Search options (Page 7 of 118)

Heya, Sebi

I see the deck:collection matching has been reverted to a premium feature.
I'm not complaining about this, nice as it was for a bit, but I was hoping you could turn off the flagging for unmatched cards in decks.
I loved (And miss) the highlighting if a card added to a deck wasn't in my inventory - but havign the screen yell at me to match to a card I own when I literally can't is a bit offputting, lol.

Thanks

~S~

@sebi Although the Secret Lair deck individual cards "It's Raining Cats and Dogs" are imported, it's missing as a compilation in Editions like the previous Secret Lair Pre-cons; "Cute to Brute",  "Heads I Win, Tails you Lose", "Angels: They're Just Like Us but Cooler and with Wings". Can that get added like the rest?

Thank you for the reply. I plan to stick with it and see what improvements are made. I do like the site a lot.

This is an interesting and complex change, wow! While I'm still getting used to it, some initial thoughts:

1. There should be a "Add a new row for this card" like feature that splits the row, i.e., subtract one from count of the existing row. That'd make it easier to associate cards in a deck with their respective collection copies when going from idea to built deck.
2. Exporting decklists should collapse multiple entries for a card into one. Judges don't care that some of my cards are EX, others are NM, it's not even reflected in the text export/decklist. This may have been a problem before but since I always use the same printing/language for a card in a deck, and didn't care about the selected condition (see also below), I may just never have noticed.
3. It is not possible to revert from a specific printing to the default one. It counts as a custom printing, including showing the yellow highlight. I have 17 Archaeomancers, and the row reverted to "default" claims that I don't have enough of the card in this specific printing, probably because all of them have set and language defined.
4. It would be nice to get back the red indicator for not owning enough of a card in any printing / all versions combined. That's different from having to improvise wrt printings to a significant enough degree to get a separate indicator IMO.
5. Language, set, version, all are more significant for deck building than condition, but it's still useful to track condition for cards when my expensive cards differ there. In particular for premodern or legacy decks I have old cards in multiple wildly different conditions, but otherwise (language, set) identical. Needing up to four rows to correctly reflect this in a built deck seems unnecessary, especially when I own exactly as many as I put in a deck. Perhaps the UI could be streamlined for this case, so internally it's still 4 entries/"rows", but it only shows as one, perhaps with a more complex Edition column?

Hi, is there a way for the build deck feature to automatically select the latest version of the card I own so the rarity symbol is not greyed out?

I find this very frustrating as at first glance I am not sure I am missing the card or no.

I also find it frustrating that the box for the card count in the deck is yellow for both cards I am missing and cards I have not selected a version of.

Again, when looking at it, it looks like I am missing many cards when in fact I own them.

Since the update this site has been much harder to use.

I do enjoy many of the features here, but as a subscriber, I am wondering if this is something I want to continue.