Woot! Thanks gumgodMTG! That Chronicles thing was bugging me too! :0)
2 2013-12-03 01:47:00
Re: Bug: Can't add card to a trade (8 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
No comment? :0(
3 2013-12-03 01:41:55
Re: Suggestion: Auto-Select Edition (9 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Well gumgodMTG I must spend too much time here too, because I do the same thing and I noticed the same thing. I wish the special editions were in order of date of release like the rest of them instead of thrown in at the end, but I am still pretty happy with it all.
I have been using the default setting for a couple of weeks now and I am absolutely thrilled with it! It cut down on the time frame for adding things to my wishlist tremendously! Love it!
4 2013-11-27 01:13:36
Topic: Bug: Can't add card to a trade (8 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Unless I am mistaken, there is only one way to add a card from your trade list into a trade. That is to open a new trade, type in the name of the card you want, wait for the list to populate with the words you have chosen and then chose the card that you want to add. Even if you only type in partial titles the system will gather everything it can find and produce a list for you to chose from.
So here is the problem.... I was trying to add the card Ow from the Unglued set into a trade. Of course being that it is only two letters long and the combination o and w are found in hundreds of words, the system naturally spit out more cards than it could list in it's little pop up box saying "Many more results. Please refine". Trouble is, you can't refine the word Ow any more than it already is. Even by putting a space after the ow it still does not help the situation. So ultimately there is no possible way to add this card to a trade.
I know it's not a huge bug by any means but I figured i would bring it to your attention.
5 2013-10-30 01:54:28
Re: Idea for variant Commander format. (8 replies, posted in General Discussion)
I have always thought that it should always be any card ever printed should be legal. It's been one of my pet peeves about this game that they keep changing the rules (ie what's allowed, what's not, how to mulligan, how many cards to play at the start up....used to be you rolled a dice and if you won the roll then you got to go first, none of this if you go first you don't draw crap. It was plain and simple).
In my mind, they have always just pumped out the cards to make money, not because the cards added a whole lot more to the game. The game has changed so that there are so many variants and rules now that it's intimidating to new players (and to old ones that have been off the scene for awhile.... my dad used to play all the time. Now since he has been away from it for a few years he is reluctant to get back in because he feels that too much has changed and he doesn't want to look like a noob when he really isn't. And I don't blame him because I felt the same way when I came back into it).
I think that if you make a card then it should be playable, plain and simple. Perhaps restrict the lethal combos (ie instead of banning a card, ban what it can be played with in a deck so that you don't have those situations arising that made the cards banned in the first place). What was the point in even making the card otherwise? It would definitely make the designers have to stop and think more about how certain cards play well with others. None of this "well if it don't play nice then we will sit little Johnny card in the corner for a time out".
I payed good money or did good trades for some cards and now all that has to happen is let a few years go by and my good money card(s) becomes common because of all the reprints or the changes in the rules that make them practically useless. It's kind of disheartening really. It's set up so that if you want to play in legal tournaments it forces you to dish out money and buy the latest cards. I guess that's why I mostly prefer to play at home. Then I can play my favourite cards that I have had for years.
I probably wouldn't go for the ante thing either, but I definitely like the idea of playing with anything that was printed.
Sorry for the rant. I think that is all my pet peeves spelled out in one little rant session.... I think.
6 2013-10-29 01:05:51
Topic: Bug: Missing Schemes For ARCHENEMY (0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Went to put some schemes into my wishlist this evening for Archenemy and found that I was not able to enter two of them.
You seem to be missing "Plots That Span Centuries" and "Perhaps You’ve Met My Cohort".
7 2013-10-23 01:06:34
Re: request: Wishlist Tool - Number of cards desired per edition (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I like that idea.
Right now you can sort your wishlist by expansion set, which works for those with small wish lists, but those of us with large wish lists (mine being currently at 97 pages and I am not even nearly done adding to it) this just doesn't work well.
I had earlier asked for a way to get from say page 1 to page 39 of my wish list with out having to click through 39 pages to get there (it would work much like the pages here on the forum) and I am still hoping that gets implemented one day.
As it stands now if I want to find out how many I have left that I need for my Chronicles set and what the names of those cards are that I need, I have to click through page after page after page, after page , etc.... until I finally find where they are in my list. Now that set is buried so far into the wish list that I wouldn't even know what page they are on. And since I am still adding it's only going to get worse for me.
8 2013-10-20 17:44:44
Topic: Loving the new Coloured Star System!! (0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
The new colour coded stars for the conditions of the cards is fantastic!
So much easier to see at a glance!
Thanks!
9 2013-10-20 04:19:17
Topic: Question about Unhinged nameless card (1 replies, posted in General Discussion)
Perhaps someone has already asked this in the past, but I don't have the time or inclination to go through all the posts to find out.
Just wondering what the Unhinged nameless card (the one that is named "_______________" ) is listed under so that I can add it to my wishlist.
I tried typing in the underscores but nothing comes up. It also doesn't come up if you type in "name" or "nameless".
Anyone know?
Thanks!
10 2013-10-09 02:07:00
Re: Adding a card with multiple versions in one set (5 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Yeah, like mrturk1001 said, there is only one picture on here for all the versions.
I have been looking for a Chronicles edition of Urza's Power Plant for some time now which has the bug on it. Whenever I see that someone has a Chronicles edition of a Power Plant I just add it to the trade and then I message them to ask them which art work is on the card. If it's not the right one I delete it from the trade. Sometimes the other person will describe it and sometimes they will send me a link to a googled picture of the one that they have. ..... So far no one has the picture I need. It's a bit of a stumbling block when it comes to trying to find the right person to trade with for the one you want, but I am hopeful that I will get the version I need one day.
11 2013-10-08 22:46:27
Re: Change email preferences? (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Also, in your deckbox profile under Settings there is a check box for " I want to receive news". Make sure that is unchecked too.
The only times I get emails are when someone has done something directly involved in a trade of mine (ie sent, received, edited a trade. etc).
12 2013-10-08 22:41:27
Re: Change email preferences? (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Do you mean you are getting email notifications from the forum threads? If so that is probably because when you post a reply to something there is a little check mark box that says " Subscribe To This Topic" . Make sure that is unchecked before you post a reply and you should not get any emails about it.
I am not sure how to un-do the subscription if you forgot to uncheck that box though.
Perhaps writing another reply in the topic and unchecking the box the second time around will resolve it. Just a thought.
13 2013-10-05 17:52:01
Re: Feature request - Filter by inventory count (3 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Adding to what dalden said ..... Being able to " just consider each edition individually" would be extremely useful in all aspects of the site not just the Inventory Count. For those of us with about 60 or more pages of cards on their trade list and wish list it can be pretty time consuming when you want to see all of a certain edition and only that edition.
As it stands now, if I want to see how many more cards and the names of all the cards I need for say the Tempest edition and I filter my wishlist by edition, if it is about half way through the list then I have to click through about 30 or more pages just to get to all cards in that edition.
Same goes for for if I am looking through someone else's large trade list for cards of just one particular edition, or if they are looking through my trade list for cards of just one particular edition.
Shouldn't be all that tricky. The data base is already there and it is obviously already sorting by edition so it's just a matter of limiting what appears on the screen to just the edition you ask for.
14 2013-10-05 17:34:03
Re: Inventory Privacy [Feature Request] (49 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I am a +1 on this too.
I hate it when people ask for things in my inventory. If it's in my inventory it's because this site forces you to have it in your inventory when you add it to the trade list. So that means sometimes when its been traded away and for what ever reason it is still in the inventory list people will ask me for things I no longer have. It's frustrating for both me and them to have to tell them "sorry but 3 of the 5 cards you want to trade me for I don't have any more".
15 2013-09-16 18:19:10
Topic: Request: Improve Remove Cards from wishlist/ Add to inventory (0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Every time I receive cards from a trade I get the window that asks me if I want to remove those cards from my wish list and add them to my inventory, which is great except for one problem.....
I do want to remove them from my wish list but I DON"T want to add them to my inventory (I don't keep track of my inventory on this site or any other site... and I never will).
So I end up always having to say "no" to the option. Which essentially means that the tool for this is completely useless to me. I still end up having to go into my wishlist and removing the cards one by one. And since most of my trades are fairly large, this can take up quite a bit of time.
So my request it this.... can you separate the function into two different functions. First ask if we want to remove them from the wish list - yes or no. Then ask if we want to add them to the inventory - yes or no. That way we can actually use the feature instead of foregoing it every time.
Thanks!
16 2013-09-16 18:04:35
Re: Where did it go? (9 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Ah yes, that's what it's called 'trading opportunities" section (I had forgotten what it was called). It's still missing today. And I am still a member of all the groups I am in so that is not it. But it's nice to know that I am not the only one (not nice to know that we all have the same problem, but good that it's not something I did or didn't do).
I use the trading opportunities quite a bit (although I wish I could filter them and organize them, but none the less it was still a good tool). I am often, not looking for just one particular card (I need thousands that are missing from my collection) so searching by individual cards is much too tedious for me. I would be searching forever if I were to go card by card.
Hope they bring this back real soon.
17 2013-09-16 01:43:59
Re: Trading Rules Discussion: Fake cards (25 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
I am with jassi007 on this topic in all counts.
There could be traders (especially newbies) that legitimately trade a fake and don't know it, and you want to mark them for it? I think that as long as when the fake is discovered and the one sending the fake makes amends then that should be that.
Someone who is deliberately sending fakes will get discovered and ratted out (via these forums). Deal with them on a case by case basis as they come up (which really, I can only see as being a rare thing on this site...trading is much more labour intensive to a true scam artist who is after the cash, not more cards. They are less likely to waste their time in trades when they can sell them...just my humble opinion).
I say don't look for the mountains when there are only mole hills. Concentrate on much more needed features on this site rather than something that may rarely if ever even come up.
18 2013-09-16 01:22:11
Re: Where did it go? (9 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
That was a great idea, thanks!...... But it didn't work.
I logged out and then logged back in and it's still missing.
So I am assuming that yours is still on your profile page then? Am I the only one with it missing? Anyone else?
19 2013-09-16 01:19:30
Topic: Request: Ability to navigate using page numbers (1 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Some of us have huge trade lists and wishlists (my trade list is 73 pages long for example) and despite having a filtered search by name of the card, there are time times when we just want to get to a certain page.
For example I may be just browsing through someone's trade list and do not know what I am looking for really so I can't type something into the filter box. I may have to leave and come back later and when I do, I have to start my search all over again from page one and click "Next" page after page after page.
We need the ability to start at say page 30 or page 52 or what ever page we want instead of just "First" or "Last" or "Next". It should be set up something like this forum is where I can click on a hyper linked page number and navigate through the pages.
I am actually very surprised that this isn't already implemented and I am also very surprised that people haven't been crying out for this type of feature. It's desperately needed in all the sections of the site (Trade List, Wish List, Inventory).
Any chance of this basic feature being implemented at any point? Please, please, please!
Thanks!
20 2013-09-16 01:01:35
Topic: Where did it go? (9 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
Did I miss something? Where did the list of people on my profile page go to that had all the people listed that had cards I needed?
It wasn't the best thing I had ever had to work with, but it was most certainly better than nothing. If it got moved somewhere then I can't figure out where. I hope it's not gone all together. Can someone please fill me in?
Thanks!
21 2013-06-15 21:00:41
Re: How long did it take you to catalog all your cards (48 replies, posted in General Discussion)
I have spent about 3 hours a day and I am on day 4 now and I am still not done. Takes awhile but I enjoy doing that sort of thing. Plus once it's done, as long as you keep it up to date as you go along then you don't have to invest too much more time into it.
22 2013-06-12 03:46:34
Re: Revised only Decks (3 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)
Here is a 40 and 60 card deck for a green/red Revised deck.
40 Cards:
Green
Cockatrice (x3)
Basalisk (x3)
Lure (x4)
Regrowth (x2)
Scryb Sprites (x2)
Red
Kird Ape (x3)
Keldon Warlord (x 1)
Atog (x2)
Uthden Troll (x2)
Artifact
The Hive (x1)
Soul Net (x1)
Land
9 forest
7 mountains
(or if you have any Taiga then you can use less land and add a few more Scryb Sprites or Uthden Troll or Atogs or a couple more artifacts *see from 60 card deck list*)
60 Cards:
Green
Cockatrice (x4)
Basalisk (x4)
Lure (x4)
Regrowth (x2)
Scryb Sprites (x2)
Living Lands (x2)
Red
Kird Ape (x4)
Keldon Warlord (x 2)
Atog (x2)
Uthden Troll (x2)
Fire Breathing (x3)
Disintegrate (x4)
Artifact
The Hive (x2)
Soul Net (x1)
Wooden Sphere (x1)
Iron Star (x1)
Land
10 forest
10 mountains
(or if you have any Taiga then you can use less land and add a few more Scryb Sprites or Uthden Troll or Atogs)
23 2013-06-12 03:10:21
Re: Revised only Decks (3 replies, posted in Decks and Deckbuilding)
Not sure if you are playing 40 or 60 card decks so here is a Black/Blue deck in 40 and then tweeked to make it a 60 card deck:
40 Cards:
Black
Royal Assassin (x3)
Nettling Imp (x3)
Paralyse (x3)
Will-O-Wisp (x3)
Bad Moon (x2)
Blue
Creature Bond (x4)
Clone or Doppleganger...take your pick (x 2)
Prodigal Sorcerer (x2)
Artifact
Meekstone (x1)
Jandor Saddlebags (x1)
Land
9 swamps
7 islands
(or if you have any Underground Seas then you can use less land and add a few more clones or dopplegangers or a couple more artifacts *see from 60 card deck list*)
60 Cards:
Black
Royal Assassin (x4)
Nettling Imp (x4)
Paralyse (x4)
Will-O-Wisp (x4)
Bad Moon (x2)
Blue
Creature Bond (x4)
Clone (x 2)
Doppleganger (x 3)
Prodigal Sorcerer (x2)
Phantom Monster (x2)
Sirens Call (x4)
Artifact
Meekstone (x1)
Jandor Saddlebags (x1)
Throne Of Bone (x1)
Crystal Rod (x1)
Soul Net (x1)
Land
10 swamps
10 islands
(or if you have any Underground Seas then you can use less land and add a few more artifacts or increase clones and dopplegangers)
24 2013-06-02 23:35:33
Topic: Wrong Spoiler pictures for Chronicles set (0 replies, posted in Site Discussion)
The pictures coming up for the Chronicles set show a black border on the cards when in fact the cards have a white border. Could make problems for those who do not know this and are trading and expect one thing and get another.