Search options (Page 5 of 7)

When working through many trades simultaneously, someone will often propose trade items that were a want when they created the trade, but have since been accepted in another trade and are no longer needed.

I also occasionally have people propose, out of the blue, a card to trade that I do not have on my want list.

In both cases, I want to know that the item is not something I explicitly asked for, so I can more easily determine whether it should stay in the trade.  This is only really relevant before a trade is confirmed, as in many cases after it's confirmed, the item should no longer be in the want list.

This could be implemented as easily as having the color block for the # in the incoming card row to be a different color similar to how it looks when none are available.  Instead of red, it could be yellow or orange (take caution this may not be needed)

Can we please get a way to sort trade lists and, importantly on trade pages themselves?

I have over 2k cards on my want list and 7k cards on my trade list.  When I'm putting in a trade, especially a large one, I want to be able to focus on specific cards available by my trading partners first.

Here's an example where this person has over 150 cards across 7 pages I need to browse through first before I even start putting together the trade:

I would really like to be able to sort these by Set and Price at a minimum.  Optimally, I could also have advanced filters just like we do on our Inventory and Wants.  Additionally, I see really good use of the "In other trades icon" here so we do not have to add items to our trade to see if it's already in other trades.

Once a trade is initiated, and especially approved, we should be able to sort the data.  This especially important when pulling cards. I think it fair to assume that most people have their collections sorted by set, not all card alphabetically, so locking it to Alphabetically makes pulling cards incredibly difficult.

In this example, My trade partner and I had about 200 cards each from dozens of sets:

Shout out to Cheesewiz for the epic trade!

The technique I am forced to use is to start at the top and do all of the cards from the first set I hit, then once all of that set is pulled, move to the next unpulled card and repeat.  This is exhausting work because you have to remember what sets were pulled, and when you're done, you have to order everything back alphabetically to figure out the one card you missed... Please, at a minimum, allow for sorting by Set.

When the new functionality for storing locations is added, sort by location, then sort by set or alpha would be ideal.  This would allow users to know which trade box/binder to go to and then where to find it in the location depending on how they sort their collection.

Thank you for all you do to improve this platform Sebi.  Your work on this site is greatly appreciated.

Hey all,

I am looking to complete as much of the set as possible while prices are still at a post-release dip.

Here are my wants:
https://deckbox.org/sets/1462937?f=c377 … =m&o=d

And my filtered haves:
https://deckbox.org/sets/1462936?f=c3775.772

Would love to get a big trade in to get this set complete.  Prefer to trade like for like values where possible (mainly avoiding one $30 card for 60 $0.50 ones...)
Of course, I'm happy to trade from the rest of my binder for stuff as well.