Search options (Page 10 of 11)

I believe the process of importing the prices to Deckbox.org is a manual one for.  They usually have everything in place within two weeks of launch which is still a handful of days away.  Patience is a virtue

Mono Black Infect has been a pretty solid build in recent times.  Here is a link to a decent version; http://deckbox.org/sets/98411.  I like most of this build but would make the following changes:
-2 Nihil Spellbomb
-2 Phyrexian Vatmother
-1 Distress
-2 Contagion Clasp

+3 Whispering Specter
+2 Trigon of Rage
+2 Contagion Engine

Mainly these changes are to enhance the decks agressive capabilities.  Phyrexian Vatmother looks good on paper but it doesn't fly so it just gets blocked all the time.  Also, popping the Whispering Specter to clear out your opponents hand is the win in many cases.  The Contagion Engine for Contagion Clasp swap brings mass removal and double proliferate to the deck while lightening the crowded 2-mana slot. 

If you were looking to stay closer to your current build then I would at least recommend the following changes:

-4 Plague Myr
-4 Reaper of Sheoldred
-4 Mana Leak
-2 Steady Progress
-1 Grimoire of the Dead
-1 Venser's Journal
-1 Dissipation Field
-1 Nephalia Drownyard
-1 Swamp

+2 Blighted Agent
+2 Plague Stinger
+2 Corrupted Resolve
+4 Thrummingbird
+2 Contagion Engine
+4 Silver-inlaid Dagger
+3 Island

The changes are meant to focus the deck on the fast beatdown strategy and increase the amount of evasion in the deck to 13 sources (up from 5).  The equipment will make the evasion all the more deadly and help provide a respectable clock.  Most of the cards are already in your inventory save a few that will be easy to acquire if you choose to go this route.  Lastly, I didn't add it because they are expensive but if you can get you hands on Inkmoth Nexus', Drowned Catacombs or Darkslick Shores it would help the deck quite a bit.

This site gets its card database directly from the Wizards of the Coast database, Gatherer.  Gatherer does not distinguish between "Portal" and "Portal Demogame"; perhaps because the lines are a little grey as to whether Portal Demogame is an official edition/set or just a pre-made package.  I am pretty sure it's the latter based on the description at StarCityGames where it states that it is a pack of cards from the "Portal" edition. 

If it were me, I would just treat the cards as though they are from Portal as there is little difference and I would rather organize my cards the way WoTC does.  The exact same logic applies to the coldsnap preconstructed decks. 

For whatever reason, WoTC treats some preconstructed decks as sets and others not.

I couldn't say whether deckbox.org intends to incorporate these missing categories or not but my guess is that they will continue to organize cards in the same way Gatherer does.

Under the assumption that this deck is meant to make the best use of Charmbreaker Devils and Burning Vengeance I would recommend the following.

Remove:
2 Fortress Crab
1 Into the Maw of Hell
1 Pitchburn Devils

Add:
2 Lightning Bolt
1 Sturmgeist (it looks like you have a second one available, if not you can use Flame Slash)
1 Fireball

Given that you don't have enough of the right cards here to play a really focused strategy I think your best odds are to use your burn and bounce spells to keep the battlefield clear.  Then you can swing in with Murder of Crows, Sturmgeist, Scourge of Geier Reach and Charmbreaker Devils.

deckbox.org gets its card information through a 3rd party (tcgplayer.com) and as such does not have finite control over which image is displayed.  I *heard* (e.g. I have no idea if it's true) that there is an API update coming out from the 3rd party that may address this concern.

If it makes you feel any better, I'd like to see the correct images too!

I can't say I agree with your reasoning there.  Turn 5 wins seem pretty reasonable with this deck and it is incredibly consistent with a good amount of control and evasion.  It's not exactly my choice for decks I would like to play but it sure looks powerful and fast to me. 

I don't want to get too far off track though.  If you want to re-tool a U/B infect deck then let's do that

I would maybe start another thread but that's up to you.

I feel bad because I am going to shred this deck.  But, hopefully, you'll see my reasoning and appreciate U/B Zombie mill from another perspective

First off, I LOVE this deck concept.  I am completely enamored with Undead Alchemist and Endless Ranks of the Dead.  Wow, I would not be across the table from that!

So, looking at your deck I see some things that concern me.  First of them is Endless Ranks of the Dead; it creatures zombies during your upkeep based on the number of zombies you have in play rounded down.  That's an important distinction because you only have 8 zombie cards in the entire deck.  All other zombies you can create have conditions that you aren't always going to be able to meet (e.g. having other zombies already or your opponents having creature cards on the bottom of their library). 

If I were your opponent I would let you cast all the Endless Ranks of the Dead you wanted and just kill the handful of zombie creatures you cast.  You'd probably have a rough time putting together a legitimate threat in that case.

My recommendation is that you drop Deranged Assistant, Onyx Mage and Vault Skirge for zombies to help the cause.

My next concern are the ancillary cards like Runic Repetition , Grasp of Phantoms and Graveyard Shovel.  They don't have any real synergy with your two win conditions which is either "Zombie Mill" (Undead Alchemist and some zombies) or "So many Zombees!" (Endless Ranks of the Dead without Alchemist). 

So, here is a link to all the U/B zombie cards in Standard right now.  http://deckbox.org/games/mtg/cards?f=47 … !b31!793.2

From that list I like Stitched Drake and Cemetery Reaper for your build.  The reaper works very well with all of your strategies; the drake is a little concerning because it needs to be "fed" and you might not always have something to feed it.  Maybe more on that later...

I also like Gravedigger, Geth, Lord of the Vault and Skinrender for the deck. 

Lastly I would like to see the deck get some draw along with a way to feed the Gravedigger and/or Stitched Drake so I think you shoudl run a full compliment of Forbidden Alchemy.

So, the final list could look something like this.  http://deckbox.org/sets/100944

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on my suggestions.

That's fair; I don't really want you to build a blue-black deck.  It would, technically, be blue-black because of the inclusion of Tezzeret's Gambit but you wouldn't have any blue mana.  You would just pay the 2 life and 3 colorless for it instead.  So, really, the deck would play as if it were mono-black.

If someone told you that those two cards combo because the tokens created by Phyrexian Swarmlord cause Hand of the Praetors to trigger and give your opponent more poison counters they are, with all due respect, incorrect.  Hand of the Praetors states that you must "cast" a spell with infect.  This includes declaring the spell, paying any casting costs (e.g. mana, life, etc.), and placing the spell on the stack to be potentially countered.  Phyrexian Swarmlord states that it simply "puts" tokens directly on to the battlefield.  They are not the same thing, unfortunately. 

Don't get me wrong, shelling out a bunch of 2/2 infect creatures every turn IS an awesome play; but it's not one that is so amazing that I would choose it over Contagion Engine in this deck. 

This is true but it will also get smaller and very quickly become useless.  I see your point that it will be be good in a very specific situation but I doubt that situation will arise as often as Contagion Engine would be helpful. 

You are very welcome.  I thank you, as well, for taking the time to explain your opinion on my suggestions.  In the end, you know your environment better than I do; maybe you play against a TON of deathtouch creatures and artifact destruction.  In those cases, perhaps your original build is the way to go.  In a diverse environment (meta-game if you will) it's far more likely that 3 Contagion Engine + 3 Tezzeret's Gambit will outplay 2 Phyrexian Swarmlord + 2 Phyrexian Hydra + 2 Disentomb. 

I was making fun of myself, speeling is "spelling" misspelled.

The green you've added isn't very strong and that leaves little incentive to add a second color to the mana base.  I would recommend dropping the green altogether. 
I would also drop the Disentombs as I think there are simply better cards.

With the extra space I would potentially add 3 Contagion Engines and 3 Tezzeret's Gambits.

The land count is a little light; I would run 1 or 2 more, dropping a Doom Blade or Go for the Throat to make room.  By that rationale, I would pick either Doom Blade or Go for the Throat and drop the other card entirely. 

Let us know if you make any of these changes and how they work!

EDIT: Speeling is not always my strong suit.

I don't personally mind OpenID but I think Sebi and Laura need to decide for themselves if it's the right move for the site.  It has implications that span well in to the future.

To combat the spammers without switching to OpenID I would recommend a multi-faceted approach if you agree with it.  You could add Captcha to the account creation page, set a limit to the number of e-mails per minute (or whatever time period) and add a link to all e-mail sent from this site that can report spammers.  If a specific account is reported enough times over a short enough amount of time (e.g. 10 times in 24 hours) then the account is banned or suspended pending review.  This impedes both human and robot spammers. 

The obvious risk to the aforementioned approach is that legitimate people with accounts ban other accounts just to be jerks.  Then you have to figure out how to combat this if it becomes a problem and you'll ultimately become the arbiter of a situation you probably don't want to be involved in   I suppose you could just ban the problem accounts here as well.

My sites always run better without all the users. 

I would also like to see this functionality.  I don't always want the world to see my brews but I would certainly like to have my friends take a look without the hassle of a password or arbitrarily setting it to "password1" or something else which can be easily guessed.