Hello,
We're adding signed and altered as card options for our next update.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "so many extra languages that need to be options".
2,301 2012-04-12 17:20:24
Re: Inventory has several field options missing: languages & properties (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
2,302 2012-04-12 17:18:54
Re: Suggestions (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Souel is referring to the fact that he might have one deck that is just a deck idea, and does not represent an actual built deck. So he'd like to mark it somehow, so that cards inside it do not count toward the "Total in decks" figure.
I think this has been requested before as well, under various forms. We'd definitely want to add it, as it's a good idea, and has various other applications as well (aside from a more correct 'total in decks' count).
Your other 2 suggestions are already in development. 
2,303 2012-04-10 10:33:42
Re: Problem with Community (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Sure. Please send an email to support@deckbox.org, with links to your community, and to the people that are in the community but you cannot see as members. We'll check it out.
2,304 2012-04-10 10:32:15
Re: Some cards images don't appear correctly... (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Virgo wrote:
How are things going?
Going great! 
2,305 2012-04-10 10:31:50
Re: Incorrect Feedback score left (28 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Zargathe wrote:
Well, I just did something dumb — I just completed a trade with user fluke2097, and when I attempted to respond him letting me know that he got the cards, I subconsciously decided the feedback explanation text input box was the appropriate place for a chat message. I did manage to get the feedback score right, though…. Is there any way you could fix this? I left the would-have-been-feedback message in the chat box, just in case, but if not, then the gist of the message is in there anyway. I'm sorry for making your life more difficult, and I'm sorry to fluke2097 for messing up your feedback message, and thank you Sebi for running an awesome site!
PS everyone trade with fluke2097 — best trader ever.
No worries, we fixed it. Should be fine now like this, right? http://deckbox.org/trades/9035?s=11381
2,306 2012-04-10 10:28:22
Re: Inventory missing promo Archenemy Schemes/Planechase Planes (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Thanks for reporting, we'll import.
2,307 2012-04-10 10:27:09
Re: Another possible feature (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
This is a good idea, we'll do it. (You can sort of see this now as well, if you mouseover the little icon next to a user's login on their profile as seen in the screenshot attached. It's very obscure and hidden though, so we'll put it somewhere more visible.)
2,308 2012-04-08 14:26:48
Re: Trouble entering card "Maro" (2 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
This is a known bug, we'll try to fix it soon .
In the mean time, to add it, type Maro, then press escape to dismiss the autocompleted menu, and then enter (or the add button).
2,309 2012-04-08 10:13:41
Re: Mass import (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hey, thanks for the feedback. This is definitely something we want to implement soon.
2,310 2012-04-08 10:13:10
Re: Incorrect Feedback score left (28 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Done!
2,311 2012-04-06 09:43:25
Re: Trading Opportunities Update ETA? (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello. We don't have an ETA to annouce for this yet. There is a bunch of things that we are finishing and we need to deploy during this month, and it will come after that.
2,312 2012-04-06 09:42:28
Re: Feature Request: Secondary Filter (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Thanks for reporting, it's definitely a bug. Will fix.
2,313 2012-04-03 19:31:43
Re: What's the character limit on leaving a feedback? (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Tawnos wrote:
I believe it's 254 characters.
Precisely.
We wanted to keep in line with other auction website feedback styles (see ebay).
2,314 2012-04-03 19:30:06
Re: New Feature Id love to see and even be willing to pay for. (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
This would be indeed a very cool feature. We actually know some people (you know who you are ) who wanted to try to implement something like this for Android phones. We'll poke them some more 
(Also, if anyone else on the forum has successfully tried something similar (image recognition of mtg cards), definitely we would like to hear from you by email.)
2,315 2012-03-31 12:48:13
Re: WHI - separate loyalty from cost column (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I see. We'll take a look at that
2,316 2012-03-31 10:03:24
Re: bad trader (1 replies, posted in Reddit MTG Trades)
Hey guys. I've moved and merged the discussion into the Site Feedback section for more visibility. Please continue the discussion there. There are many great ideas in this thread, keep them coming!
Our current feeling on this issue is summarized in my latest post in the thread: http://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=14268#p14268
2,317 2012-03-31 10:01:42
Re: [Feature discussion] Trade score. Feedback and disputes. (61 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hello everybody.
The last 2 pages in this thread have been a discussion amongst the guys on the reddit mtg trades community. Since it contains many nice ideas, I have moved it here for more visibility.
Our feeling on the matter is that indeed we need more features to enhance the feedback system. The ones that we DEFINITELY want to implement, and you can expect at some point during the month of april are:
We want user feedback to really matter. Feedback score will be more prominently displayed everywhere a username is displayed (like the score of an ebay user). Detailed feedback listing will be present on users profiles.
A report button will be provided, so people can report untrustworthy users to our support address. We will look into the reports, and will flag users that ignore our requests for comment. (like: http://deckbox.org/users/GreyCr0ss as discussed here earlier in this thread)
Canceling a trade after it has been accepted by both parties will have a feedback score that matters to your total score.
People's addresses and personal information will NOT be published anywhere, as it would be a breach of privacy. BUT we will implement a system where we are notified when a user sets a suspicious address. (A suspicious address would be one already used by a banned account, or very similar).
The current trade help page http://deckbox.org/help/trade will be clearer and more detailed, to have more info on all these issues
As a final note, we will handle serious feedback support requests for cases of fraud, where people ignore other user's emails and so on. These are cases that result in a ban or an untrustworthy flag. We will NOT moderate incorrect feedback support requests. If a trade goes through, and both people receive cards but one user gets a -1 when he was supposed to get +1, that's not a serious problem. The feedback system should be self regulating in these cases. This works for eBay and many other feedback powered systems, so it should work for us too
We're looking forward hear your feedback on these issues.
2,318 2012-03-30 20:17:45
Re: Upcoming features (150 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Sundodger wrote:
I second this, the most (really only) annoying thing for me is to have the price of all my foils listed at their non foil price, or have all versions for which I have multiple editions of a card listed at the same price.
Another nitpicky thing: I use the export feature so I can use this list on other trading forums, and for my foreign cards, I'd prefer to have it output 'Japanese' or 'Chinese' in English rather than those words written in their respective languages. Maybe have an option to have everything output in whatever language the user speaks?
That said, great work, I've been looking for a tool like this for a while, and I can't wait to see the mobile version
The price-per-edition we're currently fixing, should be ready in the next few weeks, card valuation should be considerably easier and better. Sadly we don't have prices for foils separately from tcgplayer, so foils will be still listed at the same price as non-foils for the time being. We have ideas for fixing that but it will take some time...
The language observation is good, and we shall change language names to english.
2,319 2012-03-30 20:14:31
Re: 2 errors with pricing (6 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
mholger wrote:
EDIT: Meh; I suspect deckbox probably just has access to TCGPlayer's low/avg/high prices, and doesn't do any calculations on its own, so this is probably entirely moot. Oh well...
Exactly right.
We're in the process of using prices per edition for cards that have details on them, and revamping the inventory listing for that purpose. It should help with card valuation a bit.
2,320 2012-03-30 20:10:41
Re: Incorrect Feedback score left (28 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
danpascooch wrote:
I messed up too, could you please change my feedback earlier today with Natedizzle from 0 to +1
Somehow the page refreshed halfway through my giving feedback, don't ask me how.
Done.
2,321 2012-03-30 20:08:05
Re: Filters and generating trade lists (4 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Both are very good ideas for filters, note taken!
2,322 2012-03-30 20:03:30
Re: A few Bugs (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Hey, thanks for reporting the issues. We'll check them out. The inventory addition system is changing with the next update, so your issues should be fixed!
2,323 2012-03-30 20:01:30
Re: Database and card scans STATUS (230 replies, posted in Warhammer Invasion)
Gardinethereal wrote:
Thanks for your priceless work.
I just wanted to report Planning For War has a wrong rulestext, that you put next to the card (its the text from Recruiting for War) .
Planning for war rules text is now fixed, thanks for reporting.
2,324 2012-03-27 18:33:16
Re: Incorrect Feedback score left (28 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
rfioren wrote:
I just did the same by accident on my trade with preypacer. Can I please get that set to +1? Thanks and sorry!
Done!
2,325 2012-03-27 18:18:55
Re: [Feature discussion] Trade score. Feedback and disputes. (61 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
marumari wrote:
In the interim, before there is any updates to the feedback system, would it be possible to get:
http://deckbox.org/users/GreyCr0ss... marked as untrustworthy, so others don't get suckered into trades with him?
He never sent cards in this trade:
http://deckbox.org/trades/5235?s=7927Despite multiple times sending messages on deckbox, as well as sending him messages on reddit and through email. I don't want to cancel the trade (since I sent my cards), and I don't want to click that I received them (because that doesn't do anything unless he also does that, and, well, because I didn't receive them.)
If this was supposed to go to support@deckbox.org instead, my apologies! Feel free to delete the post, in that case.
He has ignored our messages as well. His account is as of now marked as an untrustworthy trader.
http://deckbox.org/users/GreyCr0ss
If you have no hopes of finishing the trades you have with him, cancel them and leave a negative feedback. This feedback will (after our next update) count towards his general score.