ZombieSleeve wrote:
sebi wrote:
ZombieSleeve wrote:

What I mean by that is if I have 3 copies of Lannowar Elves (M12, NM) and 1 Llanowar Elves (M12, LP) I can tag the LP copy or all 3 NM copies, but would not be able to tag just one of the NM copies.

You can! If you split the 3NM row, add one tag on the split one, another tag on the 2 remaining, it will work, they will stay "separate".

How would you split a row from inventory?  That functionality only works in the deckbuilding screen as far as I'm aware.


Also just a small bump on this.  If you can describe how to do the split, that would be awesome.

ZombieSleeve wrote:

I saw something similar with another card. Burnished Hart Retro #71.  IT was in a trade but my qty available seemed wrong.  So after confirming it was incorrect I went into editions and added 1, so my total qty now was 2, 1 available for trade.

I pulled up the page for that printing and it still only shows 1 copy and 1 for trade even though that does not match the edition page.  I reloaded multiple times to confirm.

This seems to also be resolved, partially.  If I change my inentory in Editions it does show when reloading the card page, however I tested Avon's reported bug and could replicate. 

So this is definitely unrelated to whatever fixed the issue I reported.

sebi wrote:
ZombieSleeve wrote:

I had a trade where the printing the other trader wanted was listed wrong, so I went into my inventory and changed it to be the correct one

I (partly) fixed the interaction now. If you change the printing or details in your inventory for something in a trade, now the entry in the trade will be "disconnected", so you will see the old version, and with "0" counts for inventory to show that is what you added initially, but you don't have it anymore.

You can fix it by clicking the inventory count and setting a 0 to the old row, and the new count on the new details.

Does that make sense?

Tested and it worked removing from inventory.  It also works if something was added to a trade not available, and the setting of qtty available changes on the card page it updates the trade.  This is now working as expected.  Cheers!

79

(34 replies, posted in Announcements)

sebi wrote:
Avon wrote:

Bummer. Will you be communicating dates for removal of Marketplace features? Two things I'm wondering are when my final chance to export my card prices will be and when the final bill will be posted for Deckbox fees. Will Marketplace feedback be erased?

The prices will not be removed in the foreseeable feature, even after buying and selling will be disabled, so no rush to export anything. Seller feedback will not be erased.

I will try to get official tcgplayer prices for USD and cardmarket prices for EUR. After removal of the marketplace I will contact them and try to get the prices and to have a closer integration with other marketplaces (in an ideal world one would be able to directly sync his inventory between them).

The would probably be very open to sharing their API and possibly even giving you referal payments if you put a "Buy it on TCG / Cardmarket" link on every printing page.  This was if people are looking for a trade, and can't find a partner for it they have instant access to purchase. Plus, knowing you get a bit of money on each sale, I'd definitely use your referal link.

On a more important note: I think a few bugs may be present.

I had a trade where the printing the other trader wanted was listed wrong, so I went into my inventory and changed it to be the correct one

- Captain N'ghathrod 646 was listed as having 1 for trade
- went in inventory and changed that printing to Captain N'ghathrod 640

That should now say I have an unavailable item in the trade but it did not.  It still said I was trading him a 646, even though none were available.

I reloaded the page, still there.  I tried using the quick qty. switch on the trade page and it did not show 640 was in my inventory on that screen.

I went to add 640, and it turned the 646 into trading 2 copies.

I was only able to resolve by removing 646 completely and adding new the 640.


I saw something similar with another card. Burnished Hart Retro #71.  IT was in a trade but my qty available seemed wrong.  So after confirming it was incorrect I went into editions and added 1, so my total qty now was 2, 1 available for trade.

I pulled up the page for that printing and it still only shows 1 copy and 1 for trade even though that does not match the edition page.  I reloaded multiple times to confirm.

sebi wrote:
ZombieSleeve wrote:

What I mean by that is if I have 3 copies of Lannowar Elves (M12, NM) and 1 Llanowar Elves (M12, LP) I can tag the LP copy or all 3 NM copies, but would not be able to tag just one of the NM copies.

You can! If you split the 3NM row, add one tag on the split one, another tag on the 2 remaining, it will work, they will stay "separate".

How would you split a row from inventory?  That functionality only works in the deckbuilding screen as far as I'm aware.

So excited to see this big enhancement being rolled out Sebi.

Did a little testing and have some questions/thoughts:

1. If I'm understanding this correctly, the tag works on a specific instance of a card, but not specific cards - What I mean by that is if I have 3 copies of Lannowar Elves (M12, NM) and 1 Llanowar Elves (M12, LP) I can tag the LP copy or all 3 NM copies, but would not be able to tag just one of the NM copies.

One of the things I was looking forward to with this is using it to define where cards are located, so tagging my singletons from each set into that set binder, and the stuff in the Trade Binder as in that location.  If I have more than 1 printing of a card with all the same attributes that seems like it will not be possible here at this time, right?

Could it be possible, where, like in the deckbuilding area, you could split a line for a card that has multiple copies and tag only one or some? So the result of what I shared above would be I would have one copy of Llanowar Elves (M12, NM, M12 Binder), two copies of Lannowar Elves (M12, NM), and 1 Llanowar Elves (M12, LP)

2. Seeing Tags in other places - Do you plan to make tags visible in built decks, so I can see where they came from and where they go back to? Can we see it in trades? This would be especially helpful for those of us with multiple trade boxes. And in the Card Printing page, in the "In your decks" section it would be great if we could see and edit the tags.  This would sort the request I previously asked for of being able to move cards from one location to another from that screen.

83

(34 replies, posted in Announcements)

Sebi, thanks for your transparency and for continuing to make a great platform here. Hopefully, the time you have to focus on the trading platform will allow you to release more premium features that will encourage regular users to step up for some expanded features and help fund your work on the platform.

ZombieSleeve wrote:
dexpired wrote:

Also, Mountain Goat is missing smile
https://scryfall.com/card/sld/737/mountain-goat

Mountain Goat and Gaea's Blessing https://scryfall.com/card/sld/735/gaeas-blessing are both secret cards from the new SL not sure if anyone opened any other ones, but the rest of mine were listed.

Missed Grima Wormtongue, from the secret lair, as well. : https://scryfall.com/card/sld/734/gr%C3%ADma-wormtongue

dexpired wrote:

Also, Mountain Goat is missing smile
https://scryfall.com/card/sld/737/mountain-goat

Mountain Goat and Gaea's Blessing https://scryfall.com/card/sld/735/gaeas-blessing are both secret cards from the new SL not sure if anyone opened any other ones, but the rest of mine were listed.

Hey there,

I think putting together two limits that are similar but kind of contradictory:

Color - Exclusively one of colorless
Number of Colors - Equals 1

This sounds like is both colorless and also of a color (number equals 1)

Perhaps a better point of where this is weird:

Number of colors = 0 - 193 Results
Color = All of Colorless - 227 Results

I could not find consistency in why is one and not the other:
Argivian Avenger
Clown Extruder
Ent-Draught Basin

So while I don't have an answer, I think removing the stacked criteria might help diagnose

87

(5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Sightburner wrote:
ZombieSleeve wrote:

Thanks for reading my recommendation and your feedback Sightburner!

In This Thread I proposed a solution here that takes care of part of the issue you may be experiencing - as long as you mostly get trades from your wants list. This solution would cover you as it would flag the second trade your want was in after you accept the first, as the card would no longer be in your want list.

That said, per your feedback, another symbol (maybe just a = ) says this exact item is in another incoming trade. Then it would be on the trader to know if it's the multiple copies they want, or about to be copy 2 they didn't need...

   My pleasure, ZS! I love this site, so I'm all on board with offering what I can to make it better.
The other thread you posted does offer some solutions on the trade screen, but I'm more pointing toward the profile screen.
For example: I sign on, click 'Interesting cards for trade', and I get a list of cards from my wants list that were recently posted. So I click the profile of the user holding said card.
On their profile, it lists all cards on my wants list that the user has in their tradelist, as well as what I have that matches theirs (Image attached).
THIS is where I'd love to see the 'already in other trades' symbol, so I don't duplicate, double trade, or drive other traders crazy with having to adjust trades in progress because I inadvertently already got a card we were discussing.

Again, a lot of this could be avoided just with some extra care on my part, but this is a feature that would help me personally- I can't imagine I'm alone in this lol. Just a suggestion.

~S~

Got ya! And I love it.  The more data we all have in all the places the less frustration and honestly more trades we'll all get.  Thanks for the additional idea, I hope it's also considered!

Also the image you uploaded didn't work. The easiest way i found is to go to imgur or another service that will le tyou upload an image and give you a directlink URL - one that looks like:

www.website.com/imagename.png

Then paste that link here select the text and click the image button above in the tools.  it will end up looking like:

[img]www.website.com/imagename.png[/img]

88

(5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Sightburner wrote:

This is a little different from what ZombieSleeve is proposing, but falls under the same umbrella, so please forgive my not making a new thread.

I'd personally love to see the 'In other trades' tag when I'm looking at someone's profile (not just in the actual trade screen), and the list of 'haves' they have that correlate to my 'wants'. I've opened multiple trades for the same card before, and have on more than one occasion ended up with more copies of said card than I needed because I missed that it was on multiple trades.

Again, it's something that could be avoided with more diligence on my end, but I think it'd be a huge help.

Thanks for reading my recommendation and your feedback Sightburner!

In This Thread I proposed a solution here that takes care of part of the issue you may be experiencing - as long as you mostly get trades from your wants list. This solution would cover you as it would flag the second trade your want was in after you accept the first, as the card would no longer be in your want list.

That said, per your feedback, another symbol (maybe just a = ) says this exact item is in another incoming trade. Then it would be on the trader to know if it's the multiple copies they want, or about to be copy 2 they didn't need...

When working on a trade with a partner and going back and forth to get the trade where both parties are happy, often small changes are done - removing a single card or swapping a printing/version.  In larger trades, this is almost impossible to detect what was changed.

After User A submits a trade, anything new or changed (Qty. / Set / Condition) is somehow highlighted if User B counters.  This state only needs to be visible until any change is applied by User A.  The system will have to combine multiple changes if User B makes separate proposed changes since the last time User A logged into the trade.

I don't know if it's feasible to do this with changes alone, but at a minimum, this seems feasible when changes are locked with a proposed trade offer.

When working through many trades simultaneously, someone will often propose trade items that were a want when they created the trade, but have since been accepted in another trade and are no longer needed.

I also occasionally have people propose, out of the blue, a card to trade that I do not have on my want list.

In both cases, I want to know that the item is not something I explicitly asked for, so I can more easily determine whether it should stay in the trade.  This is only really relevant before a trade is confirmed, as in many cases after it's confirmed, the item should no longer be in the want list.

This could be implemented as easily as having the color block for the # in the incoming card row to be a different color similar to how it looks when none are available.  Instead of red, it could be yellow or orange (take caution this may not be needed)

91

(5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

The addition of "In other trades" has been a big help, especially when managing many trades simultaneously.

I propose an improvement for it, though, that would significantly reduce the time needed to click on and load the specific card page and then the [more info] button.

Here's an example from a recent trade.  These are not all the same type of in other trade - some are similar card n outbound trades, and some are in pending trades.  for each, I have to go to the card and click a button to see if it matters or not:
https://jmp.sh/EfA2UHff+/Screen+Shot+2023-08-18+at+12.07.07+PM.png

I propose that instead of a single Green <-> why not just use four different arrows:

Outgoing Accepted: <- Green.  This item has been removed from your trade list anyway, so if you see this in another trade, it's a different, available copy.

Incoming Accepted: -> Green.  This item is already coming to you, so you hopefully wanted two copies. Ideally, we would have another symbol or way of identifying if something is Actively in your Wishlist still.  It's perfectly fine to add stuff to a trade outside the wants list, but it would be great if we could see something marking if something in a trade is in our want list or not.

Outgoing Editable: <- Grey. 

Incoming Editable: -> Grey.

Hopefully, both of these are self-explanatory.  Knowing that a card I want in a trade is in another outgoing editable trade tells me I'm trading out a different copy than I'm looking for in this trade.  So there's no conflict.

It would be ideal if all four of these symbols opened the modal for the "In other trade" detail so it's easy to confirm which copy is going where.
https://jmp.sh/c7jkM8pD+/Screen+Shot+2023-08-18+at+12.19.53+PM.png

92

(0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

Can we please get a way to sort trade lists and, importantly on trade pages themselves?

I have over 2k cards on my want list and 7k cards on my trade list.  When I'm putting in a trade, especially a large one, I want to be able to focus on specific cards available by my trading partners first.

Here's an example where this person has over 150 cards across 7 pages I need to browse through first before I even start putting together the trade:
https://jmp.sh/Js3kSJlY+/Screen+Shot+2023-08-18+at+11.34.45+AM.png

I would really like to be able to sort these by Set and Price at a minimum.  Optimally, I could also have advanced filters just like we do on our Inventory and Wants.  Additionally, I see really good use of the "In other trades icon" here so we do not have to add items to our trade to see if it's already in other trades.

Once a trade is initiated, and especially approved, we should be able to sort the data.  This especially important when pulling cards. I think it fair to assume that most people have their collections sorted by set, not all card alphabetically, so locking it to Alphabetically makes pulling cards incredibly difficult.

In this example, My trade partner and I had about 200 cards each from dozens of sets:
https://jmp.sh/cn2mi7Kx+/GIF+Recording+2023-08-18+at+11.49.12+AM.gif

Shout out to Cheesewiz for the epic trade!

The technique I am forced to use is to start at the top and do all of the cards from the first set I hit, then once all of that set is pulled, move to the next unpulled card and repeat.  This is exhausting work because you have to remember what sets were pulled, and when you're done, you have to order everything back alphabetically to figure out the one card you missed... Please, at a minimum, allow for sorting by Set.

When the new functionality for storing locations is added, sort by location, then sort by set or alpha would be ideal.  This would allow users to know which trade box/binder to go to and then where to find it in the location depending on how they sort their collection.

Thank you for all you do to improve this platform Sebi.  Your work on this site is greatly appreciated.

93

(4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)

OMG!!!!

Finally! This has been a want forever!

I cannot wait to see this in practice Sebi.

94

(0 replies, posted in Set Collectors)

Hey all,

I am looking to complete as much of the set as possible while prices are still at a post-release dip.

Here are my wants:
https://deckbox.org/sets/1462937?f=c377 … =m&o=d

And my filtered haves:
https://deckbox.org/sets/1462936?f=c3775.772


Would love to get a big trade in to get this set complete.  Prefer to trade like for like values where possible (mainly avoiding one $30 card for 60 $0.50 ones...)
Of course, I'm happy to trade from the rest of my binder for stuff as well.

95

(1 replies, posted in Set Collectors)

Just Got a chance to open my boxes and got some solid hits!
- Foil Ragavans - Multiple!
- Rainbow Foil Elesh Norn
- Foil Wren & Realbreaker Alt-Art
Here' my Trades
And my Wants

Both lists are $3 or greater, but I'm happy to trade as big as possible to complete the non-foil collection for this set.

If you haven't opened boxes yet, but plan too, good luck on your pulls!

96

(1 replies, posted in Set Collectors)

March of the Machine (MOM)
Released: April 21, 2023

March of the Machine contains 281 regular cards (116 commons, 80 uncommons, 60 rares, 20 mythic rares, 5 basic lands), furthermore there are 10 Phyrexian Full Art basic lands (#282-291). Different showcase-style (depending on the plane of origin) cards are #292-319. Borderless planeswalkers are #320-322. Standard legal Jumpstart cards are #323-337. Alternate art borderless praetor/sagas are #338-342. Extended artwork cards are numbered #343-380. The dark frame treatment cards from the Universal promo pack are numbered #381-385, the Bundle promo is #386, and the Buy-a-Box card is #387.

MTG Fandom

March of the Machine - Multiverse Legends (MUL)
Released: April 21, 2023

Multiverse Legends...[contains] 65 (20 uncommons, 30 rares, 15 mythic rares) of the most famous iconic characters in their home planes' Booster Fun treatment and with set code MUL.

MTG Fandom

March of the Machine - Commander (MOC)
Released: April 21, 2023

March of the Machine Commander cards with the expansion code MOC and numbered #1–79 (and their alternate versions numbered #80–138) are permitted in the Commander, Legacy, and Vintage formats. Returning cards with the expansion code MOC and numbered 139–444 are legal for play in any format that already allows those cards.

A special set of cards with the MOC set code can only be found in Set Boosters, Collector Boosters (#72-79 / #80-87) and as prerelease promos in Prerelease Packs (#445-447 / #448-450). They aren't found in the March of the Machine commander decks. These are only are permitted in the Commander, Legacy, and Vintage formats.

As a special feature, these Commander decks feature Planechase cards (#47-71, #139-163).[2] Each deck has 5 new Plane cards, 4 reprint Plane cards and 1 reprint Phenomenon.

MTG Fandom

97

(0 replies, posted in Set Collectors)

MOM Collector's List

This took a lot longer than I had hoped - like 3 hours to pull together from all the various places, and we still need a clear picture of a bunch of the spoiled cards.

What are you looking to get from this set?

Changes to your collection plans for it?

Here's everything I could find for MOM - Please comment if I missed anything or got it incorect.
@Sebi - hopefully this can help for planning

MOM - March of the Machines- Target Date for Upload
Release Date: 14 April 2023
Includes:

MUL Multiverse Legends Set - Target Date for Upload
Includes:

MOM Pre-Release - Target Date for Upload
Includes

MOM Art Cards - 81 Non-Foils Art Cards
- Target Date for Upload

MOM Tokens and Extras - 16 Non-Foils Tokens - Target Date for Upload

MOM The List Additions - 75 Non-Foils - Target Date for Upload

-------------------------------------

MOC March of the Machines Commander- Target Date for Upload
Release Date: 14 April 2023
Includes:

MOC Tokens and Extras - Appox 14 Tokens - Target Date for Upload

A couple new store champion promos seem to be missing.

These are the 2023 list so far:
- https://scryfall.com/card/sch/7/annex-sentry
- https://scryfall.com/card/sch/8/memory-deluge
- https://scryfall.com/card/sch/9/koth-fire-of-resistance

100

(2 replies, posted in Set Collectors)

I also started my trade stock with just cards I had collected over time - recently though, I started buying Collector's boxes - then I use any foils opened in there for trades for the non-foils from that set.  There's plenty of people looking for the hot new shiny, so this generally gets me better card return on my set wants then anything else.  I try to strike right after the sets are cracked as that's when the foil demand and price is highest.