Search options (Page 9 of 54)

So a few thoughts.

1) Master of Cruelties seems to be essentially your only win-con in game 1.  Monoblack devotion will simply scoff at this (they have TONS of answers).  R/G "Monsters" (I really HATE when people call them monsters and not creatures...) will likely flood the board out with stuff that you don't really have answers to and could easily just chump him while they smash you.  U/W control can also answer him relatively easily - Jace, Architect of Thought's +1 actually just blanks your win-con.  I would suggest finding room to move at least 2x Aetherling into the main to give you at least SOME backup plan.

2) Quicken is here just for the cantrip, no?  It strikes me that you would be better suited to simply have another removal or draw spell here - I'm thinking Dreadbore, Hero's Downfall, something along these lines.

3) Rakdos's Return is a tremendously underrated card that can be absolutely backbreaking.  I would suggest upping the count in the main - it can also take out a PW while causing the opponent to empty their hand as you can redirect the damage while still forcing them to discard.

4) 2x Shock?  It might cost 1 more, but Magma Jet would at least  help you with card sorting.

5) I know they're getting a TON of play at the moment, but Desecration Demon fits nicely into your plan here as they offer a hard to answer threat that can both help stabilize the board for you, but more importantly give you SOME sort of an added threat.  In a pinch Hypersonic Dragon is a really underrated threat if you're trying to work on a budget... certainly not optimal, but an option to consider.

6) Anger of the Gods can be really backbreaking for a lot of decks... I'd think maybe going up to 3x in the main could be good.

7) Some other cards to consider in some number include: Slaughter Games, Hero's Downfall, Erebos, God of the Dead, and Pack Rat (it's lame, but it works...).

I really want Grixis to work myself, but I think we're going to have to wait until Journey spoils and we get both Keranos and the Izzet scry land before it's really going to be viable... and even then it's something of a crap-shoot.

Certainly give it a go, but I can say that I played someone running almost this exact list on untap.in earlier and I was running a REALLY rough, actually pretty bad, Junk list and I simply steamrolled him.  The more polished decks (tier 1) won't even slow down...

From a purely technical standpoint, with no tracking, anyone could claim that your cards never arrived.  To this end, much of the trading done on here is done on the honor system.  However, as stated in the trading rules section, you'll note that it is recommended that you use tracking if you're ever in doubt as it is the sender's responsibility to get the cards to the other party - with any luck, they'll be upstanding enough to be honest about whether they received them or not (also a good reason to typically deal with people that have existing rep if possible).

Now, speaking from personal experience, you really are just taking a risk.  Thankfully every trade I've made has arrived safely, tracking or no, but that's not to say that something couldn't have been lost in the mail.  If it's a small trade (say less than $10), most people will send it without tracking with the knowledge that it could be lost and they're just out of luck (such is the price of doing business this way I guess).  For anything over say $30, I would say to ALWAYS use tracking as, if nothing else, that covers your rear in the event something gets lost.

Sorry to hear something got lost... but odds are if you maintain clear communication with your trading partner, you'll be able to work something out.

So the suggestion I often will make to newer players is that it might be worthwhile to first go 'scout' your local FNM before you go to play in it.  The reason for this being, it makes sense to see how competitive the environment is before you dive right in.  Admittedly as a newer player you probably should expect to lose quite a bit (we all have to learn at some point), but if your FNM is populated by super competitive players who are just running the tier 1 net-decks, well, it just isn't going to be as much fun to play (regardless of whether you're winning or losing).

I'll take a closer look at the deck ideas on Friday and will hopefully be able to give you some feedback on what would make them run more smoothly.

Certainly an interesting concept.  My suggestion would be to try to really hone in on two colors perhaps with a tiny splash of a third if there's a piece that's really worth it.

Based on what you're sitting on, I'm seeing you running only four black cards in your deck... you could easily cut them for red or blue pieces.  Specifically, I'm thinking you'd want to bring in a second Lightning Strike, Omenspeaker, and either Traitorous Instinct or Rage of Purphoros.  You're losing Necropolis Regent - arguably the biggest loss as it's a serious bomb, Grim Roustabout - no biggie, and two removal spells - these hurt too, but if you slide in the red burn, you should be in the clear.

Sadly you're not sitting on a lot of real power here as your rares and uncommons are pretty lacking (it would suck in a sealed pool too...).  I'd also suggest making room for Frostburn Weird and a few other bigger items from your "inventory" - specifically, you can lose things like Bellows Lizard at the bottom end of your curve as almost nobody can pull off aggro victories (and you have removal for smaller targets with your burn) in sealed/limited.

I hope these help some...

My reasoning for not doing any of the colorless lands is because three-color in standard is already slow enough with the temples... the last thing you want is to get stuck short on one color.  Sure, Sylvan Caryatid and Frenzied Tilling can both help fix the colors, I'd rather not run into issues with colorless.  That's not to say that Mutavault wouldn't work here, but personally I'd prefer the more stable color base rather than the 2/2.

Ember Swallower should go in here and I just need to figure out where it fits (SB or main)... I'll have to think about what goes in that spot.  The four is pretty crowded with Bramblecrush, Demolish, and Kiora, the Crashing Wave but I can give it a go and see what it does.

I dig the mystics though as they REALLY help speed the curve.  A t3 Frenzied Tilling is SUCH a tempo boost.  The Primeval Bounty also makes it so that they're not dead cards later on.

Ral is in the SB to give some damage power and added ramp effects... It would also be hilarious to get him to ultimate, but unlikely.

Peak Eruption is a GREAT sb card as I can slide it in against any red deck in place of Demolish to get even CHEAPER land hate, while also doing damage.  It's also hilarious to let them Chained to the Rocks a Primordial only to erupt the Mountain, get the Primordial back, destroy another land, and get another land.

I'm starting to think Aetherling really is my best option for a finisher.  I'll up it to 2x in the board and will look for places in the main where I might try to slide it in.  Wreck their land and gain tempo, then I end up with pretty much the most inevitable win-con in the format... yeah... that's good.

Nessian is a bit questionable but definitely better than Stormbreath in here.  For once the tribute effect isn't a big deal as both options work in my favor.  It's either a 3/3 that destroys a land/walker/enchant/artifact (working for my plan) OR it's a 6/6 for 5 (which is pretty efficient mana-wise).

Definitely good thoughts...

Another fun point, Kiora's Follower paired with Zhur-taa Druid is actually tons of fun.

First, I'll second eliterawr's suggestion that you need to pick up Blood Crypts to help with the color fixing.

Second, I recognize that minotaurs are an expensive tribe to run, but I'd suggest trying to lower the curve.  Specifically, Deathbellow Raider gives you a decent added two-drop.  If anything, it would be better than Minotaur Skullcleaver if for no other reason than because of the one added toughness.

Third, I would lower the count of Fanatic to 2x, and in exchange up the count of Rageblood Shaman to 4x.  The lord effect of Rageblood is far more important and will end up benefiting you more often. 

Fourth, maybe it's just me, but I've found that Door of Destinies can be amazing for tribal decks (even in standard constructed play).  Sure it costs four to play, but if you top-deck your two-drops, then you're already dropping something much more powerful.  Give it a whirl, maybe it makes it, maybe it doesnt.  It's worth a shot.

Fifth, Dreadbore is a cheaper option than getting a 4th Hero's Downfall but gives you more answers to opposing threats (including PWs).  You could easily swap them in for Doom Blade as the BR cost isn't going to be hard to manage.

Sixth, you want at least 3, if not 4, Rakdos's Return in your SB to deal with controlling decks.  Simply put, you're going to hit a wall against anything control-oriented.  The ability to zap the opponent for 3-4, redirect to kill their walker, AND cause them to drop their hand is HUGE and often will just end the game.

I would also look at having some number of the following cards either main or in the SB: Madcap Skills, Chandra, Pyromaster, Drown in Sorrow (gotta love that three toughness for most of your minotaurs), Bile Blight (for opposing Pack Rats), and Whip of Erebos.  These will give you more ways around the opponent, more options for one-sided board wipes, answers to major threats, AND lifelink in the event you're trying to race your opponent.

I hope some of this helps.  Good luck.

Moreover, you might be able to get it to go off in game 1; but in games 2 and 3, they'll likely let you over-extend into it.  You cast Swift Justice and potentially Boros Charm to get it going, they kill Reckoner in response to 3-for-1 you.  It, like any infinite combo, will win a few games here or there from the combo but is likely too cute to actually get the job done.  Nevermind that the U/W decks out there are actually built to wait it out - they can easily deal with your threats and, while you have infinite life, they can just control the board and wait until you mill out (Jace, Memory Adept or not).

The deck appears to be standard legal.  The reason it is not identifying as such has to do with the set and format legality definitions (which Sebi has assured me he is in the process of updating).

From a more deck-centric perspective, I would say that there are a few sub-optimal cards in the deck that you could easily swap out.  For instance, Vitu-Ghazi Guildmage will almost always end up just being a 2/2 for 2 - not definitely a bad thing, but it certainly doesn't advance the aggro strategy in the ways you want.  I could see dropping these for a pair of Banisher Priests or Brimaz, King of Oreskos (budget willing of course).  Additionally, I think Unflinching Courage would be better served in the sideboard - as it opens the chance of getting two-for-one'd in several scenarios.  You could easily slide in a variety of cards in its place - Precinct Captain, Spear of Heliod, or even Hunter's Prowess (nothing like an aggro deck that can reload its hand with a single swing).

I can see the appeal of 1x Trostani, Selesnya's Voice for more mid-range games.  But perhaps you might move her to the board too in exchange for some number of Courser of Kruphix (it's not exactly an aggro card, but it helps provide card advantage AND life gain)?

First off, no problem.  The whole idea behind these forums is to provide useful feedback.  I'm glad it was able to help you.

That being said, for the board if you're struggling against Jund or mid-range decks, you would be better suited to have some added mid-rangey power cards in the board to slide in.  Angel of Serenity is an easy one.  Elspeth is also pretty much a given, as would be something like Heliod.  You might also want something to try to go around the threats they're going to be sitting on.  Whether those come in the form of Banisher Priests in the board or even Ajani, Caller of the Pride to get you there.

Brimaz really doesn't have to stick around for long to really have an impact.  Just think of how many times he was hit immediately today... now think about how many of your other creatures survived as a function of Brimaz drawing so much attention.

Ultimately, there really just are some decks that have great match-ups against others.  The fact that Anger of the Gods, Drown in Sorrow or any other sweeper will just hose you in a LOT of instances.  You're well suited in most of your match-ups and that's about the best you can hope for.  Such is the beauty of the game, as if there were a deck that just beats everyone else, well, everyone would just play that deck.

So my understanding is that this exact functionality is being revised/repaired as the addition of BNG in addition to the changes in the bannings for modern have caused a few cards to be in flux.

That being said, you can look at your inventory for anything that's standard legal by using the "editions printed in" filter and selecting everything from Return to Ravnica up to Born of the Gods... it SHOULD pick up all your older stuff that's been reprinted in the latter sets.

The way trample works is the attacking player must assign what would be fatal damage to the defending creature(s), with any remaining damage continuing onward to be assigned to the player.  It is important that only "fatal" damage need be assigned, as it is relevant in these sorts of situations or if the trample creature happens to gain deathtouch.

So to state things as clearly as possible using your example:

The 5/5 trample attacks and is "chump" blocked by the 1/1 indestructible.  Pending no other spells are played and this is the final blocking arrangement, you would proceed into the "assign damage" phase of combat.  You, being the attacking player would be given the choice in how much damage to assign to the defending creature (think of trample as being much like them blocking with more than one creature where you get to choose how damage is assigned).  You would only have to assign 1 damage to the blocker as technically that is all you would need for it to be "fatal" damage, regardless of any abilities the creature has that would prevent said damage.  The remaining four damage could be assigned via trample to the defending player.

Does this make sense?

The reason for the distinction of assigning "fatal" damage is relevant for indestructible, regeneration, other prevent damage abilities (see Fog Bank), and deathtouch.  Note that if the 5/5 trampler were to get deathtouch, they could technically block with 10 toughness across three creatures and you would only have to assign 3 damage (one to each creature) for it to fit the "fatal" damage requirement, allowing you to actually trample through with 2 damage in that scenario.

I hope this helps.  I can clarify more if you still have questions.  Lastly, there's no need to apologize, if you're learning the game and need to ask questions, that's what this forum is here for.

There isn't really any sort of app of that nature out there.  Further, deckbuilding is half the fun of the game... it's an opportunity to be creative or even a bit wacky.  Just identify the format, a color, a few cards, anything and build around that.  You'll be amazed how quickly you can put something together... then try it out, does it work?  If so, cool.  If not, why not?  Then try to improve it.  Were you able to fix it?  Etc... etc...

I can honestly say I don't know anyone on here will go to the time to just outright build a deck for you, but if you come up with one we'll certainly give you some input.