Search options (Page 21 of 54)

Gideon sounds hilarious... nice thinking!

To start, I have to ask about your FNM environment.  How frequently have you been/played at your current LGS?  Are people there laid back home-brewers or are you normally encountering people ramping up for the next Grand Prix/Pro-Tour Qualifier/StarCityGames Open?  The reason I ask is because unorthodox decks like this can be a lot of fun and can work in the less competitive environments, but if you're going to be playing against a ton of net-deckers who are just running tier 1 lists, well, you're going to lose... a lot.

So I'm guessing the main idea here is to try and capitalize on the counters provided by Advocate of the Beast.  This is a tempting strategy, but not one that I'm entirely sure will be the most competitive.  In the event that the opponent takes out the advocates, you're really just sitting on a few sub-optimal creatures. 

Gladecover Scout and Witchstalker are good pieces care of hexproof, but if you're wanting to go hexproof auras, you would be much better suited to go G/W to include fun things like Ethereal Armor, Unflinching Courage and Fleecemane Lion (nevermind tossing Heliod in there as he makes enchantment creatures with his cleric tokens).  Outside of an aura-centric build, Gladecover Scout really just doesn't get the job done - you would be better swapping them to Elvish Mystics to at least help with some ramping. 

Deadly Recluse also isn't half bad, but it's a purely defensive creature in a deck that, as it appears to me, is meant to try and take advantage of some speed and aggression. 

Tuskers are good, so run with that...

Advocate of the Beast if he's central to the plan, why not 4x of him?

Rumbling Baloth is decent given what you're running with here, but let me ask, which sounds better, a vanilla 4/4 for four, or a 5/5 with scavenge for four, or perhaps a 5/5 with monstrosity that can take out opposing creatures for four?  In this case, you would lose the synergy with Advocate, but Deadbridge Goliath or Polukranos, World Eater is a better choice at the four drop.  Toss in 2-3 Nylea, God of the Hunt and now you're giving them trample and going to town.

Kalonian Hydra is good, but you would obviously do well to have more than 1.

Giant Growth has been a great spell for years and I certainly wouldn't want to begrudge it, but in the same breath, combat tricks outside of bloodrush aren't very common in standard these days, and even among bloodrush, Ghor-Clan Rampager is the only one that sees much play because it pumps AND gives trample.  You would be better suited with some sort of removal here, I'm thinking Pit Fight makes about as much sense as you really can in standard.  Perhaps Giant Growth is the best option as a sort of pseudo removal...

Naturalize as a 4x in the mainboard?  Auras are more common in Theros standard than they have been for a while, but I don't know that it warrants four in the main... nevermind that you really want Fade into Antiquity to be able to exile the gods in the event they ever hit the field.  In either event, I would slide all these to the sideboard.

Hunt the Weak is not bad, but considering that it's sorcery speed and costs four, you'd be better suited with Pit Fight.

Enlarge is good and might even warrant being at 3x.

The enchantments probably don't need to be in here.  On the one hand, if you're going hexproof auras, you might have something, but outside of that, auras are typically bad as they present an easy opportunity for the opponent to two-for-one you.  Alpha Authority might provide hexproof, but honestly, you'd be better just going with creatures that already have it or things like Fleecemane Lion that can be given hexproof in response to some other action.

Hopefully that much makes sense... now I'll give a list of a few cards you're going to want to look into for a mono-green build that should be useful.

Polukranos, World Eater; Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx; Arbor Colossus; Boon Satyr; Deadbridge Goliath; Nylea, God of the Hunt; Garruk, Caller of Beasts; Karametra's Acolyte... there are more, but I'm blanking at the moment...

I hope some of this helps.  Sadly FNMs are frequently not as much fun for home-brewers in many respects unless the environment is right.  So to that end, give all of this mess a look-through and pick out what you can work with, but most importantly, don't be afraid to spend a bit or go exploring to see if another LGS is more welcoming.

Good luck!

Alright, so again, this will depend on the level of competition at your local FNM.

But if you want to be competitive, a LOT of the deck as it currently sits will have to go. 

One thing to remember is that the most consistent decks have 3-4 of most cards because that increases the consistency with which they'll draw them.  As such, you'll want 3-4 copies of the cards you identify as being best.

The next question is which of the three major archetypes you'll want to play.  Among your choices are aggro, where you are just trying to kill the opponent faster than they have a chance to respond; mid-range, where you tend to stall just a little bit and end up playing some major creatures/spells that ultimately just put the game out of reach; or control, where you tend to use most of your efforts to clear the board or otherwise to "control" the flow of the game until you ultimately drop a single threat that just wins the game.  Aggro is naturally the fastest type of deck, but one which either wins big or goes down in flames (there are a lot of times where an aggro deck just isn't going to get there and you have to sit there watching helplessly).  Mid-range is arguably the most versatile, but frequently loses out to control matchups as they're both trying to slow the game down a bit.  Control is grindy, there's no better way to put it - these are the decks that often go to time during rounds or otherwise take 15-25 turns to win games.

With 4x Rakdos Cackler you have the startings of an aggro build, but I'll let you think over which archetype you want to run before delving too much into specific card choices.

So without delving too deeply into changes I would make, which I can do of course, I figured I would answer the question you have at the end.  M13 is no longer Standard legal.  It rotated with the Innistrad block as soon as Theros became standard legal.

That being said, what is the goal of this deck?  Are you going to just keep playing casually, just within the standard format or were you planning on sleeving up for FNM?

My biggest suggestion for newer players (at least to the competitive environment) is to scout out your LGS and possibly a few other FNMs to see where the environment is most welcoming.  Some FNMs are full of people who are just dying for the next Grand Prix, Star City Games Open, or even Pro Tour Qualifier - and as such, the FNMs are loaded with super competitive players who are essentially just seeing how well they can pilot the latest and greatest net-deck (you wonder why some cards have massive jumps in price, that's why... look at Chandra, Pyromaster and Thassa, God of the Sea as recent examples).  For newer players, these types of environments will simply turn you off of Magic and nobody wants to see that (winning certainly isn't everything, but it gets REALLY old getting blown out game after game after game).  Now, if you're lucky or look hard enough, you'll be able to find more relaxed FNMs that will cater more to the home-brewing, playing the game to have fun crowd.  This is where I think you'll be more comfortable, make more friends, make more trades, and overall just enjoy the game and its players more.  Keep in mind you might have to dig around a bit and likely at every FNM you'll find someone who is super competitive, but try to find a more laid back place to play or it can really just ruin the experience.

Having said all of that, I'll let you get back with regard to where you intend to play this before I give specific comments as they'll hinge on the play environment.

Cheers!

If it were me, I would make the following changes:

-4 Bioshift
-4 Triton Tactics
-3 Daxos of Meletis

+1 Ajani, Caller of the Pride
+3 Gods Willing
+3 Mizzium Skin
+1 Brave the Elements
+2 Banisher Priest
+1 Boros Reckoner

You're still sitting at the same number of cards, but then you gain the ability to do a lot more. 

- A second Ajani will increase the chances you actually draw him, and I think you would be hard pressed not to see a benefit from him.

- Gods Willing gives you the ability to make a creature unblockable for a turn, triggers heroic, can remove pesky enchantments from creatures (both yours and your opponent's), OR provides protection against opponent removal.

- Mizzium Skin provides a brief toughness boost or more importantly can provide hexproof to protect your creatures and provides a heroic trigger - note that if there were a card to be tossed, this is probably it and to be honest I can see where Path of Bravery might get more done here.

- Brave the Elements is just that good.  You might as well run the full 4x of them.

- Banisher Priest is a dual purpose card for you.  Not only does it give you another threat on the board, but it can REALLY affect the tempo of the game or otherwise just acts as removal.

- Boros Reckoner is also just that good.  Going up to 2x will give you better chances of drawing one while not putting an insane requirement on your mana (as that triple white is going to be hard to hit reliably).

This likely isn't going to be 100% ideal as it sits.  To be honest, you're close enough to the mono-white aggro lists that were doing real work right after Theros hit that I would suggest just making the change to that.  I mean after all, you're really only getting Aqueous Form by going blue.

Well, so you're completely right that you don't want to go dropping $100 on singles for a deck you might not like.  Thankfully, you really don't have to.  The first option is to build the deck here on deckbox and simulate trial hands with it to see how you think it will perform.  The second option is to proxy up the deck and see how it plays.  This means simply putting basic lands into the sleeves with a piece of paper in front of them that explain what card it is supposed to be - this way you can simulate what it's like to play with the actual deck before you go splurge on all the cards.

My initial reaction would be to find a more laid back LGS to start attending as you really don't want to immerse yourself in an overly competitive environment just starting out (trust me when I say it's no fun running into a $1000 deck when yours is a total of $80).

Now, for the removal question, it depends entirely on the type of play you enjoy, the strategy you're looking to use, and a variety of other factors what is best.  In many instances the burn you see in red is sufficient to take out opposing threats; however, as you experienced in the draft, there are creatures that simply cannot be handled in that way.  Each color has its own sort of removal (or removal like option) and you really just have to decide which you like using.  Black is typically the most straight-forward; however, there are plenty of weaknesses there as black doesn't  have any way to clear the entire board currently in standard (as compared to red - Anger of the Gods & Mizzium Mortars; white - Supreme Verdict w/blue, Merciless Eviction w/black, & Planar Cleansing; etc. etc).  BUT, on the flip side, black's removal tends to be the most unconditional "kill target creature."

With regard to sorting through your cards to build a deck, unfortunately cards that shine as all-stars in draft and sealed formats aren't always the good cards in constructed.  So Sengir Vampire is pretty bad-ass in sealed, but in constructed, Desecration Demon is just plain better - it costs one less to cast, is a 6/6, and in the worst case scenario can serve as repeat removal.  To that end, I would suggest looking through your inventory and through the available sets to identify the cards that you really would enjoy playing with most and then try to build around those.  The alternative would be to look online for ideas, typically by looking at the decks that are performing well in major tournaments (you can find them on magic.tcgplayer.com).

So first off, welcome to the game.

My first suggestion would be to go to your local FNM and just observe.  Depending on your local game shop's environment, you might be able to perform alright with a less polished home brew; however, if it's a more competitive store, you're likely going to just get destroyed.

Having said that, the deck as currently constructed has several issues.  The most pressing being that you're not clearly dedicated to a strategy.  You can really classify decks into one of three types: 1) aggro, 2) mid-range, and 3) control.  The first type is dedicated to putting as many threats on the board as possible and simply smashing face as quickly as possible.  Aggro decks are characterized by lower mana curves, typically ending at four or occasionally five.  Mid-range decks are meant to either ramp into or otherwise just last until you can start dropping bigger threats, typically ones that are harder to deal with.  As a result, your curve will be higher and you'll feature more removal.  The third type of decks are control, which outside of a few late game win-cons, consist of almost nothing other than removal and answers to your opponent's threats.  The plan here is to essentially just control the game until the later turns at which point you can resolve some giant threat that the opponent simply cannot overcome.

You state in your description that you're after a control-type build, yet, you really don't have that much in the way of quality removal.  If you're running black, you need to be sitting on a lot of unconditional removal like Doom Blade, Ultimate Price, Hero's Downfall and Devour Flesh.  Red should be running Anger of the Gods, Lightning Strike, Mizzium Mortars and things of the like.  Additionally Dreadbores are nice to have too. You'll likely want higher end threats to be things like Desecration Demon, Sire of Insanity, Underworld Cerberus, and the like.  (Side note, Abhorrent Overlord works beautifully with Whip of Erebos).  Outside of these threats, you're going to want a LOT more removal, most importantly being Anger of the Gods, which will let you clear out the opponent's board quite frequently.

Without delving into specific cards too much, I would suggest figuring out which way you would like to run with the deck, then identify the cards that are critical to your strategy.  Then you ideally want to pick up multiples of those cards and run most of them as 3-4 ofs, as opposed to only having one copy of a card in the deck.  The idea here is to increase consistency across games, making the deck more reliable and more competitive.

All of that being said, if the LGS is super competitive, I would actually suggest trying another LGS and finding somewhere laid back, as the shops where people are dedicated to Grand Prix and Pro-Tour style events will typically have a TON of net-deckers and really just aren't as much fun until you're more skilled.

Remember, the biggest part is to have fun.  I hope some of this helped.

Here is the deck that is being referenced.

http://deckbox.org/sets/496737

GR33NJ3RK, please remember to link to the deck in question so that people know what you're referring to.

More pointedly, the deck is clearly for standard play not for modern (trust me as you'll get blown out playing modern with this deck).  That being said, you REALLY need to focus more on having 3 and 4x of the cards you're really wanting if you hope to be competitive.

Perhaps if you could detail more about the setting you're playing in, budget you're looking to spend, and how you expect the deck to perform in an ideal scenario, then we might be able to provide more useful insight.  Remember, the more information you give the community, the more likely we can give meaningful feedback.

From the look of the current build you're straying from the aggro again... Mistcutter Hydra can work as a SB card, but so can Voice (and having the Voice count at 2x saves you the trouble of picking up 2x more $40 cards).  Don't even worry about Elspeth as she's too high for the curve you're shooting for.  The same can be said for Collective Blessing.

Your best bet anthem will be Path of Bravery - consider the synergy with the angel... attacking gains life and more pumps for the entire team...  It's also WAY cheaper to cast and easier to hit the colored mana requirements.

But again, you're going to want to max out Dryad Militant and/or Soldier of the Pantheon as 4-ofs - as you want to put the pressure on early and keep it on until they're finished off.

I most certainly understand the whole appeal of Voice, but if you're playing aggro, that means putting as much pressure on the opponent as possible as quickly as possible.  As such, if I had to choose between a 3/3 centaur or a 2/2 voice for two mana... well... one has more power than the other.  You definitely keep them SB so that you're able to slide them in against control, but if you're playing honest-to-god aggro, you will want Militants and Soldier of the Pantheon more.

This will be competitive as currently constructed, but if you want to be up there with the tier 1 decks, you really have to go all in behind your strategy and not hedge at all.

They're pretty good... but now you have to refine your game to know when to put everything on the board and pressure the opponent and when to turn it back a bit and play around things like Supreme Verdict.

To that end, I would actually suggest trying to find room to run 2x Hammer of Purphoros.