Search options (Page 1 of 2)

I have noticed Foundations basic lands are missing.

Thanks for the reply.
So this will be back to merging behavior at some time in the future and I do not need to go through the whole collection and manually merge entries, correct?
BR

Similar formats already exist for example Two Dollar Highlander and Penny Dreadful but they never took off because of problems you already listed and a few more.

The major issue you have not listed is the one that for me makes this kinds of formats fail on the spot and cannot be worked around because you literally are basing the format around it. It  is the legality verification. Cards legality basing on their price is abysmally unwieldly metric. For example how do you exactly determine the price of the card - do you use tcg price, cm price, deckbox price etc?
Adjacent to this is the issue you mentioned that is the price fluctuations. This makes your deck fluctuate between brackets (or even become completely illegal) which makes metagame based deckbuilding impossible and since this is the basis of any competitive format in mtg it creates environment where matches results are very unpredictable and makes sideboards almost useless. Basing legality on price also requires you to log all price changes since price can change at any time and card legal at the beginning of a tournament can become illegal later during that very tournament. You probably could implement some kind of hysteresis loop to make those changes less abrupt but that's is only a band-aid and will be almost impossible to implement and manage.
Also whatever you do you are still basing card legality on market value which is derived from card scarcity and not actual power level and this means some cards reprinted into oblivion will be absurdly overpowered compared to other cards printed only in early sets. Due to that and power creep you will end up with format consisting mostly from latest cards plus a few powerful or unique effects from early days of mtg (and those will be probably pushed out of the format anyway due to price increase resulting from higher demand and natural price increase that happens with time). This would make such a format incredibly uninteresting to me since despite being eternal it old cards would be hardly present.
There are more issues related to using price as legality like legality in other formats influencing the price (e.g. Splinter Twin is not legal in modern now but if it would become unbanned its price would significantly increase heavily influencing format you are suggesting).

I have the same issue. I have summitted bug report.

This UI change is very helpful. Thanks a lot.

Endbringer is added to Launch Party promo list twice.
I think that's a mistake.

Thanks a lot for the addition of cards from worlds!

As for the existing errors - cards exclusive to the 8E box set are filed under 8E. They are technically 8E but have separate collectors numbers (S1-S7). I'm not sure if they deserve special treatment as M15 had similar cards in sample decks, though collectors numbers of those were continuing after max set number (270-284).

Sorry to be so anal but thats not entirely true. New users don't get private decks and private inventory features on free account. So those features were moved behind the paywall.
My personal opinion is that those should remain free for everyone.
Also - the marker for built decks - the lightbulb is visible for all decks on free accounts, does not add any functionality that is limited by not having premium account and serves no purpose other than to annoy people.

Please think about what kind of image of a website those things convey to a new visitor.

It's a feature not a bug.
Seriously, it's not a bug because both land and artifact fall under card type according to mtg rules so it's correct for them to show in any of those categories. It's a matter of developers choice where they will show up. But this should be mentioned in changelog if it was intended.

It picks friends recommendations from your city only from what I saw. The differences in administrative divisions in different countries make any filtering other than city and country very hard to implement and may be misleading.
But I'm all for filtering by country and tax region to minimize the costs associated with postage.

God, I hope you are joking. The only viable options for filtering trades geographically are city and country.