you'll want no less than 3x, otherwise you might as well just run all Mountains and you'll be missing out.

While Madcap strikes you as a good option on paper (and it will perform in some matchups) it really just invites the opponent to two-for-one given the wealth of removal that is circulating these days.  Perhaps if the deck were more aggro based it would make sense, but I just don't think it'd be a safe move given the current meta.  You might be able to sneak it in if mono-black loses some favor...

Here's a list I just tossed together in a few minutes that would probably be a bit more ideal for what you're shooting for.

http://deckbox.org/sets/601793

No guarantees as I've yet to really test it, but it MIGHT could do something.

So very first thing, the link cannot contain a period at the end or it won't link to the deck.  So I'd be sure to go back and fix that in your original post.

Second, based on the fact you said you're new, I'm assuming this is just for casual table-top play with your friends?  Or are you planning on braving local FNMs with said deck?

If you're aiming for the latter, you have some work to do before it is standard legal as there are several cards that are no longer legal to use in the format.  Otherwise, the deck could function on the table-top alright once you trim some of the fat, so to speak.

A few tips on deckbuilding more generally:

1) You want to try to utilize creatures and spells to make a full mana curve that starts on the low end and then works its way up.  Typically you'll want to limit the number of high-casting cost spells (>4 or >5) to say 4-8 spells in a deck at most.  You'll note that even the most mid-range decks (don't be afraid to go look at tournament winning decklists as they'll help you learn what makes good decks) don't have that many high end threats as they're often just too slow to survive in most games.  So, that in mind you REALLY need to fill in the lower end of your curve.

2) Typically, you want to identify the core elements of a deck idea and stick to them as closely as possible, using multiples whenever possible.  So you normally will want to include cards as 2-4x rather than 1-offs.  So to that end, identify the cards that are central to your heroic theme and run with it.  Realistically this creates a whole list of cards in the current deck you can yank.

3) Sites like Deckbox are great for figuring out the ideal build for a deck, whether you actually have the cards or not.  Then you can "proxy" up the deck by just using basic lands that you've either written on or with sticky notes attached (pending you don't have a lot of basics to just turn into proxies) to see how the deck plays.  If you're playing table-top, most people are fine with this as you're trying to assess whether it's really worth it to pick up the pieces you need for the deck.

So, how do you move forward from here? 

First I would look at the full set of cards that have the heroic ability in your colors:  http://deckbox.org/games/mtg/cards?f=27aGVyb2lj!793.1.  This will give you a sense of the creatures you have to choose from.  Note that if you were to move into white and red you would have a very different set of options at your disposal. 

Then, once you've decided upon an ideal number of each creature, you can start looking into the various triggers you would want for heroic.  Specifically, the bestow ability was designed to do this and you can see all the bestow cards in those colors here: http://deckbox.org/games/mtg/cards?f=27YmVzdG93!791.3.

If I were you I would look at Hero of Iroas as the core piece of the puzzle and work around him as he will both give you a target for heroic but also will make the cost of bestowing your auras cheaper.  A few other cards I'd look into include: Chained to the Rocks (you can run Sacred Foundry and Blood Crypt to give you a few Mountains), Nighthowler, Eidolon of Countless Battles, Spiteful Returned, Ethereal Armor, Herald of Torment, Phalanx Leader, and both Fabled Hero and Agent of the Fates (which you already had).  These should make up the core of the deck.  If you're looking for a more aggressive build, Tormented Hero, Soldier of the Pantheon, and those sorts of things.  For a more mid-range build, you'll have to look beyond heroic to some of the format staples like Desecration Demon or Gray Merchant of Asphodel to really have that finishing power.

I hope some of this helps... I'd also keep my eyes peeled on TCGplayer's articles in the coming week as Craig Wescoe expressed some interest in trying to brew a W/B heroic deck.  He might end up posting a list that you could use as a departure point to work toward.

Good luck!

Sadly it's likely a much larger proportion than anyone would like... but the real issue is, HOW would one limit the number of bumps?

Even if you don't play, just go and socialize.  This is a very social game by design, so go, talk to people about cards, and if you feel up to it, go ahead and play.  Just remember that everyone should have fun.

My thought has always been to run a combination of both.  You can use Downfall at instant speed on a LOT of things, freeing up your mana on your turn.  For those less pressing critters/walkers, Dreadbore it up.  Although I would probably run a 4-2 split in favor of Downfall.

A few points. 

First off, maybe I'm odd, and I know it's a bit slow, but I always feel like Door of Destinies does a good bit of work in slower tribal decks like this.  The real benefit being that they need artifact removal to deal with that set of pumps.

Second, Whip of Erebos might slide in here quite well, as it provides the option of coming back in late games where you've been outpaced.  All those huge minotaurs with lifelink sounds awfully appealing.

Third, don't stress the lack of a one-drop minotaur.  Keep in mind that they're almost all sitting with 3-toughness, making them able to exchange quite favorably in combat.  You're going to be trading two-for-one against most of their things unless you're facing down larger threats from a mid-range deck.

Fourth, I'm thinking this isn't fast enough to go full-bore aggro.  You'd be better suited to toss in some better removal options.  For instance, Felhide Brawler really doesn't get the job done.  You could just as easily drop them for Drown in Sorrow or Bile Blight.  Additionally, I get that you're trying to emphasize the red side over the black, BUT, you're really losing out on better removal.  For instance, Hero's Downfall just beats pretty much all the burn you have in nine out of ten situations - PW removal, a means to deal with a Desecration Demon, etc.

Fifth, Oracle of Bones really doesn't get you anywhere.  The opponent is going to see that you're not sitting on any meaningful spells and will just refuse to pay the tribute... making it effectively a four-drop 3/1 (which is not exactly ideal).

Sixth, Searing Blood is hands down better than Shock and potentially even Magma Jet.  Presumably the RR cost won't be an issue, and the ability to both burn the opponent while taking out a creature is a big boon.  Toss in that you can redirect that damage to a PW, potentially killing both a PW and a creature for 2 mana... yeah... that's a play to get behind.

Lastly, where's Mogis, God of Slaughter?  Nothing like a guaranteed removal/two damage a turn... it would work in this shell (at least it might).

On average, I think the tribal strategy is almost there but I can't say I think it's going to be super competitive.  You'll catch some folks on bad draws and will squeeze out games here or there, much like the more gimmicky heroic decks out there, but you're likely going to run into a buzz-saw when you face off against one of the modified tier 1 builds.

Best luck!

Format?  Play environment?  Strategy (besides just mill)?  Ideal hand?  C'mon... if you post with the only effort put in is "opinions" and a link to the deck... you're not going to get much effort in return...

Give it time until they are actually released, then values will shift to their respective points.  Prices are always off during pre-order, pre-release, and such.