You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Deckbox Forum » Posts by sebi
* imported Time Spiral Remastered
* imported Historic Anthology 4 Arena set
* fixed shapeshifter token in Kaldheim being listed as the shapeshifter creature (yeah this keeps happening...)
* added Sylvan Ranger #70 to WPN
* fixed converted mana costs for Happy Holidays cards, they were messing up sorting and the graphs in decks
* added The Gitrog Monster and Nicol Bolas, the Ravager Judge promos
More stuff coming tomorrow - kaldheim art cards, some missing arena exclusives etc.
Historic:
Omnath, Locus of Creationis banned (from suspended).
Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrathis banned.
Pioneer:
Balustrade Spy is banned.
Teferi, Time Raveler is banned.
Undercity Informer is banned.
Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath is banned.
Wilderness Reclamation is banned.
Modern:
Field of the Dead is banned.
Mystic Sanctuary is banned.
Simian Spirit Guide is banned.
Tibalt's Trickery is banned.
Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath is banned.
Legacy:
Arcum's Astrolabe is banned.
Dreadhorde Arcanist is banned.
Oko, Thief of Crowns is banned.
Vintage:
Lurrus of the Dream-Den is unbanned.
* fixed some cards appearing not legal in Commander
* fixed prices not being displayed for Kaldheim Commander
* Imported "The List" 2021 cards
- imported Kaldheim Commander and the double sided tokens
https://deckbox.org/editions/603-extras … -commander
https://deckbox.org/editions/601-kaldheim-commander
- imported the list of Prerelease promos for Kaldheim
https://deckbox.org/editions/602-prerel … s-kaldheim
- fixed zendikar rising commander edition image (&extras), and rarity of Dimir Signet, Mind Stone
- fixed some extreme pricing problems with Alpha, Beta, Antiquities cards
- imported Kaldheim & Tokens (promos coming in the coming couple of days)
- Fall from Favor is now marked as banned in Pauper
- removed mis-imported Zombie token in Secret Lair Drops, and the corresponding double-faced token, replaced with proper Walker // Walker ones
- imported Topdeck the Halls Holiday card
- imported Clue // Wurm Double Masters token
- imported the walker double sided tokens for Secret Lair Drop Series
- imported many double sided Commander Legends tokens
Imported a couple missing sets and cards today, as per the title.
I think we're missing a lot of double-sided tokens for Commander Legends too, I see that tcgplayer has many listed, we only have 5 or so. Will look into that too tomorrow.
Underneath the trade listing on the page there should be a chat "window"/panel visible.
Should be again working now, right?
I think it would behave like the trades behave now, which is that it only "applies" changes to inventories/wishlists when accepted, not when proposed.
I like the idea, I often want to discuss conditions and verify quantities before purchasing, so it makes sense to have a way to communicate with the seller before paying. My only suggestion is that it should be the default for everyone, not opt-in
Communicating is already possible, there is a "discuss with seller" button that makes the order visible to the seller before it's completed and paid for, and can be discussed 
For the price issue, I am working on bringing back multiple pricing sources, cardmarket for EU folks, tcgplayer and card kingdom for USD prices.
No problem. It was admittedly a wall of text (an issue I tend to have.....).
And i'm reading things diagonally hoping my brain will focus on the important bits (an issue I tend to have... 
).
Will users be able to propose money trades to non-sellers, and when that other user tries to move forward with the trade, they'll be prompted to create the seller account? Or will users only be able to propose money trades to already established sellers?
I didn't think too much about the ui&flow yet, but just as an initial idea: you'd just make a trade as you can now, and at the bottom of the card list you can add an "Extra sum to be paid <sum><currency>", that can be edited by both parties as if it were an "extra card" or something like that. If the person that is to receive that sum wants to accept the trade and does not have a seller account he will first be offered a button to go create one before he can accept (or propose).
Pinging this thread too to say there's a new conversation going on in the latest thread in "Announcements", for whoever still receives notifications from this thread.
=MAX(.18,ROUND(S2*VLOOKUP(F2,{"Near Mint",1;"Good (Lightly Played)",0.95;"Played",0.9;"Heavily Played",0.7;"Poor",0.4},2,0),2))
Regarding this, I wanted to ask if the numbers are of your own preference, or something that is "standard" in the market? I already have a similar formula that is used when you open the "collection value", but I want to add a new optional column in general listings to show the "adjusted" price of a card based on the formula. The numbers I use now are slightly lower than yours: 0.85;0.7;0.5,0.25.
I had actually proposed that in the older post. But I think the big question that'll be on many people's mind is this: How will this interact with seller profiles?
Ah, sorry, missed it, seems I did not read all the posts attentively enough.
It would only require a seller account if you want to receive money. Whenever you stand to receive money from somewhere and you do not have an attached verified paypal account (into which the money would go), you will be prompted to create a "seller account".
Since the concept of the flow of propose-discuss-accept-finalize is actually closer to a trade than an order, perhaps an idea that would communicate this is a more acceptable form would be to fold this feature into trades instead of orders.
In this scenario the trades would be expanded such that:
- multiple prices will be shown for each card ("seller price", "market price", and I would like to add pricing in wishlists as well which would act like "buyer/buylist price")
- both parties can discuss as normal in a trade
- at the end of the trade, one party can "pay for the difference" in the trade, which would attach an order for the agreed upon amount
It sounds at first glance as possibly too complex and confusing especially at the beginning and for new users, but perhaps there is a nice U.I. solution to make it understandable and also flexible at the same time...
Thanks for the reminder about the previous thread, ic0n67. Posted link in OP now. (https://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=31267)
I have now posted in Announcements with a request for comment in regards to this topic: https://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=31339
Sorry for necro-ing this thread after all this time, but I have posted in Announcements with a request for comment in regards to this topic, so perhaps users who mostly just look in Site Feedback would be interested to contribute: https://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=31339
(Not least of all sleepingwolf, I'd love to hear your opinion; I appreciated your post and made a note of it in regards to this issue, although I did not have the time to try formulating a meaningful solution until now.)
There have been multiple issues lately (non-public, via support ticket) about buyers buying spiked cards, and sellers cancelling orders, and various such issues. Since the marketplace here is very low volume, there are basically mostly users that sell cards, not professional stores. The difference between these is also remarked upon in feedback from users, such as these older posts:
https://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php … 95#p122495
https://deckbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=31267
I have been thinking lately that perhaps it is a good idea to acknowledge this distinction and finally provide an option for seller to not "auto-accept" orders. This would mean orders to them would behave like a trade. A buyer would open one, and then propose it, discuss it, and when the seller also accepts, payment could be made. Like a normal trade.
What do you guys think, would you (if you are a seller) be interested in having that option on, or as a buyer, would such an option be problematic / annoying to you? (As sleepingwolf mentions in his older feedback post, the current system is also annoying since sellers are forced to cancel and refund orders)
Unrelated, fixes deployed today:
* imported missing Commander Legends tokens & double-faced tokens
* imported missing Zendikar Rising Commander double-faced tokens
* fixed the Shapeshifter token in Double Masters getting bunched up with the shapeshifter creature (this always happens)
* imported 9 missing 2019/2020 Japanese magazine media insert promos (to Media Inserts edition)
* fixed mythic rarity edition symbol for Commander Legends
* imported 10 missing double masters double-faced tokens
* removed 5 extended art cards from Zendikar Rising Prerelease, that do not exist in reality
* fixed sort order for warhammer invasion "by edition" to use collectors_number as secondary criteria
Thank you for all that you do sebi
Have you been able to find the extras (tokens) from Zendikar commander? I have a support ticket in, I can provide photos if Scryfall is failing us here.
Yep, thanks for the ticket. they are coming tomorrow!
A few days too late, the new set and the older missing art cards are imported.
https://deckbox.org/editions/594-commander-legends
https://deckbox.org/editions/595-extras … er-legends
https://deckbox.org/editions/596-extras … art-series
* imported Promo Pack: Zendikar Rising
* imported double-faced tokens for Zendikar Rising, and missing Double-Faced Card Placeholders
* fixed missing pricing information for MagicFest cards (in the Grand Prix edition)
Yep, fixed now
Deckbox Forum » Posts by sebi